IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i17p10700-d899600.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of the “Warning Signs Campaign” on Characteristics of Patients Presenting with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) to Hospitals

Author

Listed:
  • Eleanor Redwood

    (Department of Cardiology, Northern Beaches Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2086, Australia)

  • Karice Hyun

    (School of Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
    ANZAC Research Institute, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2137, Australia)

  • John French

    (Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia)

  • Derek Chew

    (Department of Cardiology, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA 5042, Australia)

  • Leonard Kritharides

    (Atherosclerosis Laboratory, ANZAC Research Institute, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia)

  • David Brieger

    (Department of Cardiology, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Hospital Road, Concord, Sydney, NSW 2139, Australia)

Abstract

Objective: The National Heart Foundation’s Warning Signs Campaign (2009–2013) aimed to raise awareness amongst the public of Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS), encouraging people to recognise suggestive symptoms and seek immediate medical attention. This study explores the impact of the campaign on the characteristics of patients presenting to hospitals around Australia with ACS. Design: Retrospective cohort analysis Setting: 10 Australian Hospitals recruiting for the CONCORDANCE registry continuously throughout the campaign period. Participants: Patients presenting with ACS to hospitals before, during and after the campaign ran in their jurisdiction. Main Outcome Measures: Whether an ambulance was called, time between onset of symptoms to first medical contact, as well as time between onset of symptoms to primary percutaneous intervention or lysis. Results: Time to first medical contact did not improve during or post-campaign for NSTEACS medical hours (IQI) 1.6 (0.5–4.8) pre, 2.2 (0.7–7.6) during, 2 (0.7–6.9) post ( p < 0.001) or STEMI, 1.1 (0.4–3.5) pre, 1.6 (0.6–5.1) during, 1.4 (0.5–4.3) post ( p = 0.0113). In STEMI, time from symptom onset to pPCI ( p = 0.256) and time to lysis ( p = 0.387) were also unchanged. The proportion of ambulance arrivals remained stable (pre 55% vs. during 58%, p = 0.493). Patients presenting during the campaign were more likely to be born in Australia 56% pre, 69% during, 68% post ( p < 0.001), to report English as a first language 67% pre, 84% during, 79% post ( p < 0.001), and had lower likelihood of prior MI or revascularization but greater likelihood of cardiovascular risk factors compared to those presenting prior. Conclusion: Among patients with ACS, we detected no increase in proportion of ambulance presentations nor earlier presentations among NSTEACS or STEMI during the campaign. There was an increase in the proportion of patients for whom English was the first language and those without a prior cardiac history but with cardiovascular risk factors, suggesting that the campaign impacted preferentially on certain strata in the community.

Suggested Citation

  • Eleanor Redwood & Karice Hyun & John French & Derek Chew & Leonard Kritharides & David Brieger, 2022. "Impact of the “Warning Signs Campaign” on Characteristics of Patients Presenting with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) to Hospitals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-7, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:17:p:10700-:d:899600
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/17/10700/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/17/10700/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mariusz Duplaga, 2019. "Perception of the Effectiveness of Health-Related Campaigns among the Adult Population: An Analysis of Determinants," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Bernadette Hyland-Wood & John Gardner & Julie Leask & Ullrich K. H. Ecker, 2021. "Toward effective government communication strategies in the era of COVID-19," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Niederdeppe, J. & Fiore, M.C. & Baker, T.B. & Smith, S.S., 2008. "Smoking-cessation media campaigns and their effectiveness among socioeconomically advantaged and disadvantaged populations," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 98(5), pages 916-924.
    4. Niederdeppe, Jeff & Kuang, Xiaodong & Crock, Brittney & Skelton, Ashley, 2008. "Media campaigns to promote smoking cessation among socioeconomically disadvantaged populations: What do we know, what do we need to learn, and what should we do now?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(9), pages 1343-1355, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sarah Kelly & Steven Martin & Isla Kuhn & Andy Cowan & Carol Brayne & Louise Lafortune, 2016. "Barriers and Facilitators to the Uptake and Maintenance of Healthy Behaviours by People at Mid-Life: A Rapid Systematic Review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(1), pages 1-26, January.
    2. Loiacono, Luisa & Puglisi, Riccardo & Rizzo, Leonzio & Secomandi, Riccardo, 2022. "Pandemic knowledge and regulation effectiveness: Evidence from COVID-19," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 768-783.
    3. Jennifer Cantrell & Donna M Vallone & James F Thrasher & Rebekah H Nagler & Shari P Feirman & Larry R Muenz & David Y He & Kasisomayajula Viswanath, 2013. "Impact of Tobacco-Related Health Warning Labels across Socioeconomic, Race and Ethnic Groups: Results from a Randomized Web-Based Experiment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, January.
    4. Neneh Rowa-Dewar & Amanda Amos, 2016. "Disadvantaged Parents’ Engagement with a National Secondhand Smoke in the Home Mass Media Campaign: A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-11, September.
    5. Douglas Guilbeault & Damon Centola, 2020. "Networked collective intelligence improves dissemination of scientific information regarding smoking risks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(2), pages 1-14, February.
    6. Suzanne Phibbs & Christine Kenney & Christina Severinsen & Jon Mitchell & Roger Hughes, 2016. "Synergising Public Health Concepts with the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction: A Conceptual Glossary," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-21, December.
    7. Tassisius Muzivi, 2022. "An Effective and Prompt Assessment of Good Corporate Governance on Public Sector Entities- Evaluation of Ideal Best Practices," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 6(1), pages 690-698, January.
    8. Shin-Ae Hong, 2023. "COVID-19 vaccine communication and advocacy strategy: a social marketing campaign for increasing COVID-19 vaccine uptake in South Korea," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-9, December.
    9. Christopoulou, Rebekka & Lillard, Dean R., 2015. "Is smoking behavior culturally determined? Evidence from British immigrants," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 78-90.
    10. Meder, Björn & Fleischhut, Nadine & Osman, Magda, 2018. "Beyond the confines of choice architecture: A critical analysis," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 36-44.
    11. Wheatley Dawn, 2022. "Irish audiences and news information from official sources during Covid-19," Administration, Sciendo, vol. 70(3), pages 7-32, August.
    12. Ding, Hongxiang & Zhang, Junyi, 2021. "Dynamic associations between temporal behavior changes caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and subjective assessments of policymaking: A case study in Japan," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 58-70.
    13. Daniela Azevedo & Ana Isabel Plácido & Maria Teresa Herdeiro & Fátima Roque & Vítor Roque, 2022. "How Portuguese Health Entities Used Social Media to Face the Public Health Emergency during COVID-19 Disease," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-13, September.
    14. Alicia M. Paul & Clarice Lee & Berhaun Fesshaye & Rachel Gur-Arie & Eleonor Zavala & Prachi Singh & Ruth A. Karron & Rupali J. Limaye, 2022. "Conceptualizing the COVID-19 Pandemic: Perspectives of Pregnant and Lactating Women, Male Community Members, and Health Workers in Kenya," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-14, August.
    15. Shalini Upadhyay & Nitin Upadhyay, 2023. "Mapping crisis communication in the communication research: what we know and what we don’t know," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-19, December.
    16. Uma Shankar Yadav & Ravindra Tripathi & Mano Ashish Tripathi & Ashish Kumar & Mitu Mandal, 2023. "Evaluation of factors affecting entrepreneurship: a case of Indian women in the handicraft industry," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-17, December.
    17. Peer Henri Kieweg & Stefanie Schöberl & Gabriele Palozzi, 2021. "The Role of Communication In COVID-19 Crisis Management: Findings about Information Behavior of German and Italian Young People," International Journal of Business Research and Management (IJBRM), Computer Science Journals (CSC Journals), vol. 12(5), pages 263-288, October.
    18. Jida Liu & Zheng Fu & Yuwei Song & Ruining Ma & Zebin Zhao, 2024. "How to improve the effectiveness of the cooperation networks of emergency science communication for public health emergencies," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    19. Biplab Kumar Datta & Muhammad Jami Husain & Ishtiaque Fazlul, 2020. "Tobacco control and household tobacco consumption: A tale of two educational groups," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(10), pages 1117-1131, October.
    20. Boqiang Lin & Huanyu Jia, 2023. "The role of peers in promoting energy conservation among Chinese university students," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:17:p:10700-:d:899600. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.