IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i11p6903-d831909.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Startup of Demo-Scale Anaerobic Digestion Plant Treating Food Waste Leachate: Process Instability and Recovery

Author

Listed:
  • Seung Gu Shin

    (Department of Energy Engineering, Future Convergence Technology Research Institute, Gyeongsang National University, 33 Dongjin-ro, Jinju 52828, Korea
    Department of Energy System Engineering, Gyeongsang National University, 33 Dongjin-ro, Jinju 52828, Korea)

  • Su In Kim

    (Division of Environmental Science and Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology, 77 Cheongam-ro, Pohang 37673, Korea)

  • Seokhwan Hwang

    (Division of Environmental Science and Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology, 77 Cheongam-ro, Pohang 37673, Korea
    Institute for Convergence Research and Education in Advanced Technology (I-CREATE), Yonsei University, 85 Songdogwahak-ro, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon 21983, Korea)

Abstract

A demo-scale (600 m 3 working volume) anaerobic digester treating food waste leachate was monitored during its startup period. The operation strategy was adjusted twice (i.e., three distinct phases) during the operation to recover the process from instability. During the first phase, the organic loading rate (OLR) > 2.7 kg chemical oxygen demand (COD)/m 3 ∙day corresponded to volatile fatty acid (VFA) accumulation along with a decreasing pH, resulting in the drop in biogas yield to 0.43 ± 0.9 m 3 /kg COD in . During phase 2, fast recovery of this process was aimed at using a sequencing batch operation. One batch cycle (5 to 2 days) consisted of the combined drawing and feeding step (5 h), the reacting step (91 to 17 h), and the settling step (24 h). The duration of the reacting step was determined for each cycle such that (1) the biogas production ceased before the cycle end and (2) the residual VFA concentration was < 1 g/L. In total, 11 cycles were operated with a gradual increase in biogas yield to 0.55 m 3 /kg COD in with the absence of any sign of system disturbance. After phase 2, the digester was fed at the designed OLR of 4.1 ± 0.3 kg COD/m 3 ∙day. The biogas yield was elevated to 0.58 ± 0.2 m 3 /kg COD in during phase 3 with the residual VFA concentration maintained at 2.2 ± 0.6 g/L. Methanogen populations, as determined by real-time PCR, did not change significantly throughout the period. These results imply that the adaptation of this process to the OLR of ca. 4 kg COD/m 3 ∙day was not due to the increase in methanogen population but due to the elevation of its activity. Overall, this study suggests that the sequencing batch operation with adjustable cycle duration can be one successful recovery strategy for biogas plants under system instability.

Suggested Citation

  • Seung Gu Shin & Su In Kim & Seokhwan Hwang, 2022. "Startup of Demo-Scale Anaerobic Digestion Plant Treating Food Waste Leachate: Process Instability and Recovery," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-10, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:11:p:6903-:d:831909
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/11/6903/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/11/6903/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jay N. Meegoda & Brian Li & Kush Patel & Lily B. Wang, 2018. "A Review of the Processes, Parameters, and Optimization of Anaerobic Digestion," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Li, Yue & Chen, Yinguang & Wu, Jiang, 2019. "Enhancement of methane production in anaerobic digestion process: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 120-137.
    3. Mohammed Ali Musa & Syazwani Idrus & Che Man Hasfalina & Nik Norsyahariati Nik Daud, 2018. "Effect of Organic Loading Rate on Anaerobic Digestion Performance of Mesophilic (UASB) Reactor Using Cattle Slaughterhouse Wastewater as Substrate," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-19, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria Salud Camilleri-Rumbau & Kelly Briceño & Lene Fjerbæk Søtoft & Knud Villy Christensen & Maria Cinta Roda-Serrat & Massimiliano Errico & Birgir Norddahl, 2021. "Treatment of Manure and Digestate Liquid Fractions Using Membranes: Opportunities and Challenges," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-30, March.
    2. Arthur Chevalier & Philippe Evon & Florian Monlau & Virginie Vandenbossche & Cecilia Sambusiti, 2023. "Twin-Screw Extrusion Mechanical Pretreatment for Enhancing Biomethane Production from Agro-Industrial, Agricultural and Catch Crop Biomasses," Waste, MDPI, vol. 1(2), pages 1-18, May.
    3. Sharvini, Siva Raman & Noor, Zainura Zainon & Chong, Chun Shiong & Stringer, Lindsay C & Glew, David, 2020. "Energy generation from palm oil mill effluent: A life cycle assessment of two biogas technologies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    4. Luis G. Cortés & J. Barbancho & D. F. Larios & J. D. Marin-Batista & A. F. Mohedano & C. Portilla & M. A. de la Rubia, 2022. "Full-Scale Digesters: Model Predictive Control with Online Kinetic Parameter Identification Strategy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-23, November.
    5. Ahmadi, Ehsan & Yousefzadeh, Samira & Mokammel, Adel & Miri, Mohammad & Ansari, Mohsen & Arfaeinia, Hossein & Badi, Mojtaba Yegane & Ghaffari, Hamid Reza & Rezaei, Soheila & Mahvi, Amir Hossein, 2020. "Kinetic study and performance evaluation of an integrated two-phase fixed-film baffled bioreactor for bioenergy recovery from wastewater and bio-wasted sludge," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    6. Yongping Li & Jiaoning Zhu & Yun Tang & Xiangyuan Shi & Sumera Anwar & Juanling Wang & Li Gao & Jingxuan Zhang, 2023. "Impact of Varying Mass Concentrations of Ammonia Nitrogen on Biogas Production and System Stability of Anaerobic Fermentation," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-14, August.
    7. Shuhei Matsuda & Takahiro Yamato & Yoshiyuki Mochizuki & Yoshinori Sekiguchi & Takashi Ohtsuki, 2020. "Batch-Mode Analysis of Thermophilic Methanogenic Microbial Community Changes in the Overacidification Stage in Beverage Waste Treatment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-13, October.
    8. Sun, Hui & Wang, Enzhen & Li, Xiang & Cui, Xian & Guo, Jianbin & Dong, Renjie, 2021. "Potential biomethane production from crop residues in China: Contributions to carbon neutrality," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    9. Li, Xinxin & Tong, Jingjing & Yuan, Maomao & Song, Mei & Gao, Jingsi & Zhu, Jia & Liu, Yanping, 2023. "Demonstrating the application of batch anaerobic digestion recirculating slurry inoculation of food waste engineering from a microbiological perspective," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    10. Guimarães de Oliveira, Maurício & Marques Mourão, José Marcos & Marques de Oliveira, Ana Katherinne & Bezerra dos Santos, André & Lopes Pereira, Erlon, 2021. "Microaerophilic treatment enhanced organic matter removal and methane production rates during swine wastewater treatment: A long-term engineering evaluation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 691-699.
    11. Chaves, Gustavo T. & Teles, Felipe & Balbo, Antonio R. & dos Reis, Célia A. & Florentino, Helenice de Oliveira, 2024. "Mathematical modelling of biodigestion in an Indian biodigester and its stability analysis via Lyapunov technique," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    12. Sukriti Singh & Nehil Shreyash & Venkateswara R. Kode & Xianghong Qian & S. Ranil Wickramasinghe, 2024. "Review of Separation and Purification of Biobased Derivatives Produced from Food Waste for Industrial Use," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 905-928, June.
    13. Magdalena Zdeb & Marta Bis & Artur Przywara, 2023. "Multi-Criteria Analysis of the Influence of Lignocellulosic Biomass Pretreatment Techniques on Methane Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-14, January.
    14. Joisleen Ramírez & Euclides Deago & Arthur Mc Carty James Rivas, 2024. "Effect of Biochar on Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Untreated Sewage Sludge with Municipal Organic Waste under Mesophilic Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-18, May.
    15. Yang, Min & Watson, Jamison & Wang, Zixin & Si, Buchun & Jiang, Weizhong & Zhou, Bo & Zhang, Yuanhui, 2022. "Understanding and design of two-stage fermentation: A perspective of interspecies electron transfer," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    16. Yu, Qilin & Mao, Haohao & Zhao, Zhiqiang & Zhang, Yaobin, 2023. "Electro-polarization of the sludge with dynamic magnetic field enhanced the interspecies electron transfer in ZVI-added anaerobic digesters," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    17. Malyan, Sandeep K. & Kumar, Smita S. & Fagodiya, Ram Kishor & Ghosh, Pooja & Kumar, Amit & Singh, Rajesh & Singh, Lakhveer, 2021. "Biochar for environmental sustainability in the energy-water-agroecosystem nexus," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    18. Tiina M. Komulainen & Kjell Rune Jonassen & Simen Gjelseth Antonsen, 2024. "Estimation and Control of WRRF Biogas Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-20, November.
    19. Florentios Economou & Irene Voukkali & Iliana Papamichael & Valentina Phinikettou & Pantelitsa Loizia & Vincenzo Naddeo & Paolo Sospiro & Marco Ciro Liscio & Christos Zoumides & Diana Mihaela Țîrcă & , 2024. "Turning Food Loss and Food Waste into Watts: A Review of Food Waste as an Energy Source," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-30, June.
    20. Wu, Benteng & Lin, Richen & O'Shea, Richard & Deng, Chen & Rajendran, Karthik & Murphy, Jerry D., 2021. "Production of advanced fuels through integration of biological, thermo-chemical and power to gas technologies in a circular cascading bio-based system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:11:p:6903-:d:831909. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.