IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i22p15317-d978109.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Ecological Service Function of Liquidambar formosana Plantations

Author

Listed:
  • Jingdong Wu

    (College of Forestry, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China)

  • Mingxu Wang

    (The Forestry Department of Hunan Province, Changsha 410004, China)

  • Tingting Wang

    (College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China)

  • Xinxi Fu

    (College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China)

Abstract

A Liquidambar formosana plantation is a kind of fast-grown forest in the subtropical region, providing a variety of ecosystem services such as superior wood, carbon fixation and oxygen release, and biodiversity maintenance. However, the ecological service function value of Liquidambar formosana plantations is not clear. To gain insights into the characteristics and importance of its ecological and economic benefits, the Liquidambar formosana plantation in the Tianjiling Forest Farm of Changsha City was taken as the specific research object in this paper. The ecological service function evaluation index system for Liquidambar formosana plantations was established based on the relevant research worldwide and the actual situation. The market value method, shadow engineering method, carbon tax method, and other environmental economics methods were used to estimate the value of seven ecological service functions (including organic matter production, carbon fixation and oxygen release, water conservation, soil conservation, soil improvement, air purification, and biodiversity maintenance) of the forest of Liquidambar formosana . The results indicated that the total economic value of ecological service function provided by the Liquidambar formosana plantation of Changsha was 103,277.82 RMB/(hm 2 ·a), and the indirect economic value was 8.47 times that of the direct economic value. Among the seven ecological service functions, the value of carbon fixation and oxygen release was the highest (36,703.33 RMB·hm −2 ·a −1 ), thus suggesting that the Liquidambar formosana plantation had strong photosynthesis and significant carbon fixation. This study directly reflects the value of forest ecological service function in the form of currency, which is beneficial to provide more insights into forest ecological service function so as to provide basic data and a scientific basis for the protection, construction, and promotion of the sustainable utilization and development of urban forest resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Jingdong Wu & Mingxu Wang & Tingting Wang & Xinxi Fu, 2022. "Evaluation of Ecological Service Function of Liquidambar formosana Plantations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-16, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:22:p:15317-:d:978109
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/15317/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/15317/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rongkui Su & Qiqi Ou & Hanqing Wang & Yiting Luo & Xiangrong Dai & Yangyang Wang & Yonghua Chen & Lei Shi, 2022. "Comparison of Phytoremediation Potential of Nerium indicum with Inorganic Modifier Calcium Carbonate and Organic Modifier Mushroom Residue to Lead–Zinc Tailings," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-15, August.
    2. Ninan, K.N. & Inoue, Makoto, 2013. "Valuing forest ecosystem services: Case study of a forest reserve in Japan," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 5(C), pages 78-87.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jia Xiang & Junjun Niu, 2025. "Ecological Compensation and Comprehensive Zoning of Cultivated Land Based on Ecosystem Service Value and Extended Three-Dimensional Ecological Footprint Model: A Case Study of Shandong Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-34, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rongkui Su & Hongguo Zhang & Feng Chen & Zhenxing Wang & Lei Huang, 2022. "Applications of Single Atom Catalysts for Environmental Management," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-6, September.
    2. Jaina, Avinash & Chandrab, Girish & Nautiyalb, Raman, 2017. "Valuating intangible benefits from afforested areas: A case study in India," Economia Agraria y Recursos Naturales, Spanish Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 17(01), June.
    3. Múcio Magno de Melo Farnezi & Enilson de Barros Silva & Lauana Lopes dos Santos & Alexandre Christofaro Silva & Paulo Henrique Grazziotti & Luís Reynaldo Ferracciú Alleoni & Wesley Costa Silva & Angel, 2022. "Potential of Forage Grasses in Phytoremediation of Lead through Production of Phytoliths in Contaminated Soils," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, December.
    4. Adam P. Hejnowicz & Murray A. Rudd, 2017. "The Value Landscape in Ecosystem Services: Value, Value Wherefore Art Thou Value?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-34, May.
    5. Raviv, Orna & Shiri, Zemah-Shamir & Ido, Izhaki & Alon, Lotan, 2021. "The effect of wildfire and land-cover changes on the economic value of ecosystem services in Mount Carmel Biosphere Reserve, Israel," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    6. Taye, Fitalew Agimass & Folkersen, Maja Vinde & Fleming, Christopher M. & Buckwell, Andrew & Mackey, Brendan & Diwakar, K.C. & Le, Dung & Hasan, Syezlin & Ange, Chantal Saint, 2021. "The economic values of global forest ecosystem services: A meta-analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    7. Zohreh Miripanah & Mohsen Tavakoli & Mahmoud Rostaminya & Mostafa Naderi, 2019. "Carbon sequestration via afforestation as a sustainable action to mitigate climate change in Western Iran," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 43(3), pages 194-202, August.
    8. Shoyama, Kikuko & Kamiyama, Chiho & Morimoto, Junko & Ooba, Makoto & Okuro, Toshiya, 2017. "A review of modeling approaches for ecosystem services assessment in the Asian region," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 26(PB), pages 316-328.
    9. Hanlin Feng & Jiemin Cheng, 2023. "Whole-Process Risk Management of Soil Amendments for Remediation of Heavy Metals in Agricultural Soil—A Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-14, January.
    10. Ruan, Xinling & Ge, Shiji & Jiao, Zhiqiang & Zhan, Wenhao & Wang, Yangyang, 2023. "Bioaccumulation and risk assessment of potential toxic elements in the soil-vegetable system as influenced by historical wastewater irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    11. Rongkui Su & Tianzhi Xie & Haisong Yao & Yonghua Chen & Hanqing Wang & Xiangrong Dai & Yangyang Wang & Lei Shi & Yiting Luo, 2022. "Lead Responses and Tolerance Mechanisms of Koelreuteria paniculata : A Newly Potential Plant for Sustainable Phytoremediation of Pb-Contaminated Soil," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-16, November.
    12. Carolina Faccio Demarco & Maurízio Silveira Quadro & Filipe Selau Carlos & Simone Pieniz & Luiza Beatriz Gamboa Araújo Morselli & Robson Andreazza, 2023. "Bioremediation of Aquatic Environments Contaminated with Heavy Metals: A Review of Mechanisms, Solutions and Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-15, January.
    13. Komeil JAHANIFAR & Hamid AMIRNEJAD & Zahra ABEDI & Alireza VAFAEINEJAD, 2017. "Estimation of the value of forest ecosystem services to develop conservational strategy management (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats)," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(7), pages 300-312.
    14. Mauerhofer, Volker, 2018. "Identifying Legal Priorities for Policy Making: A Forest-society-economy Context Analysed by 3-D Sustainability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 183-190.
    15. Hossein Safaei & Mohadeseh Ghanbari Motlagh & Mahmoudreza Khorshidian & Saeed Malmasi, 2022. "Introducing a process to select the appropriate dam compensation option based on ecosystem services," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(11), pages 13011-13034, November.
    16. Sitong Gong & Hu Wang & Fei Lou & Ran Qin & Tianling Fu, 2022. "Calcareous Materials Effectively Reduce the Accumulation of Cd in Potatoes in Acidic Cadmium-Contaminated Farmland Soils in Mining Areas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-14, September.
    17. Qianrong Jiang & Honglei Chen & Zeding Fu & Xiaohua Fu & Jiacheng Wang & Yingqi Liang & Hailong Yin & Junbo Yang & Jie Jiang & Xinxin Yang & He Wang & Zhiming Liu & Rongkui Su, 2022. "Current Progress, Challenges and Perspectives in the Microalgal-Bacterial Aerobic Granular Sludge Process: A Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-19, October.
    18. Kibria, Abu S.M.G. & Behie, Alison & Costanza, Robert & Groves, Colin & Farrell, Tracy, 2017. "The value of ecosystem services obtained from the protected forest of Cambodia: The case of Veun Sai-Siem Pang National Park," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 26(PA), pages 27-36.
    19. Margarita Ignatyeva & Vera Yurak & Natalia Pustokhina, 2020. "Recultivation of Post-Mining Disturbed Land: Review of Content and Comparative Law and Feasibility Study," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-17, June.
    20. Richard Yao & David Palmer & Barbara Hock & Duncan Harrison & Tim Payn & Juan Monge, 2019. "Forest Investment Framework as a Support Tool for the Sustainable Management of Planted Forests," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-22, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:22:p:15317-:d:978109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.