IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i15p9239-d874345.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Dynamic Outcomes of Containment Strategies against COVID-19 under Different Public Health Governance Structures: A Comparison between Pakistan and Bangladesh

Author

Listed:
  • Weiwei Zhang

    (Research Institute of Economics and Management, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 610074, China)

  • Thomas Huggins

    (Division of Science & Technology, BNU-HKBU United International College, Zhuhai 519087, China)

  • Wenwen Zheng

    (Personal Finance Department, HQ of China Construction Bank, Beijing 100033, China)

  • Shiyong Liu

    (Institute of Advanced Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences, Beijing Normal University at Zhuhai, Zhuhai 519087, China)

  • Zhanwei Du

    (Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Hong Kong University, Hong Kong, China)

  • Hongli Zhu

    (Research Institute of Economics and Management, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 610074, China)

  • Ahmad Raza

    (Research Institute of Economics and Management, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 610074, China)

  • Ahmad Hussen Tareq

    (Ministry of National Health Services Regulations and Coordination, Islamabad 44010, Pakistan
    Health Services Academy, Islamabad 44010, Pakistan)

Abstract

COVID-19 scenarios were run using an epidemiological mathematical model (system dynamics model) and counterfactual analysis to simulate the impacts of different control and containment measures on cumulative infections and deaths in Bangladesh and Pakistan. The simulations were based on national-level data concerning vaccination level, hospital capacity, and other factors, from the World Health Organization, the World Bank, and the Our World in Data web portal. These data were added to cumulative infections and death data from government agencies covering the period from 18 March 2020 to 28 February 2022. Baseline curves for Pakistan and Bangladesh were obtained using piecewise fitting with a consideration of different events against the reported data and allowing for less than 5% random errors in cumulative infections and deaths. The results indicate that Bangladesh could have achieved more reductions in each key outcome measure by shifting its initial lockdown at least five days backward, while Pakistan would have needed to extend its lockdown to achieve comparable improvements. Bangladesh’s second lockdown appears to have been better timed than Pakistan’s. There were potential benefits from starting the third lockdown two weeks earlier for Bangladesh and from combining this with the fourth lockdown or canceling the fourth lockdown altogether. Adding a two-week lockdown at the beginning of the upward slope of the second wave could have led to a more than 40 percent reduction in cumulative infections and a 35 percent reduction in cumulative deaths for both countries. However, Bangladesh’s reductions were more sensitive to the duration of the lockdown. Pakistan’s response was more constrained by medical resources, while Bangladesh’s outcomes were more sensitive to both vaccination timing and capacities. More benefits were lost when combining multiple scenarios for Bangladesh compared to the same combinations in Pakistan. Clearly, cumulative infections and deaths could have been highly impacted by adjusting the control and containment measures in both national settings. However, COVID-19 outcomes were more sensitive to adjustment interventions for the Bangladesh context. Disaggregated analyses, using a wider range of factors, may reveal several sub-national dynamics. Nonetheless, the current research demonstrates the relevance of lockdown timing adjustments and discrete adjustments to several other control and containment measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Weiwei Zhang & Thomas Huggins & Wenwen Zheng & Shiyong Liu & Zhanwei Du & Hongli Zhu & Ahmad Raza & Ahmad Hussen Tareq, 2022. "Assessing the Dynamic Outcomes of Containment Strategies against COVID-19 under Different Public Health Governance Structures: A Comparison between Pakistan and Bangladesh," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-22, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:15:p:9239-:d:874345
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/15/9239/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/15/9239/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shiyong Liu & Hong Xue & Yan Li & Judy Xu & Youfa Wang, 2018. "Investigating the Diffusion of Agent†based Modelling and System Dynamics Modelling in Population Health and Healthcare Research," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(2), pages 203-215, March.
    2. D C Lane & E Husemann, 2008. "System dynamics mapping of acute patient flows," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(2), pages 213-224, February.
    3. Hunt, J.C.R. & Timoshkina, Y. & Baudains, P. J. & Bishop, S.R., 2012. "System Dynamics Applied to Operations and Policy Decisions," European Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(3), pages 324-342, May.
    4. Shiyong Liu & Nathaniel Osgood & Qi Gao & Hong Xue & Youfa Wang, 2016. "Systems simulation model for assessing the sustainability and synergistic impacts of sugar-sweetened beverages tax and revenue recycling on childhood obesity prevention," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 67(5), pages 708-721, May.
    5. Nina J. Zhu & Raheelah Ahmad & Alison Holmes & Julie V. Robotham & Reda Lebcir & Rifat Atun, 2021. "System dynamics modelling to formulate policy interventions to optimise antibiotic prescribing in hospitals," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(11), pages 2490-2502, November.
    6. Levy, D.T. & Bauer, J.E. & Lee, H.-R., 2006. "Simulation modeling and tobacco control: Creating more robust public health policies," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 96(3), pages 494-498.
    7. Homer, J.B. & Hirsch, G.B., 2006. "System dynamics modeling for public health: Background and opportunities," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 96(3), pages 452-458.
    8. Jones, A.P. & Homer, J.B. & Murphy, D.L. & Essien, J.D.K. & Milstein, B. & Seville, D.A. & Barnes, K., 2006. "Understanding diabetes population dynamics through simulation modeling and experimentation," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 96(3), pages 488-494.
    9. Abel Brodeur & David Gray & Anik Islam & Suraiya Bhuiyan, 2021. "A literature review of the economics of COVID‐19," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(4), pages 1007-1044, September.
    10. Jalali, Mohammad S. & Rahmandad, Hazhir & Bullock, Sally Lawrence & Lee-Kwan, Seung Hee & Gittelsohn, Joel & Ammerman, Alice, 2019. "Dynamics of intervention adoption, implementation, and maintenance inside organizations: The case of an obesity prevention initiative," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 224(C), pages 67-76.
    11. S C Brailsford & V A Lattimer & P Tarnaras & J C Turnbull, 2004. "Emergency and on-demand health care: modelling a large complex system," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(1), pages 34-42, January.
    12. Viana, J. & Brailsford, S.C. & Harindra, V. & Harper, P.R., 2014. "Combining discrete-event simulation and system dynamics in a healthcare setting: A composite model for Chlamydia infection," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(1), pages 196-206.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Negar Darabi & Niyousha Hosseinichimeh, 2020. "System dynamics modeling in health and medicine: a systematic literature review," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 36(1), pages 29-73, January.
    2. Mohammad Reza Davahli & Waldemar Karwowski & Redha Taiar, 2020. "A System Dynamics Simulation Applied to Healthcare: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-27, August.
    3. S Vanderby & M W Carter, 2010. "An evaluation of the applicability of system dynamics to patient flow modelling," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(11), pages 1572-1581, November.
    4. Hassmiller Lich, Kristen & Urban, Jennifer Brown & Frerichs, Leah & Dave, Gaurav, 2017. "Extending systems thinking in planning and evaluation using group concept mapping and system dynamics to tackle complex problems," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 254-264.
    5. Hosking, Michael & Roberts, Stephen & Uzsoy, Reha & Joseph, Talisa M., 2013. "Investigating interventions for increasing colorectal cancer screening: Insights from a simulation model," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 142-155.
    6. Willoughby, Keith A. & Chan, Benjamin T.B. & Marques, Shauna, 2016. "Using simulation to test ideas for improving speech language pathology services," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(2), pages 657-664.
    7. Md Mahfuzur Rahman & Rubayet Karim & Md. Moniruzzaman & Md. Afjal Hossain & Hammad Younes, 2023. "Modeling Hospital Operating Theater Services: A System Dynamics Approach," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-21, November.
    8. Levy, David T. & Hyland, Andrew & Higbee, Cheryl & Remer, Lillian & Compton, Christine, 2007. "The role of public policies in reducing smoking prevalence in California: Results from the California Tobacco Policy Simulation Model," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(2), pages 167-185, July.
    9. Morgan, Jennifer Sian & Howick, Susan & Belton, Valerie, 2017. "A toolkit of designs for mixing Discrete Event Simulation and System Dynamics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(3), pages 907-918.
    10. Willis, Graham & Cave, Siôn & Kunc, Martin, 2018. "Strategic workforce planning in healthcare: A multi-methodology approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(1), pages 250-263.
    11. M Smits, 2010. "Impact of policy and process design on the performance of intake and treatment processes in mental health care: a system dynamics case study," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(10), pages 1437-1445, October.
    12. D C Lane & E Husemann, 2008. "System dynamics mapping of acute patient flows," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(2), pages 213-224, February.
    13. R M Lebcir & R A Atun & R J Coker, 2010. "System Dynamic simulation of treatment policies to address colliding epidemics of tuberculosis, drug resistant tuberculosis and injecting drug users driven HIV in Russia," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(8), pages 1238-1248, August.
    14. John Pastor Ansah & Keith Low Sheng Hng & Salman Ahmad & Cheryl Goh, 2021. "Evaluating the impact of upstream and downstream interventions on chronic kidney disease and dialysis care: a simulation analysis," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 37(1), pages 32-58, January.
    15. Amin Mahmoudian-Dehkordi & Somayeh Sadat, 2017. "Sustaining critical care: using evidence-based simulation to evaluate ICU management policies," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 532-547, December.
    16. Özge Karanfil & Niyousha Hosseinichimeh & Jim Duggan, 2020. "System dynamics and bio‐medical modeling," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 36(4), pages 389-396, October.
    17. Gökçe Esenduran & John V. Gray & Burcu Tan, 2022. "A Dynamic Analysis of Supply Chain Risk Management and Extended Payment Terms," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(3), pages 1394-1417, March.
    18. Iza Gigauri & Mirela Panait & Simona Andreea Apostu & Lukman Raimi, 2022. "The Essence of Social Entrepreneurship through a Georgian Lens: Social Entrepreneurs’ Perspectives," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, June.
    19. Phurichai Rungcharoenkitkul, 2021. "Macroeconomic effects of COVID‐19: A mid‐term review," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(4), pages 439-458, October.
    20. Chang, Pao-Long & Ho, Shu-Ping & Hsu, Chiung-Wen, 2013. "Dynamic simulation of government subsidy policy effects on solar water heaters installation in Taiwan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 385-396.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:15:p:9239-:d:874345. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.