IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i23p15535-d981538.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sensitivity of Pathogenic Bacteria Strains to Treated Mine Water

Author

Listed:
  • Catalina Stoica

    (National Research and Development Institute for Industrial Ecology–ECOIND, 57-73 Drumul Podu Dambovitei, Sector 6, 060652 Bucharest, Romania
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Laurentiu Razvan Dinu

    (National Research and Development Institute for Industrial Ecology–ECOIND, 57-73 Drumul Podu Dambovitei, Sector 6, 060652 Bucharest, Romania
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Irina Eugenia Lucaciu

    (National Research and Development Institute for Industrial Ecology–ECOIND, 57-73 Drumul Podu Dambovitei, Sector 6, 060652 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Voicu Oncu

    (SC CEPROMIN S.A., 22 Decembrie 37A Boulevard, 330166 Deva, Romania)

  • Stefania Gheorghe

    (National Research and Development Institute for Industrial Ecology–ECOIND, 57-73 Drumul Podu Dambovitei, Sector 6, 060652 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Mihai Nita-Lazar

    (National Research and Development Institute for Industrial Ecology–ECOIND, 57-73 Drumul Podu Dambovitei, Sector 6, 060652 Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

Mine water as a result of meteoric and/or underground water’s contact with tailings and underground workings could have an elevated content of metals associated with sulfate, often acidic, due to the bio-oxidation of sulfides. When entering aquatic ecosystems, the mine water can cause significant changes in the species’ trophic levels, therefore a treatment is required to adjust the alkalinity and to remove the heavy metals and metalloids. The conventional mine water treatment removes metals, but in many cases it does not reduce the sulfate content. This paper aimed to predict the impact of conventionally treated mine water on the receiving river by assessing the genotoxic activity on an engineered Escherichia coli and by evaluating the toxic effects generated on two Gram-negative bacterial strains, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli . Although the main chemical impact is the severe increases of calcium and sulfate concentrations, no significant genotoxic characteristics were detected on the Escherichia coli strain and on the cell-viability with a positive survival rate higher than 80%. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was more resistant than Escherichia coli in the presence of 1890 mg SO 4 2− /L. This paper reveals different sensitivities and adaptabilities of pathogenic bacteria to high concentrations of sulfates in mine waters.

Suggested Citation

  • Catalina Stoica & Laurentiu Razvan Dinu & Irina Eugenia Lucaciu & Voicu Oncu & Stefania Gheorghe & Mihai Nita-Lazar, 2022. "Sensitivity of Pathogenic Bacteria Strains to Treated Mine Water," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-14, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:15535-:d:981538
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/15535/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/15535/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. José A. Grande & Ana Teresa Luís & Francisco Córdoba & Mercedes Leiva & José Miguel Dávila & Juan Carlos Fortes & María Santisteban & Eduardo Ferreira da Silva & Aguasanta Miguel Sarmiento, 2021. "Odiel River (SW Spain), a Singular Scenario Affected by Acid Mine Drainage (AMD): Graphical and Statistical Models to Assess Diatoms and Water Hydrogeochemistry Interactions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Ayansina Segun Ayangbenro & Olubukola Oluranti Babalola, 2017. "A New Strategy for Heavy Metal Polluted Environments: A Review of Microbial Biosorbents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yanrong Dong & Ziqing Gao & Junzhen Di & Dong Wang & Zhenhua Yang & Yunfeng Wang & Zhoufei Xie, 2023. "Study on the Effectiveness of Sulfate Reducing Bacteria to Remove Heavy Metals (Fe, Mn, Cu, Cr) in Acid Mine Drainage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-17, March.
    2. R. F. Al-Thani & B. T. Yasseen, 2023. "Possible Future Risks of Pollution Consequent to the Expansion of Oil and Gas Operations in Qatar," Environment and Pollution, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, May.
    3. Shu-chun Tseng & Chih-ming Liang & Taipau Chia & Shan-shin Ton, 2021. "Changes in the Composition of the Soil Bacterial Community in Heavy Metal-Contaminated Farmland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-15, August.
    4. Nur Syahirah Zulkafflee & Nurul Adillah Mohd Redzuan & Sara Nematbakhsh & Jinap Selamat & Mohd Razi Ismail & Sarva Mangala Praveena & Soo Yee Lee & Ahmad Faizal Abdull Razis, 2022. "Heavy Metal Contamination in Oryza sativa L. at the Eastern Region of Malaysia and Its Risk Assessment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-22, January.
    5. Jiao Zhang & Pan Wang & Zhiqiang Zhang & Pengyu Xiang & Siqing Xia, 2020. "Biosorption Characteristics of Hg(II) from Aqueous Solution by the Biopolymer from Waste Activated Sludge," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-9, February.
    6. Ana Teresa Luís & José Antonio Grande & Nuno Durães & María Santisteban & Ángel Mariano Rodríguez-Pérez & Eduardo Ferreira da Silva, 2022. "Acid Mine Drainage Effects in the Hydrobiology of Freshwater Streams from Three Mining Areas (SW Portugal): A Statistical Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-10, August.
    7. Shiva Aliyari Rad & Khatereh Nobaharan & Neda Pashapoor & Janhvi Pandey & Zahra Dehghanian & Venkatramanan Senapathi & Tatiana Minkina & Wenjie Ren & Vishnu D. Rajput & Behnam Asgari Lajayer, 2023. "Nano-Microbial Remediation of Polluted Soil: A Brief Insight," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, January.
    8. Carolina Faccio Demarco & Maurízio Silveira Quadro & Filipe Selau Carlos & Simone Pieniz & Luiza Beatriz Gamboa Araújo Morselli & Robson Andreazza, 2023. "Bioremediation of Aquatic Environments Contaminated with Heavy Metals: A Review of Mechanisms, Solutions and Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-15, January.
    9. Zigang Li & Peng Wang & Xiaoyu Yue & Jingtao Wang & Baozeng Ren & Lingbo Qu & Hui Han, 2019. "Effects of Bacillus thuringiensis HC-2 Combined with Biochar on the Growth and Cd and Pb Accumulation of Radish in a Heavy Metal-Contaminated Farmland under Field Conditions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-15, September.
    10. Prospero Cristhian Onofre Zapata-Mendoza & Oscar Julian Berrios-Tauccaya & Vicente Amirpasha Tirado-Kulieva & Jhony Alberto Gonzales-Malca & David Roberto Ricse-Reyes & Andres Amador Berrios-Zevallos , 2022. "Environmentally Friendly Technologies for Wastewater Treatment in Food Processing Plants: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-17, November.
    11. Stanislav E. Shmelev & Linus Agbleze & Joachim H. Spangenberg, 2023. "Multidimensional Ecosystem Mapping: Towards a More Comprehensive Spatial Assessment of Nature’s Contributions to People in France," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-32, May.
    12. Juan Carlos Camacho-Chab & María Del Refugio Castañeda-Chávez & Manuel Jesús Chan-Bacab & Ruth Noemí Aguila-Ramírez & Itzel Galaviz-Villa & Pascual Bartolo-Pérez & Fabiola Lango-Reynoso & Carolina Tab, 2018. "Biosorption of Cadmium by Non-Toxic Extracellular Polymeric Substances (EPS) Synthesized by Bacteria from Marine Intertidal Biofilms," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-11, February.
    13. Ghulam Abbas & Behzad Murtaza & Irshad Bibi & Muhammad Shahid & Nabeel Khan Niazi & Muhammad Imran Khan & Muhammad Amjad & Munawar Hussain & Natasha, 2018. "Arsenic Uptake, Toxicity, Detoxification, and Speciation in Plants: Physiological, Biochemical, and Molecular Aspects," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-45, January.
    14. Marcin Pigłowski, 2018. "Heavy Metals in Notifications of Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-13, February.
    15. Omena Bernard Ojuederie & Olubukola Oluranti Babalola, 2017. "Microbial and Plant-Assisted Bioremediation of Heavy Metal Polluted Environments: A Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-26, December.
    16. Siavash Iravani & Rajender S. Varma, 2022. "Genetically Engineered Organisms: Possibilities and Challenges of Heavy Metal Removal and Nanoparticle Synthesis," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-10, June.
    17. Mengjie Wu & Hongyu Liu & Chunping Yang, 2019. "Effects of Pretreatment Methods of Wheat Straw on Adsorption of Cd(II) from Waterlogged Paddy Soil," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-21, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:15535-:d:981538. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.