IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i7p3875-d778771.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

User Perception of New E-Health Challenges: Implications for the Care Process

Author

Listed:
  • María Esther González-Revuelta

    (Grupo Investigación TIC019 Electrónica, Comunicaciones y Telemedicina (04120) Servicio Informática y Sistemas de Información, Equipo Provincial TIC, Hospital Universitario Torrecárdenas, 04009 Almería, Spain)

  • Nuria Novas

    (Grupo Investigación TIC019 Electrónica, Comunicaciones y Telemedicina, Universidad de Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain)

  • Jose Antonio Gázquez

    (Grupo Investigación TIC019 Electrónica, Comunicaciones y Telemedicina, Universidad de Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain)

  • Manuel Ángel Rodríguez-Maresca

    (Unidad de Gestión Clínica Laboratorios, Hospital Universitario Torrecárdenas, 04009 Almería, Spain)

  • Juan Manuel García-Torrecillas

    (Unidad de Investigación Biomedica, Hospital Universitario Torrecárdenas, 04009 Almería, Spain
    CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), 28029 Madrid, Spain
    Instituto de Investigación Biomédica Ibs. Granada, 18012 Granada, Spain)

Abstract

Establishing new models of health care and new forms of professional health-patient communication are lines of development in the field of health care. The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the evolution of information systems and communication platforms to guarantee continuity of care and compliance with social distancing measures. Our objective in this article was, firstly, to know the expectations of patients treated in the healthcare processes “cervical cancer” and “pregnancy, childbirth and puerperium” regarding online access to their clinical history and follow-up in the care process. Secondly, we analyzed times involved in the cervical cancer process to find points of improvement in waiting times when digital tools were used for communication with the patient. A descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out on 120 women included in any of the aforementioned processes using a hetero-administered questionnaire. The analysis of times was carried out using the Business Intelligence tool Biwer Analytics ® . Patients showed interest in knowing their results before the appointment with the doctor and would avoid appointments with their doctor if the right conditions were met. Most recognized that this action would relieve their restlessness and anxiety. They were highly interested in receiving recommendations to improve their health status. It was estimated that there was room for improvement in the times involved in the care process, which could be shortened by 34.48 days if communication of results were through digital information access technologies. This would favor the optimization of time, resources and user perception.

Suggested Citation

  • María Esther González-Revuelta & Nuria Novas & Jose Antonio Gázquez & Manuel Ángel Rodríguez-Maresca & Juan Manuel García-Torrecillas, 2022. "User Perception of New E-Health Challenges: Implications for the Care Process," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-15, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:7:p:3875-:d:778771
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/7/3875/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/7/3875/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maria Magdalena Bujnowska-Fedak & Paulina Węgierek, 2020. "The Impact of Online Health Information on Patient Health Behaviours and Making Decisions Concerning Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-13, January.
    2. Se-Ra Oh & Young-Duk Seo & Euijong Lee & Young-Gab Kim, 2021. "A Comprehensive Survey on Security and Privacy for Electronic Health Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-48, September.
    3. Maria Magdalena Bujnowska-Fedak & Łukasz Wysoczański, 2020. "Access to an Electronic Health Record: A Polish National Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-17, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karol Król & Dariusz Zdonek, 2021. "The Quality of Infectious Disease Hospital Websites in Poland in Light of the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-19, January.
    2. Wild, Frank & Kozica, Daria, 2021. "E-Health-Anwendungen im Ländervergleich," WIP-Kurzanalysen September 2021, WIP – Wissenschaftliches Institut der PKV, Köln.
    3. Maria Magdalena Bujnowska-Fedak & Łukasz Wysoczański, 2020. "Access to an Electronic Health Record: A Polish National Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-17, August.
    4. Yuho Shimizu & Aimi Ishizuna & Shin Osaki & Takaaki Hashimoto & Mitsuharu Tai & Tetsushi Tanibe & Kaori Karasawa, 2022. "The Social Acceptance of Smart Health Services in Japan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-11, January.
    5. Adnan Muhammad Shah & Mudassar Ali & Abdul Qayyum & Abida Begum & Heesup Han & Antonio Ariza-Montes & Luis Araya-Castillo, 2021. "Exploring the Impact of Linguistic Signals Transmission on Patients’ Health Consultation Choice: Web Mining of Online Reviews," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-21, September.
    6. Brian J. Carter & Tzuan A. Chen & Dalnim Cho & Shahnjayla K. Connors & Ammar D. Siddiqi & Lorna H. McNeill & Lorraine R. Reitzel, 2022. "Examining Associations between Source of Cancer Information and Mammography Behavior among Black Church-Going Women," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-19, October.
    7. Ioanna Giannoukou, 2024. "Revolutionizing Hospitality: Strategic Integration of Innovation Management Embracing Technological Innovation for Enhanced Customer Experiences," Technium Business and Management, Technium Science, vol. 7(1), pages 24-39.
    8. Justyna Rój, 2022. "Inequity in the Access to eHealth and Its Decomposition Case of Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-14, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:7:p:3875-:d:778771. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.