IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i19p12297-d927348.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Microbial Fuel Cell-Based Biosensor for Simultaneous Test of Sodium Acetate and Glucose in a Mixed Solution

Author

Listed:
  • Song Qiu

    (College of Life Science and Technology, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China)

  • Luyang Wang

    (College of Chemistry, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China)

  • Yimei Zhang

    (MOE Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental System Optimization, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Yingjie Yu

    (State Key Laboratory of Organic-Inorganic Composites, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China)

Abstract

Most microbial fuel cell (MFC) sensors only focus on the detection of mixed solutions with respect to the chemical oxygen demand (COD) or toxicity; however, the concentrations of the individual analytes in a mixed solution have rarely been studied. Herein, we developed two types of MFC sensors, adapted with sodium acetate (MFC-A) and glucose (MFC-B) as organic substrates in the startup period. An evident difference in the sensor sensitivities (the slope value of the linear-regression curve) was observed between MFC-A and MFC-B. MFC-A exhibited a superior performance compared with MFC-B in the detection of sodium acetate (4868.9 vs. 2202 mV/(g/L), respectively) and glucose (3895.5 vs. 3192.9 mV/(g/L), respectively). To further compare these two MFC sensors, the electrochemical performances were evaluated, and MFC-A exhibited a higher output voltage and power density (593.76 mV and 129.81 ± 4.10 mW/m 2 , respectively) than MFC-B (484.08 mV and 116.21 ± 1.81 mW/m 2 , respectively). Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) and microbial-community analysis were also performed, and the results showed a richer anode biomass of MFC-A in comparison with MFC-B. By utilizing the different sensitivities of the two MFC sensors towards sodium acetate and glucose, we proposed and verified a novel method for a simultaneous test on the individual concentrations of sodium acetate and glucose in a mixed solution. Linear equations of the two variables (concentrations of sodium acetate and glucose) were formulated. The linear equations were solved according to the output voltages of the two MFC sensors, and the solutions showed a satisfactory accuracy with regard to sodium acetate and glucose (relative error less than 20%).

Suggested Citation

  • Song Qiu & Luyang Wang & Yimei Zhang & Yingjie Yu, 2022. "Microbial Fuel Cell-Based Biosensor for Simultaneous Test of Sodium Acetate and Glucose in a Mixed Solution," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-12, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:12297-:d:927348
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/12297/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/12297/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiang, Yong & Yang, Xufei & Liang, Peng & Liu, Panpan & Huang, Xia, 2018. "Microbial fuel cell sensors for water quality early warning systems: Fundamentals, signal resolution, optimization and future challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 292-305.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna Salvian & Daniel Farkas & Marina Ramírez-Moreno & Claudio Avignone Rossa & John R. Varcoe & Siddharth Gadkari, 2024. "Impact of Air-Cathodes on Operational Stability of Single-Chamber Microbial Fuel Cell Biosensors for Wastewater Monitoring," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-19, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Panpan & Liang, Peng & Jiang, Yong & Hao, Wen & Miao, Bo & Wang, Donglin & Huang, Xia, 2018. "Stimulated electron transfer inside electroactive biofilm by magnetite for increased performance microbial fuel cell," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 382-388.
    2. Abreham Tesfaye Besha & Misgina Tilahun Tsehaye & Girum Ayalneh Tiruye & Abaynesh Yihdego Gebreyohannes & Aymere Awoke & Ramato Ashu Tufa, 2020. "Deployable Membrane-Based Energy Technologies: the Ethiopian Prospect," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-33, October.
    3. Haishan Chen & Xiaoping Meng & Dianlei Liu & Wei Wang & Xiaodong Xing & Zhiyong Zhang & Chen Dong, 2022. "Closed-Loop Microbial Fuel Cell Control System Designed for Online Monitoring of TOC Dynamic Characteristics in Public Swimming Pool," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-12, October.
    4. Wu, Di & Li, Lei & Zhao, Xiaofei & Peng, Yun & Yang, Pingjin & Peng, Xuya, 2019. "Anaerobic digestion: A review on process monitoring," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 1-12.
    5. Ahmed, Shams Forruque & Mofijur, M. & Islam, Nafisa & Parisa, Tahlil Ahmed & Rafa, Nazifa & Bokhari, Awais & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír & Indra Mahlia, Teuku Meurah, 2022. "Insights into the development of microbial fuel cells for generating biohydrogen, bioelectricity, and treating wastewater," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).
    6. Zhang, Ying & Liu, Mengmeng & Zhou, Minghua & Yang, Huijia & Liang, Liang & Gu, Tingyue, 2019. "Microbial fuel cell hybrid systems for wastewater treatment and bioenergy production: Synergistic effects, mechanisms and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 13-29.
    7. Yang, Wei & Li, Jun & Fu, Qian & Zhang, Liang & Wei, Zidong & Liao, Qiang & Zhu, Xun, 2021. "Minimizing mass transfer losses in microbial fuel cells: Theories, progresses and prospectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:12297-:d:927348. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.