IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i19p10438-d649668.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in the Month Following the Start of the Vaccination Process

Author

Listed:
  • Liviu-Adrian Cotfas

    (Department of Economic Informatics and Cybernetics, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010552 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Camelia Delcea

    (Department of Economic Informatics and Cybernetics, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010552 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Rareș Gherai

    (Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 410073 Oradea, Romania)

Abstract

The occurrence of the novel coronavirus has changed a series of aspects related to people’s everyday life, the negative effects being felt all around the world. In this context, the production of a vaccine in a short period of time has been of great importance. On the other hand, obtaining a vaccine in such a short time has increased vaccine hesitancy and has activated anti-vaccination speeches. In this context, the aim of the paper is to analyze the dynamics of public opinion on Twitter in the first month after the start of the vaccination process in the UK, with a focus on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy messages. For this purpose, a dataset containing 5,030,866 tweets in English was collected from Twitter between 8 December 2020–7 January 2021. A stance analysis was conducted after comparing several classical machine learning and deep learning algorithms. The tweets associated to COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy were examined in connection with the major events in the analyzed period, while the main discussion topics were determined using hashtags, n-grams and latent Dirichlet allocation. The results of the study can help the interested parties better address the COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy concerns.

Suggested Citation

  • Liviu-Adrian Cotfas & Camelia Delcea & Rareș Gherai, 2021. "COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in the Month Following the Start of the Vaccination Process," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-32, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:19:p:10438-:d:649668
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/19/10438/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/19/10438/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Latkin, Carl A. & Dayton, Lauren & Yi, Grace & Konstantopoulos, Arianna & Boodram, Basmattee, 2021. "Trust in a COVID-19 vaccine in the U.S.: A social-ecological perspective," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yeon-Jun Choi & Julak Lee & Seung Yeop Paek, 2022. "Public Awareness and Sentiment toward COVID-19 Vaccination in South Korea: Findings from Big Data Analytics," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-14, August.
    2. Miftahul Qorib & Timothy Oladunni & Max Denis & Esther Ososanya & Paul Cotae, 2023. "COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: A Global Public Health and Risk Modelling Framework Using an Environmental Deep Neural Network, Sentiment Classification with Text Mining and Emotional Reactions from COVID," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(10), pages 1-25, May.
    3. Karolina Sobeczek & Mariusz Gujski & Filip Raciborski, 2022. "HPV Vaccination: Polish-Language Facebook Discourse Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-10, January.
    4. Serge Nyawa & Dieudonné Tchuente & Samuel Fosso-Wamba, 2024. "COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: a social media analysis using deep learning," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 339(1), pages 477-515, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Suellen Hopfer & Emilia J. Fields & Magdalen Ramirez & Sorina Neang Long & Heather C. Huszti & Adrijana Gombosev & Bernadette Boden-Albala & Dara H. Sorkin & Dan M. Cooper, 2022. "Adolescent COVID-19 Vaccine Decision-Making among Parents in Southern California," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-20, April.
    2. Sou Hyun Jang, 2022. "Social-ecological factors related to preventive behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic in South Korea," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-14, March.
    3. Moria Golan & Galia Ankori & Tamar Hager, 2022. "Non-Cooperation within a School-Based Wellness Program during the COVID-19 Pandemic—A Qualitative Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-12, June.
    4. Kai Li & Fen Zhou, 2022. "Influence of Information Sources on Chinese Parents Regarding COVID-19 Vaccination for Children: An Online Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-16, June.
    5. Shin KINOSHITA & Masayuki SATO & Takanori IDA, 2022. "Bayesian Probability Revision and Infection Prevention Behavior in Japan : A Quantitative Analysis of the First Wave of COVID-19," Discussion papers e-22-004, Graduate School of Economics , Kyoto University.
    6. Shusaku Sasaki & Tomoya Saito & Fumio Ohtake, 2021. "The Resilience of FDI to Natural Disasters through Industrial Linkages," Discussion Papers in Economics and Business 21-07, Osaka University, Graduate School of Economics.
    7. Subhan Afifi & Aris Yaman & I Gede Mahatma Yuda Bakti & Sik Sumaedi, 2024. "COVID-19 Preventive Behavior and Digital Media: A Bibliometric Study," Studies in Media and Communication, Redfame publishing, vol. 12(1), pages 178-197, March.
    8. Furst, Rodrigo & Goldszmidt, Rafael & Andrade, Eduardo B. & Vieites, Yan & Andretti, Bernardo & Ramos, Guilherme A., 2024. "Longitudinal attenuation in political polarization: Evidence from COVID-19 vaccination adherence in Brazil," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
    9. Dominik Emanuel Froehlich, 2021. "Career Networks in Shock: An Agenda for in-COVID/Post-COVID Career-Related Social Capital," Merits, MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-10, November.
    10. Nicolás C. Bronfman & Paula B. Repetto & Pamela C. Cisternas & Javiera V. Castañeda, 2021. "Factors Influencing the Adoption of COVID-19 Preventive Behaviors in Chile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-13, May.
    11. Greyling, Talita & Rossouw, Stephanié, 2024. "Vaccination uptake, happiness and emotions: using a supervised machine learning approach," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1482, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    12. Ali Bukhari & Daniel A. Adeyinka & Jessica McCutcheon & Natalie Kallio & Nazeem Muhajarine, 2022. "Characteristics Associated with the Dual Behavior of Mask Wearing and Vaccine Acceptance: A Pooled Cross-Sectional Study among Adults in Saskatchewan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-9, March.
    13. Amelia Blamey & Ilan Noy, 2024. "Mistrust and Missed Shots: Trust and Covid-19 Vaccination Decisions," CESifo Working Paper Series 11134, CESifo.
    14. Acar-Burkay, Sinem & Cristian, Daniela-Carmen, 2022. "Cognitive underpinnings of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    15. Bullini Orlandi, Ludovico & Febo, Valentina & Perdichizzi, Salvatore, 2022. "The role of religiosity in product and technology acceptance: Evidence from COVID-19 vaccines," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    16. Oleksy, Tomasz & Wnuk, Anna & Gambin, Małgorzata & Łyś, Agnieszka, 2021. "Dynamic relationships between different types of conspiracy theories about COVID-19 and protective behaviour: A four-wave panel study in Poland," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    17. Shaniece Criss & Thu T. Nguyen & Samantha Norton & Imaya Virani & Eli Titherington & Emma Lou Tillmanns & Courtney Kinnane & Gabrielle Maiolo & Anne B. Kirby & Gilbert C. Gee, 2021. "Advocacy, Hesitancy, and Equity: Exploring U.S. Race-Related Discussions of the COVID-19 Vaccine on Twitter," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-12, May.
    18. Seddig, Daniel & Maskileyson, Dina & Davidov, Eldad & Ajzen, Icek & Schmidt, Peter, 2022. "Correlates of COVID-19 vaccination intentions: Attitudes, institutional trust, fear, conspiracy beliefs, and vaccine skepticism," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    19. Yeon-Jun Choi & Julak Lee & Seung Yeop Paek, 2022. "Public Awareness and Sentiment toward COVID-19 Vaccination in South Korea: Findings from Big Data Analytics," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-14, August.
    20. Liu, Ning & Bao, Guoxian & Wu, Shaolong, 2023. "Social implications of Covid-19: Its impact on general trust, political trust, and trust in physicians in China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:19:p:10438-:d:649668. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.