IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i19p12001-d922291.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Worker Protection Scenarios for General Analytical Testing Facility under Several Infection Propagation Risks: Scoping Review, Epidemiological Model and ISO 31000

Author

Listed:
  • Jong-Myong Park

    (Water Quality Research Institute, Waterworks Headquarters Incheon Metropolitan City, Incheon 21316, Korea
    Incheon Research Institute of Public Health and Environment, Incheon 22320, Korea)

  • Joong-Hee Cho

    (Water Quality Research Institute, Waterworks Headquarters Incheon Metropolitan City, Incheon 21316, Korea
    Incheon Research Institute of Public Health and Environment, Incheon 22320, Korea)

  • Nam-Soo Jun

    (Water Quality Research Institute, Waterworks Headquarters Incheon Metropolitan City, Incheon 21316, Korea)

  • Ki-In Bang

    (Water Quality Research Institute, Waterworks Headquarters Incheon Metropolitan City, Incheon 21316, Korea)

  • Ji-Won Hong

    (Department of Hydrogen and Renewable Energy, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea
    Advanced Bio-Resource Research Center, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea)

Abstract

Infectious disease is a risk threating industrial operations and worker health. In gastrointestinal disease cases, outbreak is sporadic, and propagation is often terminated within certain populations, although cases in industrial sites are continuously reported. The ISO 31000 international standard for risk management, an epidemiological triad model, and a scoping review were the methods used to establish response procedures (scenarios) to protect workers from the risk of the propagation of a gastrointestinal disease. First, human reservoirs and transmission routes were identified as controllable risk sources based on a scoping review and the use of a triad model. Second, the possibility of fomite- or surface-mediated transmission appeared to be higher based on environmental characterization. Thus, the propagation could be suppressed using epidemiological measures categorized by reservoirs (workers) or transmission routes during a primary case occurrence. Next, using results of a matrix, a strengths–weaknesses–opportunities–threats analysis and a scoping review, the risk treatment option was determined as risk taking and sharing. According to epidemiology of gastrointestinal infections, systematic scenarios may ensure the efficacy of propagation control. Standardized procedures with practicality and applicability were established for categorized scenarios. This study converged ISO 31000 standards, an epidemiological model, and scoping review methods to construct a risk management scenario (non-pharmaceutical intervention) optimized for the unique characteristics of a specific occupational cluster.

Suggested Citation

  • Jong-Myong Park & Joong-Hee Cho & Nam-Soo Jun & Ki-In Bang & Ji-Won Hong, 2022. "Worker Protection Scenarios for General Analytical Testing Facility under Several Infection Propagation Risks: Scoping Review, Epidemiological Model and ISO 31000," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-16, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:12001-:d:922291
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/12001/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/12001/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Solanka Ellen Ledwaba & Piet Becker & Afsatou Traore-Hoffman & Natasha Potgieter, 2019. "Bacterial Contamination of Children’s Toys in Rural Day Care Centres and Households in South Africa," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-12, August.
    2. Anna Carbone, 2017. "Food supply chains: coordination governance and other shaping forces," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 5(1), pages 1-23, December.
    3. Anabela Correia de Brito & Céline Kauffmann & Jacques Pelkmans, 2016. "The contribution of mutual recognition to international regulatory co-operation," OECD Regulatory Policy Working Papers 2, OECD Publishing.
    4. Natalie L Adams & Tanith C Rose & Jeremy Hawker & Mara Violato & Sarah J O’Brien & Benjamin Barr & Victoria J K Howard & Margaret Whitehead & Ross Harris & David C Taylor-Robinson, 2018. "Relationship between socioeconomic status and gastrointestinal infections in developed countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, January.
    5. Lu-jie Zhou & Qing-gui Cao & Kai Yu & Lin-lin Wang & Hai-bin Wang, 2018. "Research on Occupational Safety, Health Management and Risk Control Technology in Coal Mines," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-13, April.
    6. Maryam Ghazani & Gerard FitzGerald & Wenbiao Hu & Ghasem (Sam) Toloo & Zhiwei Xu, 2018. "Temperature Variability and Gastrointestinal Infections: A Review of Impacts and Future Perspectives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-12, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lina Schollin Ask & Can Liu & Karl Gauffin & Anders Hjern, 2019. "The Effect of Rotavirus Vaccine on Socioeconomic Differentials of Paediatric Care Due to Gastroenteritis in Swedish Infants," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-10, March.
    2. Shuai Han & Hong Chen & Ruyin Long, 2020. "Who Reports Low Interactive Psychology Status? An Investigation Based on Chinese Coal Miners," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-20, May.
    3. Adamashvili Nino & Fiore Mariantonietta & Contò Francesco & La Sala Piermichele, 2020. "Ecosystem for Successful Agriculture. Collaborative Approach as a Driver for Agricultural Development," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 12(2), pages 242-256, June.
    4. Rosalia Stella Evola & Giovanni Peira & Erica Varese & Alessandro Bonadonna & Enrica Vesce, 2022. "Short Food Supply Chains in Europe: Scientific Research Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-20, March.
    5. Lucia Baldi & Danilo Bertoni & Giuseppina Migliore & Massimo Peri, 2019. "How alternative food networks work in a metropolitan area? An analysis of Solidarity Purchase Groups in Northern Italy," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 7(1), pages 1-21, December.
    6. Benjamin Bürbaumer, 2021. "The Limits of Traditional Bargaining under Deep Integration: TTIP Stumbling over Technical Barriers to Trade," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(5), pages 1069-1085, September.
    7. Corrado Ievoli & Angelo Belliggiano & Danilo Marandola & Giuseppe Pistacchio & Luca Romagnoli, 2019. "Network Contracts in the Italian agri-food industry: Determinants and spatial patterns," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 21(2), pages 275-306.
    8. Christoph F. Wiedenroth & Verena Otter, 2022. "Can new healthy luxury food products accelerate short food supply chain formation via social media marketing in high-income countries?," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 10(1), pages 1-30, December.
    9. Bachev, Hrabrin & Mihailova, Mihaela & Terziev, Dimitar & Georgiev, Minko & Dimova, Nadejda & Marinov, Petar & Mikova, Rosiza & Blagoeva, Snejana, 2024. "Структура И Управление На Договорните Отношения В Селското Стопанство На България [Structure and governance of contractual relations in Bulgarian agriculture]," MPRA Paper 121372, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Anna Carbone, 2018. "Foods and Places: Comparing Different Supply Chains," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-12, January.
    11. McGarraghy, Seán & Olafsdottir, Gudrun & Kazakov, Rossen & Huber, Élise & Loveluck, William & Gudbrandsdottir, Ingunn Y. & Čechura, Lukáš & Esposito, Gianandrea & Samoggia, Antonella & Aubert, Pierre-, 2022. "Conceptual system dynamics and agent-based modelling simulation of interorganisational fairness in food value chains: Research agenda and case studies," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 12(2).
    12. Lluís Sanmiquel-Pera & Marc Bascompta & Hernán Francisco Anticoi, 2019. "Analysis of a Historical Accident in a Spanish Coal Mine," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-11, September.
    13. Piermichele La Sala & Raffaele Silvestri & Francesco Contò, 2017. "Differentiation strategies for the wine and nursery sector: empirical evidence from an Italy region," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 5(1), pages 1-17, December.
    14. Anita Prakash (ed.), 2019. "Asia-Europe Connectivity Vision 2025: Challenges and Opportunities," Books, Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA), number 978-602-8660-91-4, August.
    15. Rotheram, Suzanne & Cooper, Jessie & Barr, Ben & Whitehead, Margaret, 2021. "How are inequalities generated in the management and consequences of gastrointestinal infections in the UK? An ethnographic study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    16. Bachev, Hrabrin & Ivanov, Bozhidar, 2023. "What is agrarian governance and how to assess how good it is?," MPRA Paper 117536, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Piera Bello & Vincenzo Galasso, 2020. "Old before their time: the role of employers in retirement decisions," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 27(5), pages 1198-1223, October.
    18. Xingbang Qiang & Guoqing Li & Jie Hou & Xia Zhang & Yujia Liu, 2023. "Intelligent Safety Risk Analysis and Decision-Making System for Underground Metal Mines Based on Big Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-15, June.
    19. Bachev, Hrabrin, 2023. "Аграрното Управление - Опит За Разбиране И Икономическо Анализиране [Agrarian governance - attempt to understand and economic analysis]," MPRA Paper 118350, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Markus Keck, 2022. "Special Issue: Sustainable Agri-Food Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-5, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:12001-:d:922291. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.