IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i3p1133-d729134.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Novel Integration of IF-DEMATEL and TOPSIS for the Classifier Selection Problem in Assistive Technology Adoption for People with Dementia

Author

Listed:
  • Miguel Angel Ortíz-Barrios

    (Department of Productivity and Innovation, Universidad de la Costa CUC, Barranquilla 081001, Colombia)

  • Matias Garcia-Constantino

    (School of Computing and Mathematics, Ulster University, Jordanstown BT37 0QB, UK)

  • Chris Nugent

    (School of Computing and Mathematics, Ulster University, Jordanstown BT37 0QB, UK)

  • Isaac Alfaro-Sarmiento

    (Department of Productivity and Innovation, Universidad de la Costa CUC, Barranquilla 081001, Colombia)

Abstract

The classifier selection problem in Assistive Technology Adoption refers to selecting the classification algorithms that have the best performance in predicting the adoption of technology, and is often addressed through measuring different single performance indicators. Satisfactory classifier selection can help in reducing time and costs involved in the technology adoption process. As there are multiple criteria from different domains and several candidate classification algorithms, the classifier selection process is now a problem that can be addressed using Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methods. This paper proposes a novel approach to address the classifier selection problem by integrating Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets (IFS), Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL), and the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). The step-by-step procedure behind this application is as follows. First, IF-DEMATEL was used for estimating the criteria and sub-criteria weights considering uncertainty. This method was also employed to evaluate the interrelations among classifier selection criteria. Finally, a modified TOPSIS was applied to generate an overall suitability index per classifier so that the most effective ones can be selected. The proposed approach was validated using a real-world case study concerning the adoption of a mobile-based reminding solution by People with Dementia (PwD). The outputs allow public health managers to accurately identify whether PwD can adopt an assistive technology which results in (i) reduced cost overruns due to wrong classification, (ii) improved quality of life of adopters, and (iii) rapid deployment of intervention alternatives for non-adopters.

Suggested Citation

  • Miguel Angel Ortíz-Barrios & Matias Garcia-Constantino & Chris Nugent & Isaac Alfaro-Sarmiento, 2022. "A Novel Integration of IF-DEMATEL and TOPSIS for the Classifier Selection Problem in Assistive Technology Adoption for People with Dementia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-31, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1133-:d:729134
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1133/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1133/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Akshay Hinduja & Manju Pandey, 2019. "An Integrated Intuitionistic Fuzzy MCDM Approach to Select Cloud-Based ERP System for SMEs," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(06), pages 1875-1908, November.
    2. Mohamed Hanine & Omar Boutkhoum & Fatima El Barakaz & Mohamed Lachgar & Noureddine Assad & Furqan Rustam & Imran Ashraf, 2021. "An Intuitionistic Fuzzy Approach for Smart City Development Evaluation for Developing Countries: Moroccan Context," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(21), pages 1-22, October.
    3. A. R. de Leon & A. Soo & T. Williamson, 2011. "Classification with discrete and continuous variables via general mixed-data models," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(5), pages 1021-1032, February.
    4. Indre Siksnelyte-Butkiene & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Dalia Streimikiene, 2020. "Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) for the Assessment of Renewable Energy Technologies in a Household: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-22, March.
    5. Detcharat Sumrit, 2020. "A hybrid multi-criteria decision making model for technological innovation capabilities measurement in automotive parts industry," International Journal of Management and Decision Making, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 19(1), pages 1-43.
    6. Ocampo, Lanndon & Yamagishi, Kafferine, 2020. "Modeling the lockdown relaxation protocols of the Philippine government in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: An intuitionistic fuzzy DEMATEL analysis," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shan-Fu Yu & Hui-Ting Wang & Meng-Wei Chang & Tien-Tsai Cheng & Jia-Feng Chen & Chia-Li Lin & Hsing-Tse Yu, 2022. "Determining the Development Strategy and Suited Adoption Paths for the Core Competence of Shared Decision-Making Tasks through the SAA-NRM Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-23, October.
    2. Parishani, Maede & Rasti-Barzoki, Morteza, 2024. "CWBCM method to determine the importance of classification performance evaluation criteria in machine learning: Case studies of COVID-19, Diabetes, and Thyroid Disease," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    3. Miguel Ortíz-Barrios & Natalia Jaramillo-Rueda & Muhammet Gul & Melih Yucesan & Genett Jiménez-Delgado & Juan-José Alfaro-Saíz, 2023. "A Fuzzy Hybrid MCDM Approach for Assessing the Emergency Department Performance during the COVID-19 Outbreak," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-39, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gigih Rahmandhani Setyantho & Hansaem Park & Seongju Chang, 2021. "Multi-Criteria Performance Assessment for Semi-Transparent Photovoltaic Windows in Different Climate Contexts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-21, February.
    2. Sebastian Schär & Jutta Geldermann, 2021. "Adopting Multiactor Multicriteria Analysis for the Evaluation of Energy Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Dzido, Aleksandra & Krawczyk, Piotr & Wołowicz, Marcin & Badyda, Krzysztof, 2022. "Comparison of advanced air liquefaction systems in Liquid Air Energy Storage applications," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 727-739.
    4. A. G. Olabi & Khaled Obaideen & Mohammad Ali Abdelkareem & Maryam Nooman AlMallahi & Nabila Shehata & Abdul Hai Alami & Ayman Mdallal & Asma Ali Murah Hassan & Enas Taha Sayed, 2023. "Wind Energy Contribution to the Sustainable Development Goals: Case Study on London Array," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-22, March.
    5. Javed, Muhammad Shahzad & Ma, Tao & Jurasz, Jakub & Mikulik, Jerzy, 2021. "A hybrid method for scenario-based techno-economic-environmental analysis of off-grid renewable energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    6. Bartłomiej Kizielewicz & Jarosław Wątróbski & Wojciech Sałabun, 2020. "Identification of Relevant Criteria Set in the MCDA Process—Wind Farm Location Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-40, December.
    7. Alban Mbina Mbina & Guy Martial Nkiet & Fulgence Eyi Obiang, 2019. "Variable selection in discriminant analysis for mixed continuous-binary variables and several groups," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 13(3), pages 773-795, September.
    8. Chen, Faan & Li, Yaxin & Feng, Qianqian & Dong, Zehao & Qian, Yiming & Yan, Yi & Ho, Mun S. & Ma, Qianchen & Zhang, Dashan & Jin, Yuanzhe, 2023. "Road safety performance rating through PSI-PRIDIT: A planning tool for designing policies and identifying best practices for EAS countries," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    9. Chi-Yo Huang & Jih-Jeng Huang & You-Ning Chang & Yen-Chu Lin, 2021. "A Fuzzy-MOP-Based Competence Set Expansion Method for Technology Roadmap Definitions," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-26, January.
    10. José Carlos Romero & Pedro Linares, 2021. "Multiple Criteria Decision-Making as an Operational Conceptualization of Energy Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-14, October.
    11. Ali Mostafaeipour & Seyyed Jalaladdin Hosseini Dehshiri & Seyyed Shahabaddin Hosseini Dehshiri & Mehdi Jahangiri & Kuaanan Techato, 2020. "A Thorough Analysis of Potential Geothermal Project Locations in Afghanistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-17, October.
    12. Ghodusinejad, Mohammad Hasan & Lavasani, Zahra & Yousefi, Hossein, 2023. "A combined decision-making framework for techno-enviro-economic assessment of a commercial CCHP system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    13. Büşra Dağci Yüksel & Filiz Ersöz, 2024. "Evaluation of ERP software selection criteria with fuzzy AHP approach: an application in the metal production enterprises in the aviation industry," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 15(6), pages 2656-2667, June.
    14. Huang, Chiou-Jye & Shen, Yamin & Kuo, Ping-Huan & Chen, Yung-Hsiang, 2022. "Novel spatiotemporal feature extraction parallel deep neural network for forecasting confirmed cases of coronavirus disease 2019," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    15. He, Yongming & Kang, Jia & Pei, Yulong & Ran, Bin & Song, Yuting, 2021. "Research on influencing factors of fuel consumption on superhighway based on DEMATEL-ISM model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    16. Panarello, Demetrio & Tassinari, Giorgio, 2022. "One year of COVID-19 in Italy: are containment policies enough to shape the pandemic pattern?," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    17. Hira Soomro & Syed Feroz Shah & Wasayo Sanam Sahito & Mohammad Aslam Uqaili & Laveet Kumar & Jonathan Daniel Nixon & Khanji Harijan, 2022. "Assessment of Sustainable Biomass Energy Technologies in Pakistan Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-19, September.
    18. Siksnelyte-Butkiene, Indre & Streimikiene, Dalia & Balezentis, Tomas, 2022. "Addressing sustainability issues in transition to carbon-neutral sustainable society with multi-criteria analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).
    19. Lo, Huai-Wei & Lin, Sheng-Wei, 2023. "Identifying ESG investment key indicators and selecting investment trust companies by using a Z-fuzzy-based decision-making model," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    20. Rivero-Iglesias, Jose M. & Puente, Javier & Fernandez, Isabel & León, Omar, 2023. "Integrated model for the assessment of power generation alternatives through analytic hierarchy process and a fuzzy inference system. Case study of Spain," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 563-581.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1133-:d:729134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.