IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i4p2336-d752293.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Both Gender and Agonistic Experience Affect Perceived Pain during the Cold Pressor Test

Author

Listed:
  • Pierluigi Diotaiuti

    (Department of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, 03043 Cassino, Italy)

  • Stefano Corrado

    (Department of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, 03043 Cassino, Italy)

  • Stefania Mancone

    (Department of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, 03043 Cassino, Italy)

  • Marco Palombo

    (Department of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, 03043 Cassino, Italy)

  • Angelo Rodio

    (Department of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, 03043 Cassino, Italy)

  • Lavinia Falese

    (Department of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, 03043 Cassino, Italy)

  • Elisa Langiano

    (Department of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, 03043 Cassino, Italy)

  • Thaìs Cristina Siqueira

    (Health and Sports Science Center, Department of Physical Education, CEFID, Santa Catarina State University, Florianópolis 88035-901, Brazil)

  • Alexandro Andrade

    (Health and Sports Science Center, Department of Physical Education, CEFID, Santa Catarina State University, Florianópolis 88035-901, Brazil)

Abstract

Background. Differences in pain perception in athletes have recently been highlighted in the literature. Objectives. To compare gender ratings of perceived pain in athletes with low and high agonistic experiences (N = 200) using the Cold Pressor Test (CPT). Methods. A three-way repeated measures ANOVA to assess both the effects of the athletes’ gender and lower vs. higher agonistic experiences in the intensity of perceived pain at the beginning of the cold box hand immersion (L 0 ) and after a 90 s interval (L 1 ). Results. There was a statistically significant interaction effect between the level of the agonistic experience and gender in the two moments: p < 0.001; η p 2 = 0.266; F(1,49) = 9.771. Simple main effects analysis showed a significative difference for females at L 0 : F(1,99) = 93.567, p < 0.025, partial η 2 = 0.302) and for males at L 1 : F(1,99) = 173.420, p < 0.025, partial η 2 = 0.666. At the initial moment of CPT, the female athletes showed significantly higher perceived intensity than males, regardless of their experience level. After a 90 s interval, a significantly lower pain perception effect associated with the increased competitive experience of male athletes was observed. Female athletes did not appear to benefit from the experience effect on their pain tolerance. Conclusions. The study confirmed a significant difference in pain perception associated with the athletes’ gender and agonistic experience. Separate explanations related to the pattern of pain inhibition and the acquired reduction in pain sensitivity are reported.

Suggested Citation

  • Pierluigi Diotaiuti & Stefano Corrado & Stefania Mancone & Marco Palombo & Angelo Rodio & Lavinia Falese & Elisa Langiano & Thaìs Cristina Siqueira & Alexandro Andrade, 2022. "Both Gender and Agonistic Experience Affect Perceived Pain during the Cold Pressor Test," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-11, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:4:p:2336-:d:752293
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/4/2336/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/4/2336/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pierluigi Diotaiuti & Stefano Corrado & Stefania Mancone & Lavinia Falese & Angelo Rodio & Thaìs Cristina Siqueira & Alexandro Andrade, 2021. "Influence of Cognitive Orientation and Attentional Focus on Pain Perception," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-13, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pierluigi Diotaiuti & Stefania Mancone & Stefano Corrado, 2022. "Motivations and Personal Traits Can Predict Self-Efficacy of the Clown Therapist: A Descriptive Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-20, June.
    2. Pierluigi Diotaiuti & Giuseppe Valente & Stefania Mancone & Lavinia Falese & Stefano Corrado & Thais Cristina Siqueira & Alexandro Andrade, 2022. "A Psychoeducational Intervention in Prenatal Classes: Positive Effects on Anxiety, Self-Efficacy, and Temporal Focus in Birth Attendants," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Pierluigi Diotaiuti & Giuseppe Valente & Stefania Mancone & Stefano Corrado & Fernando Bellizzi & Lavinia Falese & Elisa Langiano & Guilherme Torres Vilarino & Alexandro Andrade, 2023. "Effects of Cognitive Appraisals on Perceived Self-Efficacy and Distress during the COVID-19 Lockdown: An Empirical Analysis Based on Structural Equation Modeling," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(7), pages 1-16, March.
    4. Alexis Sossa Rojas, 2024. "Bodily Practices and Meanings Articulated in the Physical Exercise of Older Adults in Santiago de Chile Post-COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(5), pages 1-17, April.
    5. Pierluigi Diotaiuti & Giuseppe Valente & Stefano Corrado & Stefania Mancone, 2023. "Assessing Decentering Capacity in Athletes: A Moderated Mediation Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-13, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:4:p:2336-:d:752293. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.