IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i16p10154-d889679.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating Effects of Dynamic Interventions to Control COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study of Guangdong, China

Author

Listed:
  • Yuan Liu

    (Guangdong Provincial Engineering Research Center for Public Security and Disaster, School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Chuyao Liao

    (Guangdong Provincial Engineering Research Center for Public Security and Disaster, School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Li Zhuo

    (Guangdong Provincial Engineering Research Center for Public Security and Disaster, School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China
    Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai 519000, China)

  • Haiyan Tao

    (Guangdong Provincial Engineering Research Center for Public Security and Disaster, School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China
    Key Laboratory of Tropical Disease Control, Ministry of Education, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China)

Abstract

The emergence of different virus variants, the rapidly changing epidemic, and demands for economic recovery all require continual adjustment and optimization of COVID-19 intervention policies. For the purpose, it is both important and necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of different policies already in-place, which is the basis for optimization. Although some scholars have used epidemiological models, such as susceptible-exposed-infected-removed (SEIR), to perform evaluation, they might be inaccurate because those models often ignore the time-varying nature of transmission rate. This study proposes a new scheme to evaluate the efficiency of dynamic COVID-19 interventions using a new model named as iLSEIR-DRAM. First, we improved the traditional LSEIR model by adopting a five-parameter logistic function β ( t ) to depict the key parameter of transmission rate. Then, we estimated the parameters by using an adaptive Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm, which combines delayed rejection and adaptive metropolis samplers (DRAM). Finally, we developed a new quantitative indicator to evaluate the efficiency of COVID-19 interventions, which is based on parameters in β ( t ) and considers both the decreasing degree of the transmission rate and the emerging time of the epidemic inflection point. This scheme was applied to seven cities in Guangdong Province. We found that the iLSEIR-DRAM model can retrace the COVID-19 transmission quite well, with the simulation accuracy being over 95% in all cities. The proposed indicator succeeds in evaluating the historical intervention efficiency and makes the efficiency comparable among different cities. The comparison results showed that the intervention policies implemented in Guangzhou is the most efficient, which is consistent with public awareness. The proposed scheme for efficiency evaluation in this study is easy to implement and may promote precise prevention and control of the COVID-19 epidemic.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuan Liu & Chuyao Liao & Li Zhuo & Haiyan Tao, 2022. "Evaluating Effects of Dynamic Interventions to Control COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study of Guangdong, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-17, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:16:p:10154-:d:889679
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/16/10154/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/16/10154/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huang, Yunhan & Ding, Li & Feng, Yun, 2016. "A novel epidemic spreading model with decreasing infection rate based on infection times," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 444(C), pages 1041-1048.
    2. Thomas Hale & Noam Angrist & Rafael Goldszmidt & Beatriz Kira & Anna Petherick & Toby Phillips & Samuel Webster & Emily Cameron-Blake & Laura Hallas & Saptarshi Majumdar & Helen Tatlow, 2021. "A global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker)," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 5(4), pages 529-538, April.
    3. Amber I. Raja & Karin van Veldhoven & Adanna Ewuzie & Gillian Frost & Vince Sandys & Barry Atkinson & Ian Nicholls & Alice Graham & Hannah Higgins & Matthew Coldwell & Andrew Simpson & Joan Cooke & Al, 2022. "Investigation of a SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak at an Automotive Manufacturing Site in England," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-14, May.
    4. Baak, M. & Koopman, R. & Snoek, H. & Klous, S., 2020. "A new correlation coefficient between categorical, ordinal and interval variables with Pearson characteristics," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    5. Georgia Treneman-Evans & Becky Ali & James Denison-Day & Tara Clegg & Lucy Yardley & Sarah Denford & Rosie Essery, 2022. "The Rapid Adaptation and Optimisation of a Digital Behaviour-Change Intervention to Reduce the Spread of COVID-19 in Schools," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-22, May.
    6. Zhuolin Tao & Qi Wang, 2022. "Facility or Transport Inequality? Decomposing Healthcare Accessibility Inequality in Shenzhen, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-14, June.
    7. Das, Arghya & Dhar, Abhishek & Goyal, Srashti & Kundu, Anupam & Pandey, Saurav, 2021. "COVID-19: Analytic results for a modified SEIR model and comparison of different intervention strategies," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    8. Colin J. Worby & Hsiao-Han Chang, 2020. "Face mask use in the general population and optimal resource allocation during the COVID-19 pandemic," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-9, December.
    9. Gaeta, Giuseppe, 2020. "Social distancing versus early detection and contacts tracing in epidemic management," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    10. Pan, Qiuhui & Gao, Ting & He, Mingfeng, 2020. "Influence of isolation measures for patients with mild symptoms on the spread of COVID-19," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    11. Shou, Ming-Huan & Wang, Zheng-Xin & Lou, Wen-Qian, 2021. "Effect evaluation of non-pharmaceutical interventions taken in China to contain the COVID-19 epidemic based on the susceptible-exposed-infected-recovered model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hannah Carver & Tracey Price & Danilo Falzon & Peter McCulloch & Tessa Parkes, 2022. "Stress and Wellbeing during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Methods Exploration of Frontline Homelessness Services Staff Experiences in Scotland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-20, March.
    2. Nattavudh Powdthavee & Yohanes E Riyanto & Erwin C L Wong & Jonathan X W Yeo & Qi Yu Chan, 2021. "When face masks signal social identity: Explaining the deep face-mask divide during the COVID-19 pandemic," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-15, June.
    3. Xiao Chen & Hanwei Huang & Jiandong Ju & Ruoyan Sun & Jialiang Zhang, 2022. "Endogenous cross-region human mobility and pandemics," CEP Discussion Papers dp1860, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    4. Yekaterina Chzhen & Jennifer Symonds & Dympna Devine & Júlia Mikolai & Susan Harkness & Seaneen Sloan & Gabriela Martinez Sainz, 2022. "Learning in a Pandemic: Primary School children’s Emotional Engagement with Remote Schooling during the spring 2020 Covid-19 Lockdown in Ireland," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 15(4), pages 1517-1538, August.
    5. Mirko Licchetta & Giovanni Mattozzi & Rafal Raciborski & Rupert Willis, 2022. "Economic Adjustment in the Euro Area and the United States during the COVID-19 Crisis," European Economy - Discussion Papers 160, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.
    6. Lucia Freira & Marco Sartorio & Cynthia Boruchowicz & Florencia Lopez Boo & Joaquin Navajas, 2021. "The interplay between partisanship, forecasted COVID-19 deaths, and support for preventive policies," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-10, December.
    7. Galil, Koresh & Varon, Eva, 2024. "National culture and banks stock volatility," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    8. Cosimo Russo & Alberto Castro & Andrea Gioia & Vito Iacobellis & Angela Gorgoglione, 2023. "A Stormwater Management Framework for Predicting First Flush Intensity and Quantifying its Influential Factors," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 37(3), pages 1437-1459, February.
    9. Hammond, James & Siegal, Kim & Milner, Daniel & Elimu, Emmanuel & Vail, Taylor & Cathala, Paul & Gatera, Arsene & Karim, Azfar & Lee, Ja-Eun & Douxchamps, Sabine & Tu, Mai Thanh & Ouma, Emily & Lukuyu, 2022. "Perceived effects of COVID-19 restrictions on smallholder farmers: Evidence from seven lower- and middle-income countries," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    10. Beckles, Jamila & Jackman, Mahalia, 2024. "Financial worry and government responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in 88 Countries: Did public confidence in National Governments matter?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    11. Yunhan Huang & Quanyan Zhu, 2022. "Game-Theoretic Frameworks for Epidemic Spreading and Human Decision-Making: A Review," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 7-48, March.
    12. Winfree, Paul, 2023. "The long-run effects of temporarily closing schools: Evidence from Virginia, 1870s-1910s," QUCEH Working Paper Series 23-02, Queen's University Belfast, Queen's University Centre for Economic History.
    13. Xu,Yuanwei & Delius,Antonia Johanna Sophie & Pape,Utz Johann, 2022. "Gender Differences in Household Coping Strategies for COVID-19 in Kenya," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9959, The World Bank.
    14. Christoph Lindner & Ibolya Kotta & Eszter Eniko Marschalko & Kinga Szabo & Kinga Kalcza-Janosi & Jan Retelsdorf, 2022. "Increased Risk Perception, Distress Intolerance and Health Anxiety in Stricter Lockdowns: Self-Control as a Key Protective Factor in Early Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-22, April.
    15. Elmarie Nel & Andrew MacLachlan & Ollie Ballinger & Hugh Cole & Megan Cole, 2023. "Data-Driven Decision Making in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic: A City of Cape Town Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, January.
    16. Juan Grigera, 2022. "Adding Insult to Injury: The COVID‐19 Crisis Strikes Latin America," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 53(6), pages 1335-1361, November.
    17. Valentina Aprigliano & Alessandro Borin & Francesco Paolo Conteduca & Simone Emiliozzi & Marco Flaccadoro & Sabina Marchetti & Stefania Villa, 2021. "Forecasting Italian GDP growth with epidemiological data," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 664, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    18. Maximilien Chaumon & Pier-Alexandre Rioux & Sophie K. Herbst & Ignacio Spiousas & Sebastian L. Kübel & Elisa M. Gallego Hiroyasu & Şerife Leman Runyun & Luigi Micillo & Vassilis Thanopoulos & Esteban , 2022. "The Blursday database as a resource to study subjective temporalities during COVID-19," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 6(11), pages 1587-1599, November.
    19. Daryna Grechyna, 2024. "Elections and policies: Evidence from the Covid pandemic," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 77(3), pages 812-831, August.
    20. Kaba, Mustafa & Koyuncu, Murat & Schneider, Sebastian O. & Sutter, Matthias, 2024. "Social norms, political polarization, and vaccination attitudes: Evidence from a survey experiment in Turkey," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:16:p:10154-:d:889679. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.