IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i18p11275-d909580.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigation of the Thermal Comfort Properties of Masks Used during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Eren Oner

    (Textile Engineering Department, Usak University, Usak 64200, Turkey)

  • Ahmet Çağdaş Seçkin

    (Computer Engineering Department, Adnan Menderes University, Aydin 09010, Turkey)

  • Dilara Egeli

    (Textile Engineering Department, Usak University, Usak 64200, Turkey)

  • Mine Seçkin

    (Textile Engineering Department, Usak University, Usak 64200, Turkey)

Abstract

SARS-CoV-2, the causative agent of COVID-19, which was officially declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO) on 11 March 2020, is transmitted from person to person through respiratory droplets and close contact and can cause severe respiratory failure and pneumonia. Currently, while the worldwide COVID-19 pandemic is still ongoing and countries are taking strict precautions to protect populations against infection, the most effective precautions still seem to be social distancing and wearing a mask. The question of how effective masks were in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic has been widely discussed, both in public and scientific circles, and the protection of different mask types has been examined. This study aimed to examine the comfort conditions provided by the different mask types to the user during use. For this purpose, single-ply, double-ply, three-ply, cloth, FFP1, FFP2, and FFP3 masks with different standards were examined, with and without a valve. To conduct the experiments, the novel thermal head measurement system, developed within the scope of this study, was used specifically for mask comfort studies. Thanks to the developed measurement system, the thermal resistance and water vapor resistance values of different masks were measured, and their comfort conditions were evaluated. According to the findings, cloth masks provide a comfortable condition, with lower thermal resistance and water vapor resistance values than other masks. In addition, it was observed that surgical masks offer better thermal comfort conditions, although they have lower protection than FFP masks.

Suggested Citation

  • Eren Oner & Ahmet Çağdaş Seçkin & Dilara Egeli & Mine Seçkin, 2022. "Investigation of the Thermal Comfort Properties of Masks Used during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-14, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:18:p:11275-:d:909580
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/18/11275/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/18/11275/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ewa Zender-Świercz & Marek Telejko & Beata Galiszewska, 2021. "Influence of Masks Protecting against SARS-CoV-2 on Thermal Comfort," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-11, June.
    2. Colin J. Worby & Hsiao-Han Chang, 2020. "Face mask use in the general population and optimal resource allocation during the COVID-19 pandemic," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-9, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nattavudh Powdthavee & Yohanes E Riyanto & Erwin C L Wong & Jonathan X W Yeo & Qi Yu Chan, 2021. "When face masks signal social identity: Explaining the deep face-mask divide during the COVID-19 pandemic," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-15, June.
    2. Nikhil Agarwal & Andrew Komo & Chetan A. Patel & Parag A. Pathak & M. Utku Ünver, 2021. "The Trade-off Between Prioritization and Vaccination Speed Depends on Mitigation Measures," NBER Working Papers 28519, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Hubert, Philipp & Abdel Hadi, Sascha & Mojzisch, Andreas & Häusser, Jan Alexander, 2022. "The effects of organizational climate on adherence to guidelines for COVID-19 prevention," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    4. Bedilu Alamirie Ejigu & Manalebish Debalike Asfaw & Lisa Cavalerie & Tilahun Abebaw & Mark Nanyingi & Matthew Baylis, 2021. "Assessing the impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPI) on the dynamics of COVID-19: A mathematical modelling study of the case of Ethiopia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-21, November.
    5. Aspri, Andrea & Beretta, Elena & Gandolfi, Alberto & Wasmer, Etienne, 2021. "Mortality containment vs. Economics Opening: Optimal policies in a SEIARD model," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    6. Xu, Yuan-Hao & Wang, Hao-Jie & Lu, Zhong-Wen & Hu, Mao-Bin, 2023. "Impact of awareness dissemination on epidemic reaction–diffusion in multiplex networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 621(C).
    7. Bo Zhang & Zhongjie Li & Lei Jiang, 2021. "The Intentions to Wear Face Masks and the Differences in Preventive Behaviors between Urban and Rural Areas during COVID-19: An Analysis Based on the Technology Acceptance Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-15, September.
    8. Kate M. Bubar & Casey E. Middleton & Kristen K. Bjorkman & Roy Parker & Daniel B. Larremore, 2022. "SARS-CoV-2 transmission and impacts of unvaccinated-only screening in populations of mixed vaccination status," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    9. Braden Leap & Kimberly Kelly & Marybeth C. Stalp, 2022. "Choreographing social reproduction: Making personal protective equipment and gender during a neoliberal pandemic," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 758-777, May.
    10. Jos Lelieveld & Frank Helleis & Stephan Borrmann & Yafang Cheng & Frank Drewnick & Gerald Haug & Thomas Klimach & Jean Sciare & Hang Su & Ulrich Pöschl, 2020. "Model Calculations of Aerosol Transmission and Infection Risk of COVID-19 in Indoor Environments," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-18, November.
    11. Baloch, Gohram & Gzara, Fatma & Elhedhli, Samir, 2023. "Risk-based allocation of COVID-19 personal protective equipment under supply shortages," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(3), pages 1085-1100.
    12. Deng, Yang & He, Daihai & Zhao, Yi, 2024. "The impacts of anti-protective awareness and protective awareness programs on COVID-19 outbreaks," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    13. Boraey, Mohammed A., 2021. "An analytical model for the effective filtration efficiency of single and multiple face masks considering leakage," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    14. Kieran Collings & Cedric Boisdon & Tung-Ting Sham & Kevin Skinley & Hyun-Kyung Oh & Tessa Prince & Adham Ahmed & Shaun H. Pennington & Philip J. Brownridge & Thomas Edwards & Giancarlo A. Biagini & Cl, 2023. "Attaching protein-adsorbing silica particles to the surface of cotton substrates for bioaerosol capture including SARS-CoV-2," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    15. Wei-Cheng Chen & Lin Chen & Yi-Cheng Kao, 2024. "Efficient mask allocation during a pandemic," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 28(2), pages 275-311, June.
    16. Shuvrangshu Jana & Rudrashis Majumder & Prathyush P. Menon & Debasish Ghose, 2022. "Decision Support System (DSS) for Hierarchical Allocation of Resources and Tasks for Disaster Management," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 3(3), pages 1-30, September.
    17. Yuan Liu & Chuyao Liao & Li Zhuo & Haiyan Tao, 2022. "Evaluating Effects of Dynamic Interventions to Control COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study of Guangdong, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-17, August.
    18. Anna Petherick & Rafael Goldszmidt & Eduardo B. Andrade & Rodrigo Furst & Thomas Hale & Annalena Pott & Andrew Wood, 2021. "A worldwide assessment of changes in adherence to COVID-19 protective behaviours and hypothesized pandemic fatigue," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 5(9), pages 1145-1160, September.
    19. Tao Liu & Xiaofang Shan & Qinli Deng & Zeng Zhou & Guang Yang & Jue Wang & Zhigang Ren, 2022. "Thermal Perception and Physiological Responses under Different Protection States in Indoor Crowded Spaces during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Summer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-15, May.
    20. Hermógenes Fernández-Marín & Gaspar Bruner-Montero & Ana Portugal-Loayza & Virginia Miranda & Alcibiades Elias Villarreal Dominguez & Eduardo Ortega-Barría & Virginia Núñez-Samudio & Iván Landires & L, 2021. "Dynamics of Mask Use as a Prevention Strategy against SARS-CoV-2 in Panama," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-11, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:18:p:11275-:d:909580. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.