IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i24p16734-d1002107.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital Forms of Commensality in the 21st Century: A Scoping Review

Author

Listed:
  • Maína Ribeiro Pereira-Castro

    (Graduate Program in Collective Health, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil
    Study Group in Communication, Culture, Technology, and Food—COMTELA, School of Education and Health Sciences, University Center of Brasília, Brasília 70790-075, Brazil)

  • Adriano Gomes Pinto

    (Study Group in Communication, Culture, Technology, and Food—COMTELA, School of Education and Health Sciences, University Center of Brasília, Brasília 70790-075, Brazil)

  • Tamila Raposo Caixeta

    (Residency Program in Public Health Policy Management, Fiocruz School of Government, Fiocruz, Brasília 70904-130, Brazil)

  • Renata Alves Monteiro

    (Department of Nutrition, School of Health Sciences, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil)

  • Ximena Pamela Díaz Bermúdez

    (Graduate Program in Collective Health, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil)

  • Ana Valéria Machado Mendonça

    (Graduate Program in Collective Health, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil)

Abstract

The social act of eating together has been influenced and mediated by technologies in recent decades. This phenomenon has been investigated in different academic fields, but the topic is still in an incipient dimension, and there is a lack of consensus regarding terminology and definitions. The study aimed to characterize the main scientific findings regarding digital forms of commensality in the 21st century and to identify possible relationships between these practices and public health. A scoping review was conducted to identify papers published in different languages between 2001 and 2021. A total of 104 publications that combined commensality and technology in all contexts were included. Most studies were qualitative; from the Design and Technology field; used social media and video platforms or prototypes/augmented reality gadgets; and used different terms to refer to digital forms of commensality, allowing the analysis of the construction of field definitions over time. The intersections with health were observed from impacts on family/community engagement, culinary skills development, and mental health and eating habits. These practices also structured specific social interactions, such as virtual food communities and commensality, during the COVID-19 pandemic. This paper indicates the consistent growth of these practices and recommends the development of future research for theoretically and longitudinally deeper evaluations of the impacts of these new ways of eating together, especially regarding their effects on human health.

Suggested Citation

  • Maína Ribeiro Pereira-Castro & Adriano Gomes Pinto & Tamila Raposo Caixeta & Renata Alves Monteiro & Ximena Pamela Díaz Bermúdez & Ana Valéria Machado Mendonça, 2022. "Digital Forms of Commensality in the 21st Century: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-22, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:24:p:16734-:d:1002107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/24/16734/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/24/16734/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Henrik Scander & Agneta Yngve & Maria Lennernäs Wiklund, 2021. "Assessing Commensality in Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-22, March.
    2. Håkan Jönsson & Maxime Michaud & Nicklas Neuman, 2021. "What Is Commensality? A Critical Discussion of an Expanding Research Field," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-17, June.
    3. Henrik Scander & Maria Lennernäs Wiklund & Agneta Yngve, 2021. "Assessing Time of Eating in Commensality Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-13, March.
    4. Jiye Kim & Saegyeol Choi & Hyekyeong Kim & Soontae An, 2021. "Binge Drinking and Obesity-Related Eating: The Moderating Roles of the Eating Broadcast Viewing Experience among Korean Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-14, July.
    5. Pereira, Beulah & Sung, Billy & Lee, Sean, 2019. "I like watching other people eat: A cross-cultural analysis of the antecedents of attitudes towards Mukbang," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 78-90.
    6. Karen Glanz & Jessica J. Metcalfe & Sara C. Folta & Alison Brown & Barbara Fiese, 2021. "Diet and Health Benefits Associated with In-Home Eating and Sharing Meals at Home: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-19, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Håkan Jönsson & Maxime Michaud & Nicklas Neuman, 2021. "What Is Commensality? A Critical Discussion of an Expanding Research Field," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Kagan Kircaburun & Evita March & Sabah Balta & Emrah Emirtekin & Tarık Kışla & Mark D. Griffiths, 2022. "The Role of Procrastination Between Personality Traits and Addictive Mukbang Watching Among Emerging Adults," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, March.
    3. Carmen Cipriano-Crespo & Francesc-Xavier Medina & Lorenzo Mariano-Juárez, 2022. "Culinary Solitude in the Diet of People with Functional Diversity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-13, March.
    4. Rahab Sohail & Hayder Hasan & Roba Saqan & Asmaa Barakji & Aisha Khan & Faaiza Sadiq & Shouq Furany & Zaina AlShaikh & Omar Atef Abdelhamid Mahmoud & Hadia Radwan, 2024. "The Influence of the Home Food Environment on the Eating Behaviors, Family Meals, and Academic Achievement of Adolescents in Schools in the UAE," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(9), pages 1-13, September.
    5. Ryan, Rebecca M. & Gassman-Pines, Anna & Steimle, Samantha & Baker, Garrett & Hines, Caitlin T. & Johnson, Anna D., 2023. "The role of public and private food assistance in supporting families’ food security and meal routines," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    6. Jia, Jun-Jun & Zhu, Mengshu & Wei, Chu, 2022. "Household cooking in the context of carbon neutrality: A machine-learning-based review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    7. Henrik Scander & Maria Lennernäs Wiklund & Agneta Yngve, 2021. "Assessing Time of Eating in Commensality Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-13, March.
    8. Jiye Kim & Saegyeol Choi & Hyekyeong Kim & Soontae An, 2021. "Binge Drinking and Obesity-Related Eating: The Moderating Roles of the Eating Broadcast Viewing Experience among Korean Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-14, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:24:p:16734-:d:1002107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.