IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2022i1p490-d1017611.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implementing Climate Change Adaptation in Territory Spatial Planning Systems: Challenges and Approaches Based on Practices in Guiyang

Author

Listed:
  • Li Zong

    (Shanghai Tongji Urban Planning & Design Institute Co., Ltd., Guokang Road 38, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Fan Yang

    (Department of Urban Planning, College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Xinsheng Pei

    (Shanghai Tongji Urban Planning & Design Institute Co., Ltd., Guokang Road 38, Shanghai 200092, China)

Abstract

Integrating climate change adaptation into spatial planning has become a global goal in the field of spatial planning. Despite the various relevant policies proposed by governments, there is still a lack of common practice in the field of climate change research and territory spatial planning preparation and research in China. In this study, climate change adaptation planning in the territory spatial planning system (TSPS), based upon risk assessment, is explored using downscaled climate change prediction data (derived from CMIP5) and prefectural master territory spatial planning (MTSP) data from Guiyang. The study found that such practices, despite their feasibility, still face systemic challenges given the current planning system in China, e.g., the deficiency of climate change impact data and analyses, the absence of essential planning tools, and the unsuitability of the current planning system for the integration of adaptation actions. We propose corresponding approaches based on our empirical planning experience and discuss prospects for relevant research and planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Li Zong & Fan Yang & Xinsheng Pei, 2022. "Implementing Climate Change Adaptation in Territory Spatial Planning Systems: Challenges and Approaches Based on Practices in Guiyang," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-18, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:490-:d:1017611
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/490/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/490/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew Macintosh & Anita Foerster & Jan McDonald, 2015. "Policy design, spatial planning and climate change adaptation: a case study from Australia," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(8), pages 1432-1453, August.
    2. Lin FU & Xiu YANG & Dongyu ZHANG & Ying CAO, 2021. "Assessment of Climate-Resilient City Pilots in China," Chinese Journal of Urban and Environmental Studies (CJUES), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 9(01), pages 1-16, March.
    3. Luis Miguel Fonseca & José Pedro Domingues & Alina Mihaela Dima, 2020. "Mapping the Sustainable Development Goals Relationships," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-15, April.
    4. Tapan K Dhar & Luna Khirfan, 2017. "Climate change adaptation in the urban planning and design research: missing links and research agenda," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(4), pages 602-627, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mediha Burcu Silaydin Aydin & Emine Duygu Kahraman, 2022. "Mitigation or adaptation, the determination of which strategy should be given priority for urban spatial development: the case study of central cities in Turkey," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 1-23, February.
    2. Tiberiu Iancu & Valentina Constanta Tudor & Eduard Alexandru Dumitru & Cristina Maria Sterie & Marius Mihai Micu & Dragos Smedescu & Liviu Marcuta & Elena Tonea & Paula Stoicea & Catalin Vintu & Andy , 2022. "A Scientometric Analysis of Climate Change Adaptation Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-20, October.
    3. Jana S. Kesenheimer & Tobias Greitemeyer, 2021. "Going Green (and Not Being Just More Pro-Social): Do Attitude and Personality Specifically Influence Pro-Environmental Behavior?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-12, March.
    4. Dinko Vusić & Filip Vujanić & Karlo Pešić & Branimir Šafran & Vanja Jurišić & Željko Zečić, 2021. "Variability of Normative Properties of Wood Chips and Implications to Quality Control," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-16, June.
    5. Giliberto Capano & Andrea Lippi, 2017. "How policy instruments are chosen: patterns of decision makers’ choices," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 50(2), pages 269-293, June.
    6. Wirapong Chansanam & Chunqiu Li, 2022. "Scientometrics of Poverty Research for Sustainability Development: Trend Analysis of the 1964–2022 Data through Scopus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, April.
    7. Gonzalo Wandosell & María C. Parra-Meroño & Alfredo Alcayde & Raúl Baños, 2021. "Green Packaging from Consumer and Business Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, January.
    8. Linda Hancock & Linda Wollersheim, 2021. "EU Carbon Diplomacy: Assessing Hydrogen Security and Policy Impact in Australia and Germany," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-27, December.
    9. Luis Fonseca & Vitor Silva & José Carlos Sá & Vanda Lima & Gilberto Santos & Rui Silva, 2022. "B Corp versus ISO 9001 and 14001 certifications: Aligned, or alternative paths, towards sustainable development?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3), pages 496-508, May.
    10. Lingyan Meng & Md Qamruzzaman & Anass Hamad Elneel Adow, 2021. "Technological Adaption and Open Innovation in SMEs: An Strategic Assessment for Women-Owned SMEs Sustainability in Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-22, March.
    11. Halkos, George & Argyropoulou, Georgia, 2022. "Using environmental indicators in performance evaluation of sustainable development health goals," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    12. Luis Fonseca & Filipe Carvalho & Gilberto Santos, 2023. "Strategic CSR: Framework for Sustainability through Management Systems Standards—Implementing and Disclosing Sustainable Development Goals and Results," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-24, August.
    13. Ramos, Maria Priscila & Custodio, Estefania & Jiménez, Sofía & Sartori, Martina & Ferrari, Emanuele, 2022. "Enhancing labour productivity by improving nutrition in Kenya: micro-econometric estimates for dynamic CGE model calibration," Conference papers 333426, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    14. Zander, Kerstin K. & Mathew, Supriya, 2019. "Estimating economic losses from perceived heat stress in urban Malaysia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 84-90.
    15. Tancredi Pascucci & Giuseppina Maria Cardella & Brizeida Hernàndez-Sànchez & Jose Carlos Sànchez-Garcìa, 2022. "Environmental Sensitivity to Form a Sustainable Entrepreneurial Intention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-17, August.
    16. Kral Pavol & Janoskova Katarina & Lazaroiu George & Suler Petr, 2020. "Impact of Selected Socio-Demographic Characteristics on Branded Product Preference in Consumer Markets," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 15(4), pages 570-586, December.
    17. Liane Pinho Santos & João F. Proença, 2022. "Developing Return Supply Chain: A Research on the Automotive Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-24, May.
    18. Cecilia Smaniotto & Anna Saramin & Laura Brunelli & Maria Parpinel, 2022. "Insights and Next Challenges for the Italian Educational System to Teach Sustainability in a Global Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    19. Dragan Vujičić & Nevena Vasiljević & Boris Radić & Andreja Tutundžić & Nevenka Galečić & Dejan Skočajić & Mirjana Ocokoljić, 2024. "Conceptualisation of the Regulatory Framework of Green Infrastructure for Urban Development: Identifying Barriers and Drivers," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-26, May.
    20. Antonella Cammarelle & Mariarosaria Lombardi & Rosaria Viscecchia, 2021. "Packaging Innovations to Reduce Food Loss and Waste: Are Italian Manufacturers Willing to Invest?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:490-:d:1017611. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.