IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i8p6361-d1118274.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and Validation of an Evaluation Toolkit to Appraise eLearning Courses in Higher Education: A Pilot Study

Author

Listed:
  • Sabina Ličen

    (Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Primorska, Polje 42, 6310 Izola, Slovenia)

  • Maria Cassar

    (Department of Nursing, Tal-Qroqq University of Malta, 2080 Msida, Malta)

  • Lucia Filomeno

    (Department of Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy)

  • Alexandros Yeratziotis

    (Department of Computer Science, University of Cyprus, Nicosia 1678, Cyprus)

  • Mirko Prosen

    (Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Primorska, Polje 42, 6310 Izola, Slovenia)

Abstract

The development and evaluation of eLearning approaches is a global trend in higher education today. This study aimed to develop a companion evaluation toolkit consisting of formative and summative assessment scales to evaluate academics’ experiences in designing, delivering, and evaluating eLearning. To test the psychometric properties of the companion evaluation toolkit, an instrument validation study was conducted. Items were created, then tested for content and face validity. A confirmatory factor analysis ( n = 185 participants) for the summative assessment scale examined the underlying structure of the scale, while reliability was assessed using the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. The results show that the model examined is consistent with the 3 factors (33 items) explaining a total of 62% of the variance. The results also show a high level of reliability for both the formative and summative scales that comprise the companion evaluation toolkit. The results of this study can be used and welcomed by both teachers and professionals involved in the development and use of learning management systems or in the design, delivery, and evaluation of the eLearning process.

Suggested Citation

  • Sabina Ličen & Maria Cassar & Lucia Filomeno & Alexandros Yeratziotis & Mirko Prosen, 2023. "Development and Validation of an Evaluation Toolkit to Appraise eLearning Courses in Higher Education: A Pilot Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-15, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:8:p:6361-:d:1118274
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/8/6361/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/8/6361/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mirko Prosen & Igor Karnjuš & Sabina Ličen, 2022. "Evaluation of E-Learning Experience among Health and Allied Health Professions Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Slovenia: An Instrument Development and Validation Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-12, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qian Xu & Azzeddine Boudouaia, 2023. "A Study on Technology Use for Sustainable Graduate Education Internationalization at Home: Chinese Teachers’ Experiences and Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Barbara Predan & Petra Černe Oven, 2023. "Developing a Pedagogical Approach with the Aim of Empowering Educators and Students to Address Emerging Global Issues such as Climate Change and Social Justice: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-22, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elena Dell’Aquila & Federica Vallone & Maria Clelia Zurlo & Davide Marocco, 2023. "A Tailored MOOC Fostering Intercultural Conflict Management in the Educational Context: Evidence from Italy," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-14, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:8:p:6361-:d:1118274. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.