IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i19p6831-d1247748.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validation and Psychometric Properties of the German Operational and Organizational Police Stress Questionnaires

Author

Listed:
  • Lauriane Willemin-Petignat

    (Faculty of Psychology, UniDistance Suisse, 3900 Brig, Switzerland
    Psychological Service, Bern Police Department, 3001 Bern, Switzerland)

  • Royce Anders

    (Department of Psychology, Epsylon Laboratory UR4556, University Paul Valéry Montpellier 3, 34000 Montpellier, France)

  • Sabrina Ogi

    (Faculty of Applied Faculty, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, 4600 Olten, Switzerland)

  • Benjamin Putois

    (Faculty of Psychology, UniDistance Suisse, 3900 Brig, Switzerland
    Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, National Centre for Scientific Research UMR 5292—National Institute of Health and Medical Research U1028, 69675 Bron, France)

Abstract

Context: Working in the police force is an operationally and organizationally stressful job. Suitable psychometric tools are needed to detect and study the psychosocial risks of these professionals. The original version contains 40 items, which may be too long for clinical use or as a research control measure. The main aim of this study is to validate the Police Stress Questionnaire (PSQ) in German. The secondary objective is to validate a shorter version. Method: After translation and counter translation of the PSQ-G by a committee of experts, 10 participants pre-tested the comprehension of an intermediate version, allowing the development of a final version that was submitted to a psychometric validation plan with 2314 German-speaking officers. Structure, reliability, and convergent, divergent, and discriminant validities were tested for each sample. Results: The German version of the PSQ performed well psychometrically. We have created a short version of 14 items with good psychometric properties, 7 items for each subscale: operational stressors and organizational stressors. Conclusion: This study validated a German version of the PSQ and provides a reliable measure of stress processes in the police force. A short version is now available.

Suggested Citation

  • Lauriane Willemin-Petignat & Royce Anders & Sabrina Ogi & Benjamin Putois, 2023. "Validation and Psychometric Properties of the German Operational and Organizational Police Stress Questionnaires," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(19), pages 1-12, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:19:p:6831-:d:1247748
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/19/6831/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/19/6831/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Filip Kukić & Dane Subošić & Katie M. Heinrich & Gianpiero Greco & Nenad Koropanovski, 2021. "Psychometric Properties of the Serbian Version of the Operational and Organizational Police Stress Questionnaires," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Royce Anders & Lauriane Willemin-Petignat & Cornelia Rolli Salathé & Andrea C. Samson & Benjamin Putois, 2022. "Profiling Police Forces against Stress: Risk and Protective Factors for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and Burnout in Police Officers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-23, July.
    3. Hart, Peter M. & Wearing, Alexander J. & Headey, Bruce, 1993. "Assessing police work experiences: Development of the police daily hassles and uplifts scales," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 21(6), pages 553-572.
    4. James Steiger & Alexander Shapiro & Michael Browne, 1985. "On the multivariate asymptotic distribution of sequential Chi-square statistics," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 50(3), pages 253-263, September.
    5. Cristina Queirós & Fernando Passos & Ana Bártolo & Sara Faria & Sílvia Monteiro Fonseca & António José Marques & Carlos F. Silva & Anabela Pereira, 2020. "Job Stress, Burnout and Coping in Police Officers: Relationships and Psychometric Properties of the Organizational Police Stress Questionnaire," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-19, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Henry Cadena-Povea & Marco Hernández-Martínez & Gabriela Bastidas-Amador & Josué Calderón-Muñoz, 2025. "Perceived Stress: Psychosocial-Sociodemographic Factors as Predictors of Tension, Irritability, and Fatigue Among Ecuadorian University Professors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(1), pages 1-14, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fetene B. Tekle & Dereje W. Gudicha & Jeroen K. Vermunt, 2016. "Power analysis for the bootstrap likelihood ratio test for the number of classes in latent class models," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 10(2), pages 209-224, June.
    2. Luengo, María Jesús & Obeso, María, 2013. "Efeito da hélice tríplice em desempenho de inovação," RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, FGV-EAESP Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (Brazil), vol. 53(4), July.
    3. Jinshu Cui & Heather Rosoff & Richard S. John, 2018. "Public Response to a Near‐Miss Nuclear Accident Scenario Varying in Causal Attributions and Outcome Uncertainty," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(5), pages 947-961, May.
    4. Hugo Horta & João M. Santos, 2016. "An instrument to measure individuals’ research agenda setting: the multi-dimensional research agendas inventory," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 108(3), pages 1243-1265, September.
    5. Ke-Hai Yuan & Peter Bentler, 2006. "Mean Comparison: Manifest Variable Versus Latent Variable," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 71(1), pages 139-159, March.
    6. Albert Satorra, 1989. "Alternative test criteria in covariance structure analysis: A unified approach," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 54(1), pages 131-151, March.
    7. Viktor Soltes & Jozef Kubas & Andrej Velas & David Michalík, 2021. "Occupational Safety of Municipal Police Officers: Assessing the Vulnerability and Riskiness of Police Officers’ Work," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-19, May.
    8. Ingo Balderjahn, 1988. "A note to Bollen's alternative fit measure," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 53(2), pages 283-285, June.
    9. Claudia Klüppelberg & Gabriel Kuhn, 2009. "Copula structure analysis," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(3), pages 737-753, June.
    10. Wang, Kangqing & Xia, Yiwei & Ma, Zhihao, 2021. "Development and validation of the Chinese public official strain scale," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    11. Sue O’Keefe & Lin Crase, 2005. "Understanding the Education Choices of Public Sector Employees: The Relative Importance of Time and Money," Australian Journal of Labour Economics (AJLE), Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre (BCEC), Curtin Business School, vol. 8(4), pages 331-350, December.
    12. P. M. Bentler & Chih-Ping Chou, 1990. "Model Search With TETRAD II and EQS," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 19(1), pages 67-79, August.
    13. Kroh, Martin, 2007. "Measuring Left-Right Political Orientation: The Choice of Response Format," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 71(2), pages 204-220.
    14. Eileen Huang & Nicole E. Edgar & Sarah E. MacLean & Simon Hatcher, 2022. "Workplace Assessment Scale: Pilot Validation Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-15, September.
    15. Daniel Pérez-Valdecantos & Alberto Caballero-García & Teodosia del Castillo-Sanz & Hugo J. Bello & Enrique Roche & Alba Roche & Alfredo Córdova, 2021. "Variations in Salivary Stress Biomarkers and Their Relationship with Anxiety, Self-Efficacy and Sleeping Quality in Emergency Health Care Professionals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-14, September.
    16. J. M. Santos & H. Horta & H. Luna, 2022. "The relationship between academics’ strategic research agendas and their preferences for basic research, applied research, or experimental development," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(7), pages 4191-4225, July.
    17. Mary Rachelle R Wapaño, 2023. "Exploring the Determinants of Resilience and Hope in the Medical Field: The Role of Age, Gender, and Job Occupation," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(10), pages 1480-1491, October.
    18. Martin Kroh, 2006. "An Experimental Evaluation of Popular Well-Being Measures," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 546, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    19. Scholderer, Joachim & Grunert, Klaus G., 2005. "Consumers, food and convenience: The long way from resource constraints to actual consumption patterns," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 105-128, February.
    20. Michael W. Browne & Robert Cudeck, 1992. "Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 21(2), pages 230-258, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:19:p:6831-:d:1247748. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.