IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i13p7785-d847331.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Italy Tweeted about COVID-19: Detecting Reactions to the Pandemic from Social Media

Author

Listed:
  • Valentina Lorenzoni

    (Institute of Management and Department of Excellence EMbeDS, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, 56127 Pisa, Italy)

  • Gianni Andreozzi

    (Institute of Management and Department of Excellence EMbeDS, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, 56127 Pisa, Italy)

  • Andrea Bazzani

    (Institute of Management and Department of Excellence EMbeDS, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, 56127 Pisa, Italy)

  • Virginia Casigliani

    (Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy)

  • Salvatore Pirri

    (Institute of Management and Department of Excellence EMbeDS, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, 56127 Pisa, Italy)

  • Lara Tavoschi

    (Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy)

  • Giuseppe Turchetti

    (Institute of Management and Department of Excellence EMbeDS, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, 56127 Pisa, Italy)

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic required communities throughout the world to deal with unknown threats. Using Twitter data, this study aimed to detect reactions to the outbreak in Italy and to evaluate the relationship between measures derived from social media (SM) with both national epidemiological data and reports on the violations of the restrictions. The dynamics of time-series about tweets counts, emotions expressed, and themes discussed were evaluated using Italian posts regarding COVID-19 from 25 February to 4 May 2020. Considering 4,988,255 tweets, results highlight that emotions changed significantly over time with anger, disgust, fear, and sadness showing a downward trend, while joy, trust, anticipation, and surprise increased. The trend of emotions correlated significantly with national variation in confirmed cases and reports on the violations of restrictive measures. The study highlights the potential of using SM to assess emotional and behavioural reactions, delineating their possible contribution to the establishment of a decision management system during emergencies.

Suggested Citation

  • Valentina Lorenzoni & Gianni Andreozzi & Andrea Bazzani & Virginia Casigliani & Salvatore Pirri & Lara Tavoschi & Giuseppe Turchetti, 2022. "How Italy Tweeted about COVID-19: Detecting Reactions to the Pandemic from Social Media," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-14, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:13:p:7785-:d:847331
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/13/7785/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/13/7785/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Viet-Phuong La & Thanh-Hang Pham & Manh-Toan Ho & Minh-Hoang Nguyen & Khanh-Linh P. Nguyen & Thu-Trang Vuong & Hong-Kong T. Nguyen & Trung Tran & Quy Khuc & Manh-Tung Ho & Quan-Hoang Vuong, 2020. "Policy Response, Social Media and Science Journalism for the Sustainability of the Public Health System Amid the COVID-19 Outbreak: The Vietnam Lessons," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-27, April.
    2. Chan, Man-pui Sally & Winneg, Kenneth & Hawkins, Lauren & Farhadloo, Mohsen & Jamieson, Kathleen Hall & Albarracín, Dolores, 2018. "Legacy and social media respectively influence risk perceptions and protective behaviors during emerging health threats: A multi-wave analysis of communications on Zika virus cases," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 50-59.
    3. Bal, Roland & de Graaff, Bert & van de Bovenkamp, Hester & Wallenburg, Iris, 2020. "Practicing Corona – Towards a research agenda of health policies," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(7), pages 671-673.
    4. Shao, Wanyun & Hao, Feng, 2020. "Confidence in political leaders can slant risk perceptions of COVID–19 in a highly polarized environment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    5. Jeremy Ginsberg & Matthew H. Mohebbi & Rajan S. Patel & Lynnette Brammer & Mark S. Smolinski & Larry Brilliant, 2009. "Detecting influenza epidemics using search engine query data," Nature, Nature, vol. 457(7232), pages 1012-1014, February.
    6. Cynthia Chew & Gunther Eysenbach, 2010. "Pandemics in the Age of Twitter: Content Analysis of Tweets during the 2009 H1N1 Outbreak," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(11), pages 1-13, November.
    7. Gregg, Rebecca & Patel, Ajay & Patel, Sumaiya & O’Connor, Laura, 2017. "Public reaction to the UK government strategy on childhood obesity in England: A qualitative and quantitative summary of online reaction to media reports," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(4), pages 450-457.
    8. David A Broniatowski & Michael J Paul & Mark Dredze, 2013. "National and Local Influenza Surveillance through Twitter: An Analysis of the 2012-2013 Influenza Epidemic," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-1, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zeynep Ertem & Dorrie Raymond & Lauren Ancel Meyers, 2018. "Optimal multi-source forecasting of seasonal influenza," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-16, September.
    2. Jose L Herrera & Ravi Srinivasan & John S Brownstein & Alison P Galvani & Lauren Ancel Meyers, 2016. "Disease Surveillance on Complex Social Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(7), pages 1-16, July.
    3. Ibrahim Musa & Hyun Woo Park & Lkhagvadorj Munkhdalai & Keun Ho Ryu, 2018. "Global Research on Syndromic Surveillance from 1993 to 2017: Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, September.
    4. Fantazzini, Dean, 2020. "Short-term forecasting of the COVID-19 pandemic using Google Trends data: Evidence from 158 countries," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 59, pages 33-54.
    5. Samuel V Scarpino & James G Scott & Rosalind M Eggo & Bruce Clements & Nedialko B Dimitrov & Lauren Ancel Meyers, 2020. "Socioeconomic bias in influenza surveillance," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(7), pages 1-19, July.
    6. Hongying Dai & Brian R. Lee & Jianqiang Hao, 2017. "Predicting Asthma Prevalence by Linking Social Media Data and Traditional Surveys," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 669(1), pages 75-92, January.
    7. Taesik Lee & Hayong Shin, 2016. "Combining syndromic surveillance and ILI data using particle filter for epidemic state estimation," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 233-253, June.
    8. Jingwei Li & Choon-Ling Sia & Zhuo Chen & Wei Huang, 2021. "Enhancing Influenza Epidemics Forecasting Accuracy in China with Both Official and Unofficial Online News Articles, 2019–2020," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-13, June.
    9. Gianpaolo Zammarchi & Francesco Mola & Claudio Conversano, 2023. "Using sentiment analysis to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on Italy’s country reputation and stock market performance," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 32(3), pages 1001-1022, September.
    10. Cordova, Amado & Stanley, Karlyn D., 2021. "Public-private partnership for building a resilient broadband infrastructure in Puerto Rico," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(4).
    11. Amir Hassan Zadeh & Hamed M. Zolbanin & Ramesh Sharda & Dursun Delen, 2019. "Social Media for Nowcasting Flu Activity: Spatio-Temporal Big Data Analysis," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 743-760, August.
    12. Qiong Jia & Yue Guo & Guanlin Wang & Stuart J. Barnes, 2020. "Big Data Analytics in the Fight against Major Public Health Incidents (Including COVID-19): A Conceptual Framework," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-21, August.
    13. Sequoia I Leuba & Reza Yaesoubi & Marina Antillon & Ted Cohen & Christoph Zimmer, 2020. "Tracking and predicting U.S. influenza activity with a real-time surveillance network," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-14, November.
    14. Tomeny, Theodore S. & Vargo, Christopher J. & El-Toukhy, Sherine, 2017. "Geographic and demographic correlates of autism-related anti-vaccine beliefs on Twitter, 2009-15," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 168-175.
    15. Logan C Brooks & David C Farrow & Sangwon Hyun & Ryan J Tibshirani & Roni Rosenfeld, 2018. "Nonmechanistic forecasts of seasonal influenza with iterative one-week-ahead distributions," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-29, June.
    16. Manuel Hermosilla & Jian Ni & Haizhong Wang & Jin Zhang, 2023. "Leveraging the E-commerce footprint for the surveillance of healthcare utilization," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 604-625, December.
    17. Kumar, Anand & Priya, Bhawna & Srivastava, Samir K., 2021. "Response to the COVID-19: Understanding implications of government lockdown policies," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 76-94.
    18. David H Chae & Sean Clouston & Mark L Hatzenbuehler & Michael R Kramer & Hannah L F Cooper & Sacoby M Wilson & Seth I Stephens-Davidowitz & Robert S Gold & Bruce G Link, 2015. "Association between an Internet-Based Measure of Area Racism and Black Mortality," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-12, April.
    19. Fathey Mohammed & Nabil Hasan Al-Kumaim & Ahmed Ibrahim Alzahrani & Yousef Fazea, 2023. "The Impact of Social Media Shared Health Content on Protective Behavior against COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-16, January.
    20. Vuong, Quan-Hoang & Huyen, Nguyen Thanh Thanh & Pham, Thanh-Hang & Phuong, Luong Anh & Nguyen, Minh-Hoang, 2020. "Mapping the intellectual and conceptual structure of research on gender issues in the family business: A bibliometric review," OSF Preprints jgnrw, Center for Open Science.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:13:p:7785-:d:847331. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.