IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i18p11808-d918700.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Proposed Questions to Assess the Extent of Knowledge in Understanding the Radiology Report Language

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Alarifi

    (Health Informatics & Administration Department, College of Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53211, USA
    Radiological Sciences Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia)

  • Abdulrahman M. Jabour

    (Health Informatics Department, Faculty of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan 45142, Saudi Arabia)

  • Min Wu

    (Health Informatics & Administration Department, College of Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53211, USA)

  • Abdullah Aldosary

    (Body Imaging Department, Medical Imaging Administration, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh 12231, Saudi Arabia)

  • Mansour Almanaa

    (Radiological Sciences Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia)

  • Jake Luo

    (Health Informatics & Administration Department, College of Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53211, USA)

Abstract

Radiotherapy and diagnostic imaging play a significant role in medical care. The amount of patient participation and communication can be increased by helping patients understand radiology reports. There is insufficient information on how to measure a patient’s knowledge of a written radiology report. The goal of this study is to design a tool that will measure patient literacy of radiology reports. A radiological literacy tool was created and evaluated as part of the project. There were two groups of patients: control and intervention. A sample radiological report was provided to each group for reading. After reading the report, the groups were quizzed to see how well they understood the report. The participants answered the questions and the correlation between the understanding of the radiology report and the radiology report literacy questions was calculated. The correlations between radiology report literacy questions and radiology report understanding for the intervention and control groups were 0.522, p < 0.001, and 0.536, p < 0.001, respectively. Our radiology literacy tool demonstrated a good ability to measure the awareness of radiology report understanding (area under the receiver operator curve in control group (95% CI: 0.77 (0.71–0.81)) and intervention group (95% CI: 0.79 (0.74–0.84))). We successfully designed a tool that can measure the radiology literacy of patients. This tool is one of the first to measure the level of patient knowledge in the field of radiology understanding.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad Alarifi & Abdulrahman M. Jabour & Min Wu & Abdullah Aldosary & Mansour Almanaa & Jake Luo, 2022. "Proposed Questions to Assess the Extent of Knowledge in Understanding the Radiology Report Language," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-14, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:18:p:11808-:d:918700
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/18/11808/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/18/11808/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giuseppe Iarossi, 2006. "The Power of Survey Design : A User's Guide for Managing Surveys, Interpreting Results, and Influencing Respondents," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 6975.
    2. Xia Li & Ning Ning & Yanhua Hao & Hong Sun & Lijun Gao & Mingli Jiao & Qunhong Wu & Hude Quan, 2013. "Health Literacy in Rural Areas of China: Hypertension Knowledge Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-14, March.
    3. Mohammad Alarifi & Timothy Patrick & Abdulrahman Jabour & Min Wu & Jake Luo, 2020. "Full Radiology Report through Patient Web Portal: A Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-20, May.
    4. Stewart, D.W. & Adams, C.E. & Cano, M.A. & Correa-Fernández, V. & Li, Y. & Waters, A.J. & Wetter, D.W. & Vidrine, J.I., 2013. "Associations between health literacy and established predictors of smoking cessation," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 103(7), pages 43-49.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ying Wu & Lu Wang & Zhongyuan Cai & Luqi Bao & Pu Ai & Zisheng Ai, 2017. "Prevalence and Risk Factors of Low Health Literacy: A Community-Based Study in Shanghai, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-10, June.
    2. Eun-Hye Lee & Sun-Hwa Shin & Goo-Churl Jeong, 2022. "Smoking Awareness and Intention to Quit Smoking in Smoking Female Workers: Secondary Data Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-13, March.
    3. World Bank, 2008. "Bulgaria - Investment Climate Assessment : Volume 2. Detailed Report," World Bank Publications - Reports 7868, The World Bank Group.
    4. Salisu Barau, Aliyu & Stringer, Lindsay C., 2015. "Access to and allocation of ecosystem services in Malaysia's Pulau Kukup Ramsar Site," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 16(C), pages 167-173.
    5. Zezza, Alberto & Federighi, Giovanni & Kalilou, Amadou Adamou & Hiernaux, Pierre, 2016. "Milking the data: Measuring milk off-take in extensive livestock systems. Experimental evidence from Niger," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 174-186.
    6. Junaidi Budi Prihanto & Faridha Nurhayati & Endang Sri Wahjuni & Ryota Matsuyama & Miwako Tsunematsu & Masayuki Kakehashi, 2021. "Health Literacy and Health Behavior: Associated Factors in Surabaya High School Students, Indonesia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-20, July.
    7. Boulaga,Amadou Adamou Kalilou & Federighi,Giovanni & Hiernaux, Pierre & Zezza,Alberto & Boulaga,Amadou Adamou Kalilou & Federighi,Giovanni & Hiernaux, Pierre & Zezza,Alberto, 2014. "Milking the data : measuring income from milk production in extensive livestock systems -- experimental evidence from Niger," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7114, The World Bank.
    8. Nguyen, Duyen Thuy & Donnelly, Michael & Van Hoang, Minh & O'Neill, Ciaran, 2023. "The case for individualised public health interventions: Smoking prevalence and inequalities in Northern Ireland 1985-2015," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    9. Pimbucha Rusmevichientong & Celina Morales & Gabriela Castorena & Ratana Sapbamrer & Mathuramat Seesen & Penprapa Siviroj, 2021. "Dietary Salt-Related Determinants of Hypertension in Rural Northern Thailand," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-16, January.
    10. Tianfeng He & Lefan Liu & Jing Huang & Guoxing Li & Xinbiao Guo, 2021. "Health Knowledge about Smoking, Role of Doctors, and Self-Perceived Health: A Cross-Sectional Study on Smokers’ Intentions to Quit," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-16, March.
    11. Wenjie Zhang & Hongdao Meng & Shujuan Yang & Honglin Luo & Danping Liu, 2018. "Changes in Hypertension-Related Knowledge and Behavior and Their Associations with Socioeconomic Status among Recently Urbanized Residents in China: 2013–2016," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-14, August.
    12. Andreas Älgå & Thi Anh Thu Dang & Dell D. Saulnier & Gia Thanh Nguyen & Johan Von Schreeb, 2018. "Hope for the Best, Prepare for the Worst—An Assessment of Flood Preparedness at Primary Health Care Facilities in Central Vietnam," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-8, November.
    13. Tigran A. Melkonyan & David A. Grigorian, 2011. "Microeconomic Implications of Remittances in an Overlapping Generations Model with Altruism and a Motive to Receive Inheritance," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(8), pages 1026-1044, March.
    14. Aneta Mikuła & Małgorzata Raczkowska & Monika Utzig, 2021. "Pro-Environmental Behaviour in the European Union Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-19, September.
    15. Urciuoli, Luca, 2016. "What are the causes of transport insecurity? Results from a survey with transport operators," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 189-202.
    16. Höpner, Martin & Jurczyk, Bojan, 2015. "How the eurobarometer blurs the Line between research and propaganda," MPIfG Discussion Paper 15/6, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    17. Canoquena, Joao & King, Mark, 2015. "Adaptive nature of coordinated road traffic injury prevention responses in some OECD countries," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 81-88.
    18. Fauchart, Emmanuelle & Bacache-Beauvallet, Maya & Bourreau, Marc & Moreau, François, 2022. "Do-It-Yourself or Do-It-Together: How digital technologies affect creating alone or with others?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    19. Carletto,Calogero & Dillon,Andrew S. & Zezza,Alberto, 2021. "Agricultural Data Collection to Minimize Measurement Error and Maximize Coverage," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9745, The World Bank.
    20. Zhu, Xiaoxuan & Xiao, Zhenxin & Dong, Maggie Chuoyan & Gu, Jibao, 2019. "The fit between firms’ open innovation and business model for new product development speed: A contingent perspective," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 86, pages 75-85.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:18:p:11808-:d:918700. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.