IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i24p16890-d1004989.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Systematic Review Exploring the Theories Underlying the Improvement of Balance and Reduction in Falls Following Dual-Task Training among Older Adults

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Jobair Khan

    (Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong 999077, China)

  • Priya Kannan

    (Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong 999077, China)

  • Thomson Wai-Lung Wong

    (Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong 999077, China)

  • Kenneth N. K. Fong

    (Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong 999077, China)

  • Stanley John Winser

    (Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong 999077, China)

Abstract

Background: Balance impairment causes frequent falls in older adults, and preventing falls remains challenging. Dual-task (DT) training reduces falls by improving balance, but the precise theory is not fully understood. This review aims to explore the theories underlying the effectiveness of DT in improving balance and reducing falls in older adults. Methods: Eleven electronic databases were searched from database inception to June 2022. Two reviewers independently performed study screening and data extraction. The risk of bias (RoB) in the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration RoB 2 tool. Results: The searches yielded 1478 citations, of which 30 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Twenty-two of the 30 included studies utilized the motor-cognitive type of DT for training, while six used motor-motor and two utilized cognitive–cognitive DT. The included studies reported 20 different theories to explain the effectiveness of DT for improving balance and reducing falls in older adults. The predominant theory identified in the included studies was attention theory ( n = 14). Overall, 26 studies reported improved balance and five studies found a reduction in fall incidence following DT training. Balance and falls improved significantly in 15 motor-cognitive DT intervention studies. Conclusion: Attention shifting between two tasks is reported to occur following DT training. Motor-cognitive DT training improves balance and reduces fall incidence in older adults by shifting attention based on the difficulty and priority of a task from the motor to the cognitive task.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad Jobair Khan & Priya Kannan & Thomson Wai-Lung Wong & Kenneth N. K. Fong & Stanley John Winser, 2022. "A Systematic Review Exploring the Theories Underlying the Improvement of Balance and Reduction in Falls Following Dual-Task Training among Older Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-33, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:24:p:16890-:d:1004989
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/24/16890/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/24/16890/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kochaphan Phirom & Teerawat Kamnardsiri & Somporn Sungkarat, 2020. "Beneficial Effects of Interactive Physical-Cognitive Game-Based Training on Fall Risk and Cognitive Performance of Older Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-12, August.
    2. Regina R. Buccello-Stout & Jacob J. Bloomberg & Helen S. Cohen & Elbert B. Whorton & Gayle D. Weaver & Ronita L. Cromwell, 2008. "Effects of Sensorimotor Adaptation Training on Functional Mobility in Older Adults," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 63(5), pages 295-300.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ae-Ri Jung & Dasom Kim & Eun-A Park, 2021. "Cognitive Intervention Using Information and Communication Technology for Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Bárbara-Mariana Gutiérrez-Pérez & Antonio-Víctor Martín-García & Alicia Murciano-Hueso & Ana-Paula Oliveira Cardoso, 2023. "Use of serious games with older adults: systematic literature review," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Puntarik Keawtep & Wanachaporn Wichayanrat & Sirinun Boripuntakul & Siriporn C. Chattipakorn & Somporn Sungkarat, 2022. "Cognitive Benefits of Physical Exercise, Physical–Cognitive Training, and Technology-Based Intervention in Obese Individuals with and without Postmenopausal Condition: A Narrative Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-15, October.
    4. Longhai Zhang & Jiawei Guo & Jing Zhang & Ling Zhang & Yanbing Li & Shutong Yang & Wenfei Zhu & Fei Guo, 2023. "Interactive Cognitive Motor Training: A Promising Approach for Sustainable Improvement of Balance in Older Adults," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-15, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:24:p:16890-:d:1004989. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.