IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i18p11298-d909964.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urban Air Mobility Noise: Further Considerations on Indoor Space

Author

Listed:
  • JungHoon Kim

    (Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, Goyang 10223, Korea)

Abstract

Various countries are preparing for the introduction of urban air mobility (UAM) vehicles, which move freely within the space above a city, as a new means of urban transportation. However, UAM vehicles present new forms of challenges to many urban residents. This study aims to propose newly sensory standards for the noise levels of UAM vehicles in urban indoor spaces based on two fundamental questions: (1) Would UAM vehicles not have a lower and wider impact on city residents than a commercial aircraft? (2) Should the flight of UAM vehicles not consider the sensory noise, like the conventional noise standard? UAM vehicles, unlike commercial aircrafts, will cause noise pollution in a broad area of the city. Therefore, expanded aircraft noise standards will be required. In addition, the hybridized noise generated by conventional vehicles in the ground and UAM vehicles in the air will affect urban residents. Furthermore, urban residents will be exposed to sensory noise from UAM vehicles, which fly directly above them but not within their line of sight. Therefore, the noise standards for UAM vehicles should include the sensory properties in addition to the physical properties in the existing noise standards.

Suggested Citation

  • JungHoon Kim, 2022. "Urban Air Mobility Noise: Further Considerations on Indoor Space," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-11, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:18:p:11298-:d:909964
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/18/11298/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/18/11298/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Girvin, Raquel, 2009. "Aircraft noise-abatement and mitigation strategies," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 14-22.
    2. Guolei Zhou & Jing Zhang & Chenggu Li & Yanjun Liu, 2022. "Spatial Pattern of Functional Urban Land Conversion and Expansion under Rapid Urbanization: A Case Study of Changchun, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Fang-Yuan, 2013. "The intention and determining factors for airline passengers' participation in carbon offset schemes," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 17-22.
    2. Boshen Jiao & Zafar Zafari & Brian Will & Kai Ruggeri & Shukai Li & Peter Muennig, 2017. "The Cost-Effectiveness of Lowering Permissible Noise Levels Around U.S. Airports," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-10, December.
    3. Phun, Veng Kheang & Hirata, Terumitsu & Yai, Tetsuo, 2016. "Effects of noise information provision on aircraft noise tolerability: Results from an experimental study," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1-10.
    4. Asad Aziz & Muhammad Mushahid Anwar & Hazem Ghassan Abdo & Hussein Almohamad & Ahmed Abdullah Al Dughairi & Motrih Al-Mutiry, 2023. "Proximity to Neighborhood Services and Property Values in Urban Area: An Evaluation through the Hedonic Pricing Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-12, April.
    5. Rosskopf, Michael & Lehner, Stephan & Gollnick, Volker, 2014. "Economic–environmental trade-offs in long-term airline fleet planning," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 109-115.
    6. Picard, Pierre M. & Selod, Harris, 2023. "Customary Land Conversion in African Cities," IZA Discussion Papers 16462, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    7. Jinlong Xie & Lei Zhu & Hsiao Mun Lee, 2023. "Aircraft Noise Reduction Strategies and Analysis of the Effects," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-19, January.
    8. Adler, Nicole & Gellman, Aaron, 2012. "Strategies for managing risk in a changing aviation environment," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 24-35.
    9. Postorino, Maria Nadia & Mantecchini, Luca, 2016. "A systematic approach to assess the effectiveness of airport noise mitigation strategies," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 71-82.
    10. Wei Pan & Jing Wang & Zhi Lu & Yurui Li, 2023. "Swelling Cities? Detecting China’s Urban Land Transition Based on Time Series Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, January.
    11. Kiani Sadr, Maryam & Nassiri, Parvin & Hosseini, Mohsen & Monavari, Masoud & Gharagozlou, Alireza, 2014. "Assessment of land use compatibility and noise pollution at Imam Khomeini International Airport," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 49-56.
    12. Yibo Yang & Guangdao Bao & Dan Zhang & Chang Zhai, 2022. "Spatial Distribution and Driving Factors of Old and Notable Trees in a Fast-Developing City, Northeast China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-19, June.
    13. Nermin Zijadić & Emir Ganić & Matija Bračić & Igor Štimac, 2022. "Impact of Aircraft Delays on Population Noise Exposure in Airport’s Surroundings," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-20, July.
    14. Evangelinos, Christos & Püschel, Ronny & Niemeier, Hans-Martin, 2020. "Special interest groups and price-structure: An application to noise charging at Zurich Airport," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    15. Xinpeng Li & Wei Hou & Meng Liu & Zhenlin Yu, 2022. "Traditional Thoughts and Modern Development of the Historical Urban Landscape in China: Lessons Learned from the Example of Pingyao Historical City," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, February.
    16. Chao, Ching-Cheng & Lirn, Taih-Cherng & Lin, Hung-Chun, 2017. "Indicators and evaluation model for analyzing environmental protection performance of airports," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 61-70.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:18:p:11298-:d:909964. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.