IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i19p12911-d936909.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Addressing Psychosocial Factors in Cognitive Impairment Screening from a Holistic Perspective: The DeCo-Booklet Methodology Design and Pilot Study

Author

Listed:
  • Cristina García

    (Cátedra DeCo MICOF-CEU UCH, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, 46115 Valencia, Spain
    Department of Pharmacy, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, 46115 Valencia, Spain
    Community Pharmacist, 02161 Albacete, Spain)

  • Lucrecia Moreno

    (Cátedra DeCo MICOF-CEU UCH, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, 46115 Valencia, Spain
    Department of Pharmacy, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, 46115 Valencia, Spain)

  • Mónica Alacreu

    (Cátedra DeCo MICOF-CEU UCH, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, 46115 Valencia, Spain
    Embedded Systems and Artificial Intelligence Group, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, 46115 Valencia, Spain)

  • Francisco J. Muñoz

    (Cátedra DeCo MICOF-CEU UCH, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, 46115 Valencia, Spain
    Embedded Systems and Artificial Intelligence Group, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, 46115 Valencia, Spain)

  • Luis A. Martínez

    (Cátedra DeCo MICOF-CEU UCH, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, 46115 Valencia, Spain
    Community Pharmacist, 02161 Albacete, Spain)

Abstract

Cognitive impairment (CI), an intermediate phase between the decline in physiological cognition and dementia, is known to be mediated by a variety of risk and protective factors, with age being the most influential of these. The multifactorial nature of CI and the worldwide phenomenon of an aging population makes decoupling old age from disease through the concept of healthy aging (HA) a matter of major interest. Focusing on psychosocial variables and psychological constructs, here we designed and piloted a data collection booklet (DeCo-B) to assess CI and HA from a holistic perspective. The DeCo-B comprises six sections: sociodemographic factors, CI, meaning in life, psychosocial factors, health problems, and lifestyle. The estimated prevalence of CI and HA in our cohort were 24.4% and 6.6%, respectively. Spearman correlations mainly identified pairwise associations between the meaning in life domains and psychosocial variables. Moreover, age, marital status, purpose in life, resilience, chronic pain, cognitive reserve, and obstructive sleep apnea were significantly associated with an increased risk of CI. Our results showed that DeCo-B is a suitable tool for researching how modifiable risk and protective factors influence cognitive status. The complex interrelationships between variables should be further investigated and, for practical reasons, the questionnaire should be optimized in future work.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristina García & Lucrecia Moreno & Mónica Alacreu & Francisco J. Muñoz & Luis A. Martínez, 2022. "Addressing Psychosocial Factors in Cognitive Impairment Screening from a Holistic Perspective: The DeCo-Booklet Methodology Design and Pilot Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-23, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:12911-:d:936909
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/12911/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/12911/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karsten Hank, 2011. "How "Successful" Do Older Europeans Age? Findings From SHARE," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 66(2), pages 230-236.
    2. Hernán Ramos & Lucrecia Moreno & María Gil & Gemma García-Lluch & José Sendra-Lillo & Mónica Alacreu, 2021. "Pharmacists’ Knowledge of Factors Associated with Dementia: The A-to-Z Dementia Knowledge List," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-18, September.
    3. Sara J. McLaughlin & Cathleen M Connell & Steven G. Heeringa & Lydia W. Li & J. Scott Roberts, 2010. "Successful Aging in the United States: Prevalence Estimates From a National Sample of Older Adults," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 65(2), pages 216-226.
    4. Antonovsky, Aaron, 1993. "The structure and properties of the sense of coherence scale," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 725-733, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tzu-Yu Lin & Seiichi Sakuno, 2020. "Service Quality for Sports and Active Aging in Japanese Community Sports Clubs," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-19, November.
    2. Cristina Bosch-Farré & Josep Garre-Olmo & Anna Bonmatí-Tomàs & Maria Carme Malagón-Aguilera & Sandra Gelabert-Vilella & Concepció Fuentes-Pumarola & Dolors Juvinyà-Canal, 2018. "Prevalence and related factors of Active and Healthy Ageing in Europe according to two models: Results from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-19, October.
    3. Brandt, Martina & Deindl, Christian & Hank, Karsten, 2012. "Tracing the origins of successful aging: The role of childhood conditions and social inequality in explaining later life health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(9), pages 1418-1425.
    4. Koen Decancq & Alexander Michiels, 2016. "Measuring Successful Aging with Respect For What Matters To Older Persons," Working Papers 1604, Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp.
    5. Marina Plugge, 2021. "Successful ageing in the oldest old: objectively and subjectively measured evidence from a population-based survey in Germany," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 537-547, December.
    6. Izolda Pristojkovic Suko & Magdalena Holter & Erwin Stolz & Elfriede Renate Greimel & Wolfgang Freidl, 2022. "Acculturation, Adaptation, and Health among Croatian Migrants in Austria and Ireland: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Kristin Thomas & Evalill Nilsson & Karin Festin & Pontus Henriksson & Mats Lowén & Marie Löf & Margareta Kristenson, 2020. "Associations of Psychosocial Factors with Multiple Health Behaviors: A Population-Based Study of Middle-Aged Men and Women," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-17, February.
    8. Ana Raquel Nunes, 2021. "Exploring the interactions between vulnerability, resilience and adaptation to extreme temperatures," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 109(3), pages 2261-2293, December.
    9. Leiv Gabrielsen & Pål Ulleberg & Reidulf Watten, 2012. "The Adolescent Life Goal Profile Scale: Development of a New Scale for Measurements of Life Goals Among Young People," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 13(6), pages 1053-1072, December.
    10. Mia M. Vainio & Daiva Daukantaitė, 2016. "Grit and Different Aspects of Well-Being: Direct and Indirect Relationships via Sense of Coherence and Authenticity," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 17(5), pages 2119-2147, October.
    11. Orna Braun-Lewensohn, 2016. "Sense of Coherence, Values, Youth Involvement, Civic Efficacy and Hope: Adolescents During Social Protest," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 128(2), pages 661-673, September.
    12. Ma, Yuting & Chen, Xin & Nunez, Alejandra & Yan, Miao & Zhang, Baoshan & Zhao, Fengqing, 2020. "Influences of parenting on adolescents’ empathy through the intervening effects of self-integrity and sense of coherence," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    13. I. Khumalo & Q. Temane & M. Wissing, 2012. "Socio-Demographic Variables, General Psychological Well-Being and the Mental Health Continuum in an African Context," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 105(3), pages 419-442, February.
    14. Tone M Norekvål & Bengt Fridlund & Philip Moons & Jan E Nordrehaug & Hans I Sævareid & Tore Wentzel‐Larsen & Berit R Hanestad, 2010. "Sense of coherence—a determinant of quality of life over time in older female acute myocardial infarction survivors," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(5‐6), pages 820-831, March.
    15. Dorota Ortenburger & Dariusz Mosler & Józef Langfort & Jacek Wąsik, 2022. "Feeling of Meaningfulness and Anxiety of Taekwon-Do Fighters in a Salutogenic Notion," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-8, November.
    16. Cai‐Yun He & Ann Tak‐Ying Shiu, 2006. "Sense of coherence and diabetes‐specific stress perceptions of diabetic patients in central Mainland China," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(11), pages 1460-1462, November.
    17. Karen Birna Thorvaldsdottir & Sigridur Halldorsdottir & Denise M. Saint Arnault, 2021. "Understanding and Measuring Help-Seeking Barriers among Intimate Partner Violence Survivors: Mixed-Methods Validation Study of the Icelandic Barriers to Help-Seeking for Trauma (BHS-TR) Scale," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-21, December.
    18. Wei Chen & Ya Fang & Fanzhen Mao & Shichao Hao & Junze Chen & Manqiong Yuan & Yaofeng Han & Y Alicia Hong, 2015. "Assessment of Disability among the Elderly in Xiamen of China: A Representative Sample Survey of 14,292 Older Adults," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-12, June.
    19. Unni Moksnes & Gørill Haugan, 2014. "Validation of the Orientation to Life Questionnaire in Norwegian Adolescents, Construct Validity Across Samples," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 119(2), pages 1105-1120, November.
    20. Yuya Kashiwazaki & Hitomi Matsunaga & Makiko Orita & Yasuyuki Taira & Keiko Oishi & Noboru Takamura, 2022. "Occupational Difficulties of Disaster-Affected Local Government Employees in the Long-Term Recovery Phase after the Fukushima Nuclear Accident: A Cross-Sectional Study Using Modeling Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-10, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:12911-:d:936909. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.