IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i9p5132-d800358.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Moral Sensitivity and Emotional Intelligence in Intensive Care Unit Nurses

Author

Listed:
  • Biyun Ye

    (Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China)

  • Esther Luo

    (School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, USA)

  • Jie Zhang

    (Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Xuelei Chen

    (Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Jingping Zhang

    (Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China
    Current Address: No. 172 Tongzipo Road, Changsha 410013, China.)

Abstract

Moral sensitivity helps individuals resolve moral dilemmas as a precursor to moral decision-making. Intensive care unit (ICU) nurses are at high risk for encountering moral dilemmas and should have the moral sensitivity to recognize moral issues. The activities of ICU nurses in moral decision-making are guided by moral sensitivity but are also based on emotional intelligence (EI). EI, be recognized as an integral part of moral sensitivity with long-standing theoretical foundations. It is necessary to explicate the true role of EI in moral sensitivity through empirical research. To measure the level of moral sensitivity of ICU nurses and determine the relationship between moral sensitivity and EI. We recruited 467 ICU nurses of ten hospitals from March to June 2021 in Hunan Province, China for a cross-sectional questionnaire survey. The moral sensitivity and EI were measured using the Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire-Revised Version into Chinese (MSQ-R-CV) and the Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale-Version into Chinese (WLEIS-C). A self-report questionnaire covered sociodemographic characteristics. The average moral sensitivity score of ICU nurses was 39.41 ± 7.21. The average EI score was significantly positively correlated with the moral sensitivity score ( p < 0.001). This study demonstrated that the moral sensitivities of ICU nurses were at medium levels. EI of ICU nurses can indeed affect their moral sensitivity, and the impact of each element of EI should be clarified for practical application.

Suggested Citation

  • Biyun Ye & Esther Luo & Jie Zhang & Xuelei Chen & Jingping Zhang, 2022. "Moral Sensitivity and Emotional Intelligence in Intensive Care Unit Nurses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-11, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:9:p:5132-:d:800358
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/9/5132/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/9/5132/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marie Hutchinson & John Hurley & Desirée Kozlowski & Leeann Whitehair, 2018. "The use of emotional intelligence capabilities in clinical reasoning and decision‐making: A qualitative, exploratory study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3-4), pages 600-610, February.
    2. Luis González‐de Paz & Belchin Kostov & Antoni Sisó‐Almirall & Adela Zabalegui‐Yárnoz, 2012. "A Rasch analysis of nurses’ ethical sensitivity to the norms of the code of conduct," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(19pt20), pages 2747-2760, October.
    3. Jennifer Rainer & Joanne Kraenzle Schneider & Rebecca A. Lorenz, 2018. "Ethical dilemmas in nursing: An integrative review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(19-20), pages 3446-3461, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Risto Nikunlaakso & Kirsikka Selander & Elina Weiste & Eveliina Korkiakangas & Maria Paavolainen & Tiina Koivisto & Jaana Laitinen, 2022. "Understanding Moral Distress among Eldercare Workers: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-14, July.
    2. Nerea Jiménez-Picón & Macarena Romero-Martín & José Antonio Ponce-Blandón & Lucia Ramirez-Baena & Juan Carlos Palomo-Lara & Juan Gómez-Salgado, 2021. "The Relationship between Mindfulness and Emotional Intelligence as a Protective Factor for Healthcare Professionals: Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-14, May.
    3. Moonok Kim & Younjae Oh & Byunghye Kong, 2020. "Ethical Conflicts Experienced by Nurses in Geriatric Hospitals in South Korea: “If You Can’t Stand the Heat, Get Out of the Kitchen”," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-13, June.
    4. Nihan TOMRİS KÜÇÜN & Sezen GÜNGÖR, 2020. "Victim Identification, Framing Heuristic And Stress Effects On The Donation Decision," Prizren Social Science Journal, SHIKS, vol. 4(2), pages 22-29, August.
    5. Won Lee & Sungkyoung Choi & Sujeong Kim & Ari Min, 2020. "A Case-Centered Approach to Nursing Ethics Education: A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-10, October.
    6. Alessandro Stievano & Laura Sabatino & Dyanne Affonso & Douglas Olsen & Isabelle Skinner & Gennaro Rocco, 2019. "Nursing’s professional dignity in palliative care: Exploration of an Italian context," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(9-10), pages 1633-1642, May.
    7. Kashif Muhammad & Petrovskaya Irina & Samad Sarminah & Wijenayake Shanika, 2021. "Leaving in Mascot of Silence: Organizational Determinants of Employee Turnover Intentions in Mediating and Moderating Roles of Quiescent Silence and Coworker Support in a Russian Context," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 29(2), pages 121-146, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:9:p:5132-:d:800358. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.