IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i16p10099-d889013.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Supporting and Enabling the Process of Innovation in Public Health: The Framework for Public Health Innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Whitney R. Garney

    (Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA)

  • Kelly L. Wilson

    (Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA)

  • Kristen M. Garcia

    (Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA)

  • Daenuka Muraleetharan

    (Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA)

  • Christi H. Esquivel

    (Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA)

  • Mandy N. Spadine

    (Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA)

  • Sonya Panjwani

    (Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA)

  • Kobi V. Ajayi

    (Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA)

Abstract

This manuscript introduces a new framework for creating innovations in public health—the Framework for Public Health Innovation. The framework was developed through a longitudinal qualitative research study that investigated the process of creating innovative adolescent health programs. Interviews were conducted with a national sample of 26 organizations over two time points. Data collection focused on the process of innovative program development; organizational capacity; training; and technical assistance needs, successes, and barriers. The framework was developed and modified based on interview findings and expert advice; then, the final framework was validated with content experts. The framework illustrates a dynamic process of innovation that begins with dissatisfaction with the status quo, and then, illustrates three necessary components for innovation—space, process, and partnerships. Four categories of innovation, which range in complexity, are proposed: (1) creating a new component to an existing program, (2) adapting an existing program to meet new needs, (3) taking an alternative approach to addressing an existing program, and (4) reframing a health problem from a new perspective. As illustrated by a feedback loop, the resulting innovations disrupt the status quo. This model can be applied to any content area in public health and is useful for both research and practitioners.

Suggested Citation

  • Whitney R. Garney & Kelly L. Wilson & Kristen M. Garcia & Daenuka Muraleetharan & Christi H. Esquivel & Mandy N. Spadine & Sonya Panjwani & Kobi V. Ajayi, 2022. "Supporting and Enabling the Process of Innovation in Public Health: The Framework for Public Health Innovation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-11, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:16:p:10099-:d:889013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/16/10099/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/16/10099/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin Falk, 2006. "What drives business Research and Development (R&D) intensity across Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(5), pages 533-547.
    2. Senge, Peter M. & Sterman, John D., 1992. "Systems thinking and organizational learning: Acting locally and thinking globally in the organization of the future," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(1), pages 137-150, May.
    3. Garney, Whitney R. & Wilson, Kelly & Nelon, Jordan L. & Hays, Christi & Garcia, Kristen M. & Muraleetharan, Daenuka & Farmer, Jennifer & McLeroy, Kenneth, 2019. "Understanding innovation in health program planning and development," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 226-231.
    4. Carlo Giacomo Leo & Maria Rosaria Tumolo & Saverio Sabina & Riccardo Colella & Virginia Recchia & Giuseppe Ponzini & Dimitrios Ioannis Fotiadis & Antonella Bodini & Pierpaolo Mincarone, 2022. "Health Technology Assessment for In Silico Medicine: Social, Ethical and Legal Aspects," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-13, January.
    5. Trochim, W.M. & Cabrera, D.A. & Milstein, B. & Gallagher, R.S. & Leischow, S.J., 2006. "Practical challenges of systems thinking and modeling in public health," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 96(3), pages 538-546.
    6. McLeroy, K., 2006. "Thinking of systems," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 96(3), pages 402-402.
    7. Nancy Roberts, 1978. "Teaching Dynamic Feedback Systems Thinking: An Elementary View," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(8), pages 836-843, April.
    8. Selwyn W. Becker & Thomas L. Whisler, 1967. "The Innovative Organization: A Selective View of Current Theory and Research," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 40, pages 462-462.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. T. Gries & R. Grundmann & I. Palnau & M. Redlin, 2017. "Innovations, growth and participation in advanced economies - a review of major concepts and findings," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 293-351, April.
    2. Gayoung Kim & Woo Jin Lee, 2021. "The Venture Firm’s Ambidexterity: Do Transformational Leaders Boost Organizational Learning for Venture Growth?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-15, July.
    3. Rahi Jain & Prashant Narnaware, 2020. "Application of Systems Thinking to Dent Child Malnutrition: A Palghar District, India Case Study," Millennial Asia, , vol. 11(1), pages 79-98, April.
    4. Goldman, Alyssa W. & Kane, Mary, 2014. "Concept mapping and network analysis: An analytic approach to measure ties among constructs," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 9-17.
    5. Soraya Tanure & Carlos Nabinger & João Luiz Becker, 2015. "Bioeconomic Model of Decision Support System for Farm Management: Proposal of a Mathematical Model," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(6), pages 658-671, November.
    6. Huang, Bwo-Nung & Hwang, M.J. & Yang, C.W., 2008. "Causal relationship between energy consumption and GDP growth revisited: A dynamic panel data approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 41-54, August.
    7. Kelley E. Dugan & Erika A. Mosyjowski & Shanna R. Daly & Lisa R. Lattuca, 2022. "Systems thinking assessments in engineering: A systematic literature review," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(4), pages 840-866, July.
    8. Kokko, Ari & Tingvall, Patrik Gustavsson & Videnord, Josefin, 2015. "The growth effects of R&D spending in the EU: A meta-analysis," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 9, pages 1-26.
    9. Jason M. Orr & Jonathon P. Leider & Margaret J. Gutilla, 2023. "System approaches in governmental public health: Findings from an analysis of the literature," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(1), pages 159-169, January.
    10. Li-Min Chuang & Wen-Chia Tsai, 2014. "The Organizational Innovativeness Inventory for information and electronic enterprises: Development and Validation," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 6(4), pages 302-309.
    11. Ogrean Claudia, 2019. "Some Insights On The World’S Most Innovative Companies And Their Defining Characteristics," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 14(2), pages 88-104, August.
    12. Simon Feeny & Mark McGillivray, 2008. "What Determines Bilateral Aid Allocations? Evidence From Time Series Data," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(3), pages 515-529, August.
    13. Jaap Dronkers & Nils Kornder, 2013. "Can gender differences in the educational performance of 15-year old migrant pupils be explained by the gender equality in the countries of origin and destination?," RF Berlin - CReAM Discussion Paper Series 1307, Rockwool Foundation Berlin (RF Berlin) - Centre for Research and Analysis of Migration (CReAM).
    14. Thakur, Ramendra & Hsu, Sonya H.Y. & Fontenot, Gwen, 2012. "Innovation in healthcare: Issues and future trends," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(4), pages 562-569.
    15. Bravo-Ortega, Claudio & García Marín, Álvaro, 2011. "R&D and Productivity: A Two Way Avenue?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 39(7), pages 1090-1107, July.
    16. Gurgul, Henryk & Lach, Łukasz, 2012. "Technological progress and economic growth: evidence from Poland," MPRA Paper 52279, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Nicholas C. Georgantzas & Evangelos G. Katsamakas, 2008. "Information systems research with system dynamics," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 24(3), pages 247-264, September.
    18. Małgorzata Kosała, 2015. "Innovation Processes as a Stimulant of Internationalisation Process of Firms," Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, Centre for Strategic and International Entrepreneurship at the Cracow University of Economics., vol. 3(2), pages 65-84.
    19. Hyunju Rachel Kim, 2014. "Formulation of a Success Model in Pharmaceutical R&D," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(1), pages 21582440145, March.
    20. Lehnert, Patrick & Pfister, Curdin & Backes-Gellner, Uschi, 2020. "Employment of R&D personnel after an educational supply shock: Effects of the introduction of Universities of Applied Sciences in Switzerland," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:16:p:10099-:d:889013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.