IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i3-4pe600-e610.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The use of emotional intelligence capabilities in clinical reasoning and decision‐making: A qualitative, exploratory study

Author

Listed:
  • Marie Hutchinson
  • John Hurley
  • Desirée Kozlowski
  • Leeann Whitehair

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore clinical nurses’ experiences of using emotional intelligence capabilities during clinical reasoning and decision‐making. Background There has been little research exploring whether, or how, nurses employ emotional intelligence (EI) in clinical reasoning and decision‐making. Design Qualitative phase of a larger mixed‐methods study. Methods Semistructured qualitative interviews with a purposive sample of registered nurses (n = 12) following EI training and coaching. Constructivist thematic analysis was employed to analyse the narrative transcripts. Results Three themes emerged: the sensibility to engage EI capabilities in clinical contexts, motivation to actively engage with emotions in clinical decision‐making and incorporating emotional and technical perspectives in decision‐making. Conclusion Continuing to separate cognition and emotion in research, theorising and scholarship on clinical reasoning is counterproductive. Relevance to clinical practice Understanding more about nurses’ use of EI has the potential to improve the calibre of decisions, and the safety and quality of care delivered.

Suggested Citation

  • Marie Hutchinson & John Hurley & Desirée Kozlowski & Leeann Whitehair, 2018. "The use of emotional intelligence capabilities in clinical reasoning and decision‐making: A qualitative, exploratory study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3-4), pages 600-610, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:3-4:p:e600-e610
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14106
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14106?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shiah‐Lian Chen & Hsiu‐Ying Hsu & Chin‐Fu Chang & Esther Ching‐Lan Lin, 2016. "An exploration of the correlates of nurse practitioners’ clinical decision‐making abilities," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(7-8), pages 1016-1024, April.
    2. Stephanie M Carpenter & J Frank Yates & Stephanie D Preston & Lydia Chen, 2016. "Regulating Emotions during Difficult Multiattribute Decision Making: The Role of Pre-Decisional Coherence Shifting," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-21, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nerea Jiménez-Picón & Macarena Romero-Martín & José Antonio Ponce-Blandón & Lucia Ramirez-Baena & Juan Carlos Palomo-Lara & Juan Gómez-Salgado, 2021. "The Relationship between Mindfulness and Emotional Intelligence as a Protective Factor for Healthcare Professionals: Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-14, May.
    2. Biyun Ye & Esther Luo & Jie Zhang & Xuelei Chen & Jingping Zhang, 2022. "Moral Sensitivity and Emotional Intelligence in Intensive Care Unit Nurses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-11, April.
    3. Nihan TOMRİS KÜÇÜN & Sezen GÜNGÖR, 2020. "Victim Identification, Framing Heuristic And Stress Effects On The Donation Decision," Prizren Social Science Journal, SHIKS, vol. 4(2), pages 22-29, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:3-4:p:e600-e610. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.