IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i8p4777-d794283.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of E-Learning Experience among Health and Allied Health Professions Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Slovenia: An Instrument Development and Validation Study

Author

Listed:
  • Mirko Prosen

    (Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Primorska, Polje 42, 6310 Izola, Slovenia)

  • Igor Karnjuš

    (Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Primorska, Polje 42, 6310 Izola, Slovenia)

  • Sabina Ličen

    (Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Primorska, Polje 42, 6310 Izola, Slovenia)

Abstract

COVID-19 had an impact on everyday life, especially during the lockdown. This also impacted higher education, leading to a sudden and complete shift to online e-learning. The purpose of this study was to develop, validate, and test a measurement tool suitable for evaluating students’ e-learning experience among health and allied health professions students. The convenience sample consisted of 342 students. A validation of the instrument E-learning Experience Evaluation Scale (3E-Scale) was conducted before the study began. Factor structure, reliability, content, and face validity were assessed. Confirmatory factor analyses revealed a four-factor structure of the scale that explained 61% of the total variance. The overall scale demonstrated a high level of reliability and appears to be a reliable measurement tool. The results show that there are statistically significant differences between female and male students ( p < 0.05). In addition, nursing and dietetics students perceive more barriers related to the open-source learning management system than other students ( p < 0.05). Positive learning experiences contribute to greater learning satisfaction and, consequently, greater learning engagement. E-learning content design should be aligned with teaching pedagogy and learning outcomes. Future studies should also address the negative consequences of e-learning experiences.

Suggested Citation

  • Mirko Prosen & Igor Karnjuš & Sabina Ličen, 2022. "Evaluation of E-Learning Experience among Health and Allied Health Professions Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Slovenia: An Instrument Development and Validation Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-12, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:8:p:4777-:d:794283
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/8/4777/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/8/4777/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andreea Barbu & Mirona Ana Maria Popescu & Georgiana Moiceanu, 2022. "Perspective of Teachers and Students towards the Education Process during COVID-19 in Romanian Universities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-21, March.
    2. Sook-Young Kim & Shin-Jeong Kim & Soon-Hee Lee, 2021. "Effects of Online Learning on Nursing Students in South Korea during COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-12, August.
    3. Parvin Lakbala, 2016. "Barriers in Implementing E-Learning in Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(7), pages 1-83, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elena Dell’Aquila & Federica Vallone & Maria Clelia Zurlo & Davide Marocco, 2023. "A Tailored MOOC Fostering Intercultural Conflict Management in the Educational Context: Evidence from Italy," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-14, June.
    2. Sabina Ličen & Maria Cassar & Lucia Filomeno & Alexandros Yeratziotis & Mirko Prosen, 2023. "Development and Validation of an Evaluation Toolkit to Appraise eLearning Courses in Higher Education: A Pilot Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-15, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mădălin-Dorin Pop & Adrian Pavel Pugna & Vladimir-Ioan Crețu & Sabina Alina Potra, 2022. "Two Years of Hybrid Education in Romania: A Comparative Overview of the Students’ Expectations for the Online Educational Platforms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-27, October.
    2. Hae-Kyoung Son, 2021. "The Effects of Simulation Problem-Based Learning on the Empathy, Attitudes toward Caring for the Elderly, and Team Efficacy of Undergraduate Health Profession Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-14, September.
    3. Stefan-Alexandru Catana & Sorin-George Toma & Catalin Gradinaru, 2022. "The Product Life Cycle And The Boston Consulting Group’S Growth- Share Matrix In Marketing Simulations," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 4, pages 319-324, August.
    4. Nitza Davidovitch & Eyal Eckhaus, 2024. "Who Needs Academic Campuses? Are There Advantages to Studying on an Academic Campus Considering the Experience of Online Teaching Five Years after COVID-19?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-17, July.
    5. Cristina Andrada Costea & Dora Maria Popescu & Alexandra Roman & Ștefan-Ioan Stratul & Petra Șurlin & Marius Negucioiu & Iulia Cristina Micu & Andreea Ciurea & Patricia Ondine Lucaciu & Luminița Lazăr, 2022. "The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Romanian Postgraduate Periodontal Residency Teaching: Past Experience, Present Imperatives and Future Considerations in a Multicentric Evaluation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-14, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:8:p:4777-:d:794283. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.