IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i20p13133-d940290.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“All Hands on Deck”: Psychological Characteristics of Women with Experience of Oncological Disease Participating in Sailing Cruise—A Pilot Study

Author

Listed:
  • Julia Wyszomirska

    (Department of Psychology, Chair of Social Sciences and Humanities, School of Health Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, 40-752 Katowice, Poland)

  • Monika Bąk-Sosnowska

    (Department of Health Sciences, WSB University, 41-300 Dąbrowa Górnicza, Poland)

  • Adriana Modrzejewska

    (Department of Psychology, Chair of Social Sciences and Humanities, School of Health Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, 40-752 Katowice, Poland)

Abstract

Background: In addition to searching for effective methods of treatment, interventions are sought to support well-being, quality of life, mental health, and recovery. Sailing has its specific features, including task orientation, challenges, contact with people, and nature. This specificity may be treated as a potential therapeutic factor, but it is also likely that people with certain psychological characteristics are involved in it. Therefore, the study aimed to assess some psychological features of women with cancer experience who decided to take part in the Onco-Cruise (Polish: Onko-Rejs). Methods: Participants were 56 women (M = 46.73; SD = 9.21). We used NEO-FFI, the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory, and The Multidimensional Health Locus of Control Scale. Results: Onco-Cruises participants were characterized by a high level of extraversion (M = 32.48; SD = 7.02; sten score M = 7.21; Mo = 7), openness (M = 31.50; SD = 6.31; sten score M = 7.41; Mo = 8), low neuroticism (M = 21.62; SD = 9.33; sten score M = 4.96), predominance of present hedonistic (M = 12.55, SD = 1.46) and future time perspective (M = 11.39; SD = 2.67), and the internal health locus of control (M = 23.25, SD = 5.43). Conclusion: Group sailing can be favorable for broadly understood health and cancer recovery, but people who choose this activity have certain psychological predispositions, especially indicating high needs for stimulation. Permanent features should be taken into account when proposing various interventions for oncology patients to best suit them to their natural possibilities and preferences and, thus, make them most effective.

Suggested Citation

  • Julia Wyszomirska & Monika Bąk-Sosnowska & Adriana Modrzejewska, 2022. "“All Hands on Deck”: Psychological Characteristics of Women with Experience of Oncological Disease Participating in Sailing Cruise—A Pilot Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-15, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:20:p:13133-:d:940290
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/20/13133/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/20/13133/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Weijiao Zhou & Seoyoon Woo & Janet L. Larson, 2020. "Effects of perioperative exercise interventions on lung cancer patients: An overview of systematic reviews," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(23-24), pages 4482-4504, December.
    2. Kathryn E. Flynn & Maureen A. Smith, 2007. "Personality and Health Care Decision-Making Style," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 62(5), pages 261-267.
    3. Marko Neeme & Anu Aavik & Toivo Aavik & Margus Punab, 2015. "Personality and Utilization of Prostate Cancer Testing," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(3), pages 21582440155, July.
    4. Daniela Mirandola & Giovanna Franchi & Alice Maruelli & Manuela Vinci & Maria Grazia Muraca & Guido Miccinesi & Mirko Manetti & Mirca Marini, 2020. "Tailored Sailing Experience to Reduce Psychological Distress and Improve the Quality of Life of Breast Cancer Survivors: A Survey-Based Pilot Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-8, June.
    5. Jia Zhang & Ryan Howell & Maciej Stolarski, 2013. "Comparing Three Methods to Measure a Balanced Time Perspective: The Relationship Between a Balanced Time Perspective and Subjective Well-Being," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 169-184, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bozena Burzynska-Tatjewska & Gerald Matthews & Maciej Stolarski, 2022. "Seeking Causality in the Links between Time Perspectives and Gratitude, Savoring the Moment and Prioritizing Positivity: Initial Empirical Test of Three Conceptual Models," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-20, April.
    2. Itumeleng P. Khumalo & Angelina Wilson-Fadiji & Symen A. Brouwers, 2020. "Well-Being Orientations and Time Perspective Across Cultural Tightness–Looseness Latent Classes in Africa," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 1681-1703, June.
    3. Tao Chen & Lu-lu Liu & Ji-fang Cui & Xiao-jing Qin & Hai-song Shi & Muireann Irish & Ya Wang, 2021. "Balanced Time Perspective and Life Satisfaction: The Mediating Role of “Temporal Negative Affect”," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 2563-2574, August.
    4. Andrew E. Reed & Joseph A. Mikels & Corinna E. Lockenhoff, 2012. "Choosing with confidence: Self-efficacy and preferences for choice," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 7(2), pages 173-180, March.
    5. Bonsang, Eric & Costa-Font, Joan, 2022. "Buying control? ‘Locus of control’ and the uptake of supplementary health insurance," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 476-489.
    6. Dhar Chowdhuri, Praheli & Meyur, Suman, 2018. "Exploration of Personality Factors and their Effects on People’s Decision Making of Complementary and Alternative Medicine," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 5(2(4)), pages 120-125.
    7. Joseph L Saenz & Sadaf Arefi Milani & Silvia Mejía-Arango, 2023. "Gender, Personality, and Cognitive Resilience Against Early-Life Disadvantage," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 78(5), pages 913-924.
    8. Maria C. Gugliandolo & Sebastiano Costa & Mariagrazia Lo Cricchio & Francesca Liga, 2021. "Exploring the Role of Time Perspective in Emerging Adult Couples: A Mediation Model," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 22(7), pages 3221-3239, October.
    9. Aneta Przepiorka & Nicolson Yat-fan Siu & Małgorzata Szcześniak & Celina Timoszyk-Tomczak & Jacqueline Jiaying Le & Mónica Pino Muñoz, 2020. "The Relation Between Personality, Time Perspective and Positive Orientation in Chile, Hong Kong, and Poland," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 1081-1101, March.
    10. repec:cup:judgdm:v:7:y:2012:i:2:p:173-180 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Maciej Stolarski & Gerald Matthews & Sławomir Postek & Philip Zimbardo & Joanna Bitner, 2014. "How We Feel is a Matter of Time: Relationships Between Time Perspectives and Mood," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 809-827, August.
    12. Bozena Burzynska-Tatjewska & Maciej Stolarski, 2022. "Leaving Past Adversities Behind: Gratitude Intervention Compensates for the Undesirable Effects of Past Time Perspectives on Negative Affect," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-12, October.
    13. Rönnlund, Michael & Carelli, Maria Grazia, 2018. "Deviations from a balanced time perspective in late adulthood: Associations with current g and g in youth," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 8-16.
    14. John L. Perry & Elizabeth C. Temple & Frank C. Worrell & Urška Zivkovic & Zena R. Mello & Bojan Musil & Jon C. Cole & Michael T. McKay, 2020. "Different Version, Similar Result? A Critical Analysis of the Multiplicity of Shortened Versions of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, May.
    15. Yuexi Yang & Tingting Qu & Jinyue Yang & Ben Ma & Anli Leng, 2022. "Confucian Familism and Shared Decision Making in End-of-Life Care for Patients with Advanced Cancers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-14, August.
    16. Li Li & Jinhui Li, 2021. "An Investigation of Factors Influencing Chinese Young Women’s Intention for Mammography Screening," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
    17. Allison P. Sederlund & Lawrence R. Burns & William Rogers, 2020. "Multidimensional Models of Perfectionism and Procrastination: Seeking Determinants of Both," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-32, July.
    18. Ulrich Wiesmann & Ilka Ballas & Hans-Joachim Hannich, 2018. "Sense of Coherence, Time Perspective and Positive Aging," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 817-839, March.
    19. Julia Wyszomirska & Monika Bąk-Sosnowska, 2023. "Time Goes Back—Time Perspective in Polish Men with Compulsive Sexual Behavior Disorder and Risky Sexual Behavior," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-21, March.
    20. Pedro Güell & Macarena Orchard & Martina Yopo & Álvaro Jiménez-Molina, 2015. "Time Perspectives and Subjective Wellbeing in Chile," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 123(1), pages 127-141, August.
    21. Xinwen Bi & Shuqiong Wang & Yanhong Ji, 2022. "Parental Autonomy Granting and Adolescents’ Life Satisfaction: The Mediating Roles of Emotional Self-Efficacy and Future Orientation," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 2113-2135, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:20:p:13133-:d:940290. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.