IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i15p9663-d881257.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Prospective Comparative Analysis Regarding the Assessment of Oral Mucosal Disease Using a Validated Questionnaire to Improve the Teaching of Dental Students

Author

Listed:
  • Nico Roeschmann

    (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Glückstraße 11, 91054 Erlangen, Germany)

  • Andrea Rau

    (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany)

  • Marco R. Kesting

    (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Glückstraße 11, 91054 Erlangen, Germany)

  • Eva Maier

    (Dental Clinic 1—Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Glückstrasse 11, 91054 Erlangen, Germany)

  • Mayte Buchbender

    (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Glückstraße 11, 91054 Erlangen, Germany)

Abstract

Structured examination and treatment are essential in medicine. For dental students, a structured approach to the assessment of oral mucosal lesions is missing thus far. To validate an approach, a structured questionnaire was compared with the habitually used free description of oral lesions (white lesions, ulcers, hyperplasia). Thirty-three dental students were divided into two groups (Group 1 ( n = 17) used the free description; Group 2 ( n = 16) used a guided questionnaire) to characterize mucosal lesions in patients and make a tentative diagnosis. Although no difference was found between the groups regarding the suspected diagnosis or the histopathological findings, there was a significant advantage of the structured questionnaire in all aspects of the description compared to the free description ( p = 0.000018). Thus, a structured description is an important aspect in the evaluation of oral mucosal changes, and a guided questionnaire should be implemented in the study of dentistry.

Suggested Citation

  • Nico Roeschmann & Andrea Rau & Marco R. Kesting & Eva Maier & Mayte Buchbender, 2022. "A Prospective Comparative Analysis Regarding the Assessment of Oral Mucosal Disease Using a Validated Questionnaire to Improve the Teaching of Dental Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-12, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:15:p:9663-:d:881257
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/15/9663/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/15/9663/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Silvio Abati & Chiara Bramati & Stefano Bondi & Alessandra Lissoni & Matteo Trimarchi, 2020. "Oral Cancer and Precancer: A Narrative Review on the Relevance of Early Diagnosis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-14, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anca Maria Pop & Raluca Coroș & Alexandra Mihaela Stoica & Monica Monea, 2021. "Early Diagnosis of Oral Mucosal Alterations in Smokers and E-Cigarette Users Based on Micronuclei Count: A Cross-Sectional Study among Dental Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Oscar Toralla & Pia Lopez Jornet & Eduardo Pons-Fuster, 2022. "The Effect of an Informative Video upon Anxiety and Stress in Patients Requiring an Oral Biopsy: A Randomized Controlled Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-11, January.
    3. Yuki Taguchi & Shigeaki Toratani & Kensaku Matsui & Seiya Hayashi & Natsuki Eboshida & Atsuko Hamada & Nanako Ito & Fumitaka Obayashi & Naohiro Kimura & Souichi Yanamoto, 2022. "Evaluation of Oral Mucosal Lesions Using the IllumiScan ® Fluorescence Visualisation Device: Distinguishing Squamous Cell Carcinoma," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-10, August.
    4. Xiner Wang & Guo Bai & Jizhi Liang & Qianyang Xie & Zhaohan Chen & Erda Zhou & Meng Li & Xiaoling Wei & Liuyang Sun & Zhiyuan Zhang & Chi Yang & Tiger H. Tao & Zhitao Zhou, 2024. "Gustatory interface for operative assessment and taste decoding in patients with tongue cancer," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-10, December.
    5. repec:eur:ejnmjr:80 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Shih-Wei Yang & Yun-Shien Lee & Pei-Wen Wu & Liang-Che Chang & Cheng-Cheng Hwang, 2021. "A Retrospective Cohort Study of Oral Leukoplakia in Female Patients—Analysis of Risk Factors Related to Treatment Outcomes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-17, August.
    7. repec:eur:ejnmjr:72 is not listed on IDEAS

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:15:p:9663-:d:881257. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.