IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i22p14984-d972150.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pathways to Environmental Inequality: How Urban Traffic Noise Annoyance Varies across Socioeconomic Subgroups

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Preisendörfer

    (Institute of Sociology, University of Mainz, Jakob-Welder-Weg 12, D-55128 Mainz, Germany)

  • Heidi Bruderer Enzler

    (School of Social Work, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Pfingstweidstr. 96, CH-8037 Zurich, Switzerland)

  • Andreas Diekmann

    (Environmental Research Group, ETH Zurich, WEP H18, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
    Institute of Sociology, University of Leipzig, Beethovenstr. 15, D-04107 Leipzig, Germany)

  • Jörg Hartmann

    (Research Centre Global Dynamics, University of Leipzig, Strohsackpassage, D-04109 Leipzig, Germany)

  • Karin Kurz

    (Institute of Sociology, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Platz der Göttinger Sieben 3, D-37073 Göttingen, Germany)

  • Ulf Liebe

    (Department of Sociology, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK)

Abstract

The article investigates how socioeconomic background affects noise annoyance caused by residential road traffic in urban areas. It is argued that the effects of socioeconomic variables (migration background, education, and income) on noise annoyance tend to be underestimated because these effects are mainly indirect. We specify three indirect pathways. (1) A “noise exposure path” assumes that less privileged households are exposed to a higher level of noise and therefore experience stronger annoyance. (2) A “housing attributes path” argues that less privileged households can shield themselves less effectively from noise due to unfavorable housing conditions and that this contributes to annoyance. (3) Conversely, an “environmental susceptibility path” proposes that less privileged people are less concerned about the environment and have a lower noise sensitivity, and that this reduces their noise annoyance. Our analyses rest on a study carried out in four European cities (Mainz and Hanover in Germany, Bern and Zurich in Switzerland), and the results support the empirical validity of the three indirect pathways.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Preisendörfer & Heidi Bruderer Enzler & Andreas Diekmann & Jörg Hartmann & Karin Kurz & Ulf Liebe, 2022. "Pathways to Environmental Inequality: How Urban Traffic Noise Annoyance Varies across Socioeconomic Subgroups," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-18, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:22:p:14984-:d:972150
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/14984/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/14984/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stefanie Dreger & Steffen Andreas Schüle & Lisa Karla Hilz & Gabriele Bolte, 2019. "Social Inequalities in Environmental Noise Exposure: A Review of Evidence in the WHO European Region," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Natalie Riedel & Joachim Scheiner & Grit M�ller & Heike K�ckler, 2014. "Assessing the relationship between objective and subjective indicators of residential exposure to road traffic noise in the context of environmental justice," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(9), pages 1398-1421, September.
    3. H. Spencer Banzhaf & Lala Ma & Christopher Timmins, 2019. "Environmental Justice: Establishing Causal Relationships," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 11(1), pages 377-398, October.
    4. Rainer Guski & Dirk Schreckenberg & Rudolf Schuemer, 2017. "WHO Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region: A Systematic Review on Environmental Noise and Annoyance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-39, December.
    5. Enembe Oku Okokon & Anu W. Turunen & Sari Ung-Lanki & Anna-Kaisa Vartiainen & Pekka Tiittanen & Timo Lanki, 2015. "Road-Traffic Noise: Annoyance, Risk Perception, and Noise Sensitivity in the Finnish Adult Population," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-23, May.
    6. Truls Gjestland, 2020. "On the Temporal Stability of People’s Annoyance with Road Traffic Noise," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-14, February.
    7. Spencer Banzhaf & Lala Ma & Christopher Timmins, 2019. "Environmental Justice: The Economics of Race, Place, and Pollution," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 33(1), pages 185-208, Winter.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ulf Liebe & Heidi Bruderer Enzler & Andreas Diekmann & Peter Preisendörfer, 2024. "One Justice for All? Social Dilemmas, Environmental Risks and Different Notions of Distributive Justice," Games, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-23, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hausman, Catherine & Stolper, Samuel, 2021. "Inequality, information failures, and air pollution," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    2. Ivan Rudik & Derek Lemoine & Antonia Marcheva, 2024. "Equity and Efficiency in the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law’s Adaptation Investments," NBER Chapters, in: Environmental and Energy Policy and the Economy, volume 6, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Timmins, Christopher & Vissing, Ashley, 2022. "Environmental justice and Coasian bargaining: The role of race, ethnicity, and income in lease negotiations for shale gas," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    4. Janice Hegewald & Melanie Schubert & Alice Freiberg & Karla Romero Starke & Franziska Augustin & Steffi G. Riedel-Heller & Hajo Zeeb & Andreas Seidler, 2020. "Traffic Noise and Mental Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-26, August.
    5. Li, Liqing, 2023. "Environmental goods provision and gentrification: Evidence from MillionTreesNYC," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    6. Claire Conzelmann & Jeremy Hoffman & Toan Phan & Arianna Salazar-Miranda, 2022. "Long-term Effects of Redlining on Environmental Risk Exposure," Working Paper 22-09R, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond.
    7. Aguilar-Gómez , Sandra & Cárdenas, Juan Camilo & Salas Díaz, Ricardo, 2024. "Environmental Justice Beyond Race: Skin Tone and Exposure to Air Pollution," Documentos CEDE 21042, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    8. Zhang, Ruohao & Li, Huan & Khanna, Neha, 2021. "Environmental justice and the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from New York State," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    9. Antonio J. Torija & Charlotte Clark, 2021. "A Psychoacoustic Approach to Building Knowledge about Human Response to Noise of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-16, January.
    10. Natalie Riedel & Heike Köckler & Joachim Scheiner & Irene Van Kamp & Raimund Erbel & Adrian Loerbroks & Thomas Claßen & Gabriele Bolte, 2018. "Home as a Place of Noise Control for the Elderly? A Cross-Sectional Study on Potential Mediating Effects and Associations between Road Traffic Noise Exposure, Access to a Quiet Side, Dwelling-Related ," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-22, May.
    11. Bach Lien Trieu & Thu Lan Nguyen & Yasuhiro Hiraguri & Makoto Morinaga & Takashi Morihara, 2021. "How Does a Community Respond to Changes in Aircraft Noise? A Comparison of Two Surveys Conducted 11 Years Apart in Ho Chi Minh City," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-21, April.
    12. Victor Vasnetsov & Siona Pramoda & Isabella Muradyan & Meghna Pramoda & Catherine Vasnetsov & Mariam Muradyan & Constantine Svoronos & Ksenia Romanov, 0000. "Comparative Analysis of Environmental Justice in US Hispanic Communities of Puerto Rico and New Mexico State," Proceedings of Economics and Finance Conferences 14316261, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    13. Rüttenauer, Tobias & Best, Henning, 2021. "Consistent Inequality across Germany? Exploring Spatial Heterogeneity in the Unequal Distribution of Air Pollution," SocArXiv 5tavs, Center for Open Science.
    14. Colby, Bonnie, 2023. "Teaching Water Resource Economics for Policy Analysis," Applied Economics Teaching Resources (AETR), Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 5(3), September.
    15. Vincent Cheruiyot Kirui1 & Dr. Paul Kipyegon Sang, 2020. "The Quest for Socioeconomic Development in Kenya: A Review of the Impact of Public Infrastructure on the Voyage," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 4(11), pages 145-158, November.
    16. Wang Chang & Yun Zhu & Che-Jen Lin & Saravanan Arunachalam & Shuxiao Wang & Jia Xing & Tingting Fang & Shicheng Long & Jinying Li & Geng Chen, 2022. "Environmental Justice Assessment of Fine Particles, Ozone, and Mercury over the Pearl River Delta Region, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-15, August.
    17. Truls Gjestland, 2020. "On the Temporal Stability of People’s Annoyance with Road Traffic Noise," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-14, February.
    18. Liotta,Charlotte & Avner,Paolo & Viguié,Vincent & Selod,Harris & Hallegatte,Stephane, 2022. "Climate Policy and Inequality in Urban Areas : Beyond Incomes," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10185, The World Bank.
    19. Tihitina Andarge & Yongjie Ji & Bonnie L. Keeler & David A. Keiser & Conor McKenzie, 2023. "Environmental Justice and the Clean Water Act: Implications for Economic Analyses of Clean Water Regulations," NBER Chapters, in: Environmental and Energy Policy and the Economy, volume 5, pages 70-126, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Can Zou & Jun Tai & Li Chen & Yue Che, 2020. "An Environmental Justice Assessment of the Waste Treatment Facilities in Shanghai: Incorporating Counterfactual Decomposition into the Hedonic Price Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-12, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:22:p:14984-:d:972150. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.