IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i10p5803-d1145331.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: A Global Public Health and Risk Modelling Framework Using an Environmental Deep Neural Network, Sentiment Classification with Text Mining and Emotional Reactions from COVID-19 Vaccination Tweets

Author

Listed:
  • Miftahul Qorib

    (Department of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of the District of Columbia, Washington, DC 20008, USA
    Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of the District of Columbia, Washington, DC 20008, USA)

  • Timothy Oladunni

    (Department of Computer Science, Morgan State University, Baltimore, MD 21251, USA)

  • Max Denis

    (Department of Mechanical and Biomedical Engineering, University of the District of Columbia, Washington, DC 20008, USA)

  • Esther Ososanya

    (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of the District of Columbia, Washington, DC 20008, USA)

  • Paul Cotae

    (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of the District of Columbia, Washington, DC 20008, USA)

Abstract

Popular social media platforms, such as Twitter, have become an excellent source of information with their swift information dissemination. Individuals with different backgrounds convey their opinions through social media platforms. Consequently, these platforms have become a profound instrument for collecting enormous datasets. We believe that compiling, organizing, exploring, and analyzing data from social media platforms, such as Twitter, can offer various perspectives to public health organizations and decision makers in identifying factors that contribute to vaccine hesitancy. In this study, public tweets were downloaded daily from Tweeter using the Tweeter API. Before performing computation, the tweets were preprocessed and labeled. Vocabulary normalization was based on stemming and lemmatization. The NRCLexicon technique was deployed to convert the tweets into ten classes: positive sentiment, negative sentiment, and eight basic emotions (joy, trust, fear, surprise, anticipation, anger, disgust, and sadness). t -test was used to check the statistical significance of the relationships among the basic emotions. Our analysis shows that the p -values of joy–sadness, trust–disgust, fear–anger, surprise–anticipation, and negative–positive relations are close to zero. Finally, neural network architectures, including 1DCNN, LSTM, Multiple-Layer Perceptron, and BERT, were trained and tested in a COVID-19 multi-classification of sentiments and emotions (positive, negative, joy, sadness, trust, disgust, fear, anger, surprise, and anticipation). Our experiment attained an accuracy of 88.6% for 1DCNN at 1744 s, 89.93% accuracy for LSTM at 27,597 s, while MLP achieved an accuracy of 84.78% at 203 s. The study results show that the BERT model performed the best, with an accuracy of 96.71% at 8429 s.

Suggested Citation

  • Miftahul Qorib & Timothy Oladunni & Max Denis & Esther Ososanya & Paul Cotae, 2023. "COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: A Global Public Health and Risk Modelling Framework Using an Environmental Deep Neural Network, Sentiment Classification with Text Mining and Emotional Reactions from COVID," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(10), pages 1-25, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:10:p:5803-:d:1145331
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/10/5803/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/10/5803/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liviu-Adrian Cotfas & Camelia Delcea & Rareș Gherai, 2021. "COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in the Month Following the Start of the Vaccination Process," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-32, October.
    2. Quyen G. To & Kien G. To & Van-Anh N. Huynh & Nhung T. Q. Nguyen & Diep T. N. Ngo & Stephanie J. Alley & Anh N. Q. Tran & Anh N. P. Tran & Ngan T. T. Pham & Thanh X. Bui & Corneel Vandelanotte, 2021. "Applying Machine Learning to Identify Anti-Vaccination Tweets during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-9, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Serge Nyawa & Dieudonné Tchuente & Samuel Fosso-Wamba, 2024. "COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: a social media analysis using deep learning," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 339(1), pages 477-515, August.
    2. Karolina Sobeczek & Mariusz Gujski & Filip Raciborski, 2022. "HPV Vaccination: Polish-Language Facebook Discourse Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-10, January.
    3. Yeon-Jun Choi & Julak Lee & Seung Yeop Paek, 2022. "Public Awareness and Sentiment toward COVID-19 Vaccination in South Korea: Findings from Big Data Analytics," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-14, August.
    4. Thanh Bui & Andrea Hannah & Sanjay Madria & Rosemary Nabaweesi & Eugene Levin & Michael Wilson & Long Nguyen, 2023. "Emotional Health and Climate-Change-Related Stressor Extraction from Social Media: A Case Study Using Hurricane Harvey," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-16, December.
    5. Wajdi Aljedaani & Eysha Saad & Furqan Rustam & Isabel de la Torre Díez & Imran Ashraf, 2022. "Role of Artificial Intelligence for Analysis of COVID-19 Vaccination-Related Tweets: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Trends," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(17), pages 1-33, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:10:p:5803-:d:1145331. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.