IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i14p8670-d864328.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatio-Temporal Evolution and Obstacle Factors Analysis of Tourism Ecological Security in Huanggang Dabieshan UNESCO Global Geopark

Author

Listed:
  • Mengting Chen

    (School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Liang Zheng

    (Changjiang Institute of Survey, Planning, Design and Research, Wuhan 430014, China
    Key Laboratory of Changjiang Regulation and Protection of Ministry of Water Resources, Wuhan 430014, China)

  • Dike Zhang

    (School of Foreign Languages, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Jiangfeng Li

    (School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

Abstract

The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) Global Geoparks (UGGp) and geotourism activities not only improve people’s scientific quality by popularizing geoscience knowledge, but also play important roles in protecting precious geoheritages and promoting the development of regional economies. However, tourism activities also have a negative impact on the local ecological environment, placing the regional ecological system under great pressure. Therefore, this paper constructed a tourism ecological security evaluation indicator system suitable for geoparks by using the “Driving-Pressure-State-Impact-Response” (DPSIR) model. The spatial autocorrelation and obstacle degree model are used to analyze the spatio-temporal characteristics and influencing factors of the tourism ecological security index (TESI) of Huanggang Dabieshan UGGp in 2000, 2005, 2010, 2015 and 2018, respectively. The results indicate that the TESI of the study area has gradually improved from 2000 to 2018. Spatially, the level of TESI presents a gradient distribution from the townships where the main scenic spots are located to the surrounding townships. The main obstacle factors affecting TESI include: per capita tourism income, proportion of comprehensive tourism revenue in GDP, per capita net income of rural residents, proportion of tertiary industry in GDP, coverage of nature reserves, planning integrity of geopark, informatization of geopark, growth rate of tourists, comprehensive utilization rate of solid waste, etc. The influencing factors of TESI varied from time to time. Balancing the conflict between local tourism activities and environmental protection, encouraging the participation of local communities, and strengthening science popularization for the local public will effectively improve the tourism ecological security of geoparks.

Suggested Citation

  • Mengting Chen & Liang Zheng & Dike Zhang & Jiangfeng Li, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Evolution and Obstacle Factors Analysis of Tourism Ecological Security in Huanggang Dabieshan UNESCO Global Geopark," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-22, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:14:p:8670-:d:864328
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/14/8670/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/14/8670/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ran He & Zhen Tang & Zengchuan Dong & Shiyun Wang, 2020. "Performance Evaluation of Regional Water Environment Integrated Governance: Case Study from Henan Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-13, April.
    2. Emmanuel Kazuva & Jiquan Zhang & Zhijun Tong & Alu Si & Li Na, 2018. "The DPSIR Model for Environmental Risk Assessment of Municipal Solid Waste in Dar es Salaam City, Tanzania," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-30, August.
    3. Shanshan Guo & Yinghong Wang, 2019. "Ecological Security Assessment Based on Ecological Footprint Approach in Hulunbeir Grassland, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-16, November.
    4. Han, Baolong & Liu, Hongxiao & Wang, Rusong, 2015. "Urban ecological security assessment for cities in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei metropolitan region based on fuzzy and entropy methods," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 318(C), pages 217-225.
    5. Jianying Xu & Feifei Fan & Yanxu Liu & Jianquan Dong & Jixing Chen, 2019. "Construction of Ecological Security Patterns in Nature Reserves Based on Ecosystem Services and Circuit Theory: A Case Study in Wenchuan, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-15, September.
    6. York, Richard & Rosa, Eugene A. & Dietz, Thomas, 2003. "STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT: analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 351-365, October.
    7. Cooper, Philip, 2013. "Socio-ecological accounting: DPSWR, a modified DPSIR framework, and its application to marine ecosystems," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 106-115.
    8. Yichen Yan & Hongrun Ju & Shengrui Zhang & Guokun Chen, 2021. "The Construction of Ecological Security Patterns in Coastal Areas Based on Landscape Ecological Risk Assessment—A Case Study of Jiaodong Peninsula, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-16, November.
    9. Kotchen, Matthew J. & Boyle, Kevin J. & Leiserowitz, Anthony A., 2013. "Willingness-to-pay and policy-instrument choice for climate-change policy in the United States," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 617-625.
    10. Meiwei Tang & Shouzhong Ge, 2018. "Accounting for carbon emissions associated with tourism-related consumption," Tourism Economics, , vol. 24(5), pages 510-525, August.
    11. J. Keith Ord & Arthur Getis, 2001. "Testing for Local Spatial Autocorrelation in the Presence of Global Autocorrelation," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(3), pages 411-432, August.
    12. Xiaoman Liu & Dong Jiang & Qiao Wang & Huiming Liu & Jin Li & Zhuo Fu, 2016. "Evaluating the Sustainability of Nature Reserves Using an Ecological Footprint Method: A Case Study in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-9, December.
    13. Mehdi Ben Jebli & Slim Ben Youssef & Nicholas Apergis, 2019. "The dynamic linkage between renewable energy, tourism, CO2 emissions, economic growth, foreign direct investment, and trade," Latin American Economic Review, Springer;Centro de Investigaciòn y Docencia Económica (CIDE), vol. 28(1), pages 1-19, December.
    14. Ji Chai & Zhanqi Wang & Hongwei Zhang, 2017. "Integrated Evaluation of Coupling Coordination for Land Use Change and Ecological Security: A Case Study in Wuhan City of Hubei Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-21, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kun Wang & Xiangtai Chen & Zhenxian Lei & Songxin Zhao & Xiao Zhou, 2023. "The Effects of Tourism Development on Eco-Environment Resilience and Its Spatio-Temporal Heterogeneity in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-19, November.
    2. Kun Wang & Songxin Zhao & Xiangtai Chen & Zhenxian Lei & Xiao Zhou, 2023. "Spatio-Temporal Evolution and Influencing Factors of the Resilience of Tourism Environmental Systems in the Yangtze River Economic Belt of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, July.
    3. Jan Andrzej Wendt & Agnieszka Bógdał-Brzezińska, 2024. "Security and Securitization as Topics in Sustainability and Tourism Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-15, January.
    4. Junyuan Zhao & Shengjie Wang & Jiayue Li, 2023. "Study on the Spatial–Temporal Pattern and Driving Mechanism of Tourism Eco-Security in the Yellow River Basin," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-20, February.
    5. Wei Liu & Jinyan Zhan & Yongbo Zhai & Fen Zhao & Michael Asiedu Kumi & Chao Wang & Chunyue Bai & Huihui Wang, 2023. "Linking Ecosystem Service Supply and Demand to Evaluate the Ecological Security in the Pearl River Delta Based on the Pressure-State-Response Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-14, February.
    6. Yingchang Li & Zhenzhen Liu & Gaifang Liu, 2023. "Evaluation of Tourism Ecological Security Based on Driving Force–Pressure–State–Influence–Response Framework and Analysis of Its Dynamic Evolution Characteristics and Driving Factors in Chinese Provin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-22, September.
    7. Hongyan Li & Gangmin Weng & Dapeng Wang, 2024. "Assessing the Sustainable Development Level of the Tourism Eco-Security System in the Chengdu-Chongqing Urban Agglomeration: A Comprehensive Analysis of Dynamic Evolution Characteristics and Driving F," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-26, August.
    8. Zhaofeng Wang & Dongchun Huang & Jing Wang, 2023. "Exploring Spatial Correlations of Tourism Ecological Security in China: A Perspective from Social Network Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-15, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lingfan Ju & Yan Liu & Jin Yang & Mingshun Xiang & Qing Xiang & Wenkai Hu & Zhengyi Ding, 2023. "Construction of Nature Reserves’ Ecological Security Pattern Based on Landscape Ecological Risk Assessment: A Case Study of Garze Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, May.
    2. Xiaoyang Liu & Ming Wei & Jian Zeng, 2020. "Simulating Urban Growth Scenarios Based on Ecological Security Pattern: A Case Study in Quanzhou, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-20, October.
    3. Rahman, Mohammad Mafizur & Vu, Xuan-Binh, 2020. "The nexus between renewable energy, economic growth, trade, urbanisation and environmental quality: A comparative study for Australia and Canada," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 617-627.
    4. Ali, Qamar & Yaseen, Muhammad Rizwan & Anwar, Sofia & Makhdum, Muhammad Sohail Amjad & Khan, Muhammad Tariq Iqbal, 2021. "The impact of tourism, renewable energy, and economic growth on ecological footprint and natural resources: A panel data analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    5. Xi Chen & Dawei Xu & Safa Fadelelseed & Lianying Li, 2019. "Spatiotemporal Analysis and Control of Landscape Eco-Security at the Urban Fringe in Shrinking Resource Cities: A Case Study in Daqing, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-26, November.
    6. Claudia García-García & Catalina B. García-García & Román Salmerón, 2021. "Confronting collinearity in environmental regression models: evidence from world data," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 30(3), pages 895-926, September.
    7. Kruse, Tobias & Atkinson, Giles, 2022. "Understanding public support for international climate adaptation payments: Evidence from a choice experiment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    8. Ren, Siyu & Hao, Yu & Xu, Lu & Wu, Haitao & Ba, Ning, 2021. "Digitalization and energy: How does internet development affect China's energy consumption?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    9. Fan, Fei & Dai, Shangze & Yang, Bo & Ke, Haiqian, 2023. "Urban density, directed technological change, and carbon intensity: An empirical study based on Chinese cities," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    10. Nicole Grunewald & Inmaculada Martínez-Zarzoso, 2009. "Driving Factors of Carbon Dioxide Emissions and the Impact from Kyoto Protocol," Ibero America Institute for Econ. Research (IAI) Discussion Papers 190, Ibero-America Institute for Economic Research.
    11. Juan Antonio Duro & Jordi Teixidó-Figueras & Emilio Padilla, 2017. "The Causal Factors of International Inequality in $$\hbox {CO}_{2}$$ CO 2 Emissions Per Capita: A Regression-Based Inequality Decomposition Analysis," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 67(4), pages 683-700, August.
    12. Lei Gao & Taowu Pei & Jingran Zhang & Yu Tian, 2022. "The “Pollution Halo” Effect of FDI: Evidence from the Chinese Sichuan–Chongqing Urban Agglomeration," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-17, September.
    13. Saikku, Laura & Rautiainen, Aapo & Kauppi, Pekka E., 2008. "The sustainability challenge of meeting carbon dioxide targets in Europe by 2020," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 730-742, February.
    14. Yang, Yuanyuan & Bao, Wenkai & Liu, Yansui, 2020. "Scenario simulation of land system change in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    15. Liddle, Brantley, 2013. "Population, Affluence, and Environmental Impact Across Development: Evidence from Panel Cointegration Modeling," MPRA Paper 52088, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Ling Xiong & Shaozhou Qi, 2018. "Financial Development And Carbon Emissions In Chinese Provinces: A Spatial Panel Data Analysis," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 63(02), pages 447-464, March.
    17. Zhenxiang Cao & Liqing Peng, 2023. "The Impact of Digital Economics on Environmental Quality: A System Dynamics Approach," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    18. Xi Liu & Yugang He & Renhong Wu, 2024. "Revolutionizing Environmental Sustainability: The Role of Renewable Energy Consumption and Environmental Technologies in OECD Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-21, January.
    19. Casey, Gregory & Galor, Oded, 2017. "Is faster economic growth compatible with reductions in carbon emissions? The role of diminished population growth," MPRA Paper 76164, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Aihua Wang & Qiqi Ruan & Teng Zhou & Yanzhen Wang, 2022. "Digitizable Product Trade Development and Carbon Emission: Evidence from 94 Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-15, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:14:p:8670-:d:864328. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.