IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2021i1p274-d712206.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evolution of the Spatial-Temporal Pattern and Social Performance Evaluation of Community Sports and Fitness Venues in Shanghai

Author

Listed:
  • Feng Sun

    (School of Geographic and Oceanographic Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
    Huangshan Park Ecosystem Observation and Research Station, Ministry of Education, Huangshan 245899, China)

  • Jinhe Zhang

    (School of Geographic and Oceanographic Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
    Huangshan Park Ecosystem Observation and Research Station, Ministry of Education, Huangshan 245899, China)

  • Jingxuan Ma

    (School of Geographic and Oceanographic Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
    Huangshan Park Ecosystem Observation and Research Station, Ministry of Education, Huangshan 245899, China)

  • Chang Wang

    (School of Geographic and Oceanographic Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
    Huangshan Park Ecosystem Observation and Research Station, Ministry of Education, Huangshan 245899, China)

  • Senlin Hu

    (The Center for Modern Chinese City Studies, School of Urban and Regional Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China)

  • Dong Xu

    (School of Geographic and Oceanographic Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
    Huangshan Park Ecosystem Observation and Research Station, Ministry of Education, Huangshan 245899, China)

Abstract

The study of the spatial-temporal pattern and social performance of urban public services is a basic task for achieving urban fairness and justice. Through spatial analysis and social performance evaluation, this study explores the evolution of spatial-temporal patterns and the social performance of community sports and fitness venues in Shanghai from 1982 to 2019. The results show that the construction of Shanghai’s community sports and fitness venues presents the evolution pattern of “urbanization-suburbanization-reurbanization”. The center of construction has always been in the urban area and first moved toward the south and then toward the north. Government investment was the main source of funds for the construction of venues, and social investment has been steadily growing. The number and area of multiple types of venues has increased significantly, including trails, gymnasiums, and courts. The overall service coverage radius of Shanghai’s community sports and fitness venues has been significantly increased, and the regional equality between the core and peripheral areas has been obviously improved. The overall per capita service location entropy has not been significantly improved. The old city center and the peripheral area have always been the low-value areas, and the old city center is surrounded by high-value areas. The “low-high-low” three-circle spatial structure continues to exist, but around the old city center, the scope of the high-value area has expanded markedly. There was a significant optimization of social performance from 1999 to 2009. The social performance of the community sports and fitness venues in urban areas is better than that in suburban areas, but the optimization of social performance in suburban areas is greater than that in urban areas. The above analysis is expected to provide references for rationally arranging urban sports and fitness spaces, enhancing the fairness of urban public services, improving the quality of residents’ lives, and assisting the implementation of the “Healthy China” national strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Feng Sun & Jinhe Zhang & Jingxuan Ma & Chang Wang & Senlin Hu & Dong Xu, 2021. "Evolution of the Spatial-Temporal Pattern and Social Performance Evaluation of Community Sports and Fitness Venues in Shanghai," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-17, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2021:i:1:p:274-:d:712206
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/1/274/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/1/274/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jossef Perl & Peng-Kuan Ho, 1990. "Public Facilities Location under Elastic Demand," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 117-136, May.
    2. Nelson, Cynthia A. & Wolch, Jennifer R., 1985. "Intrametropolitan planning for community-based residential care: A goals programming approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 205-212.
    3. Delbosc, Alexa & Currie, Graham, 2011. "Using Lorenz curves to assess public transport equity," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 1252-1259.
    4. Gareth J. Jones & Michael B. Edwards & Jason N. Bocarro & Kyle S. Bunds & Jordan W. Smith, 2018. "Leveraging community sport organizations to promote community capacity: Strategic outcomes, challenges, and theoretical considerations," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 279-292, July.
    5. van Lenthe, F. J. & Brug, J. & Mackenbach, J. P., 2005. "Neighbourhood inequalities in physical inactivity: the role of neighbourhood attractiveness, proximity to local facilities and safety in the Netherlands," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(4), pages 763-775, February.
    6. Leon Cooper, 1963. "Location-Allocation Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 11(3), pages 331-343, June.
    7. Richard Church & Charles R. Velle, 1974. "The Maximal Covering Location Problem," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 101-118, January.
    8. Jones, Gareth J. & Edwards, Michael B. & Bocarro, Jason N. & Bunds, Kyle S. & Smith, Jordan W., 2018. "Leveraging community sport organizations to promote community capacity: Strategic outcomes, challenges, and theoretical considerations," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 279-292.
    9. Geoff Riddington & Hervey Gibson & John Anderson, 2006. "Comparison of Gravity Model, Survey and Location Quotient-based Local Area Tables and Multipliers," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(9), pages 1069-1081.
    10. Wu, Belinda M. & Hine, Julian P., 2003. "A PTAL approach to measuring changes in bus service accessibility," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 307-320, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jinghong Shen & Jianquan Cheng & Wencong Huang & Fantao Zeng, 2020. "An Exploration of Spatial and Social Inequalities of Urban Sports Facilities in Nanning City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-19, May.
    2. Fadda, Edoardo & Manerba, Daniele & Cabodi, Gianpiero & Camurati, Paolo Enrico & Tadei, Roberto, 2021. "Comparative analysis of models and performance indicators for optimal service facility location," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    3. Apantri Peungnumsai & Hiroyuki Miyazaki & Apichon Witayangkurn & Sohee Minsun Kim, 2020. "A Grid-Based Spatial Analysis for Detecting Supply–Demand Gaps of Public Transports: A Case Study of the Bangkok Metropolitan Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-27, December.
    4. Hayton, John W. & Blundell, Milly & Cullinane, Danny & Walker, Catherine M., 2019. "Building an inclusive cycling “movement”: Exploring the charity-led mobilisation of recreational cycling in communities across Merseyside, England," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 21-37.
    5. Xiaoshu Cao & Huiling Chen & Feiwen Liang & Wulin Wang, 2018. "Measurement and Spatial Differentiation Characteristics of Transit Equity: A Case Study of Guangzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-17, April.
    6. Karner, Alex, 2018. "Assessing public transit service equity using route-level accessibility measures and public data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 24-32.
    7. Pyrialakou, V. Dimitra & Gkritza, Konstantina & Fricker, Jon D., 2016. "Accessibility, mobility, and realized travel behavior: Assessing transport disadvantage from a policy perspective," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 252-269.
    8. Seongman Jang & Youngsoo An & Changhyo Yi & Seungil Lee, 2017. "Assessing the spatial equity of Seoul’s public transportation using the Gini coefficient based on its accessibility," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 91-107, January.
    9. Guzman, Luis A. & Oviedo, Daniel & Rivera, Carlos, 2017. "Assessing equity in transport accessibility to work and study: The Bogotá region," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 236-246.
    10. Sharma, Ishant & Mishra, Sabyasachee & Golias, Mihalis M. & Welch, Timothy F. & Cherry, Christopher R., 2020. "Equity of transit connectivity in Tennessee cities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    11. Ruiz, Maurici & Segui-Pons, Joana Maria & Mateu-LLadó, Jaume, 2017. "Improving Bus Service Levels and social equity through bus frequency modelling," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 220-233.
    12. Che, Feng & Zhou, Yalin & Liu, Yipeng, 2022. "Social Quality, Knowledge Hiding, and Community Capacity: A Study on Multi-Ethnic Communities in Chinese Cities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 1024-1038.
    13. Jones, Gareth J. & Edwards, Michael B. & Bocarro, Jason N. & Svensson, Per G. & Misener, Katie, 2020. "A community capacity building approach to sport-based youth development," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 563-575.
    14. Rock, Sarah & Ahern, Aoife & Caulfield, Brian, 2016. "The economic boom, bust and transport inequity in suburban Dublin, Ireland," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 32-43.
    15. Wei, Ran & Liu, Xiaoyue & Mu, Yongjian & Wang, Liming & Golub, Aaron & Farber, Steven, 2017. "Evaluating public transit services for operational efficiency and access equity," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 70-79.
    16. Lei He & Ziang Xie, 2022. "Optimization of Urban Shelter Locations Using Bi-Level Multi-Objective Location-Allocation Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-18, April.
    17. Kamruzzaman, Md. & Baker, Douglas & Washington, Simon & Turrell, Gavin, 2013. "Residential dissonance and mode choice," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 12-28.
    18. Tammy Drezner & Zvi Drezner, 2019. "Cooperative Cover of Uniform Demand," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 819-831, September.
    19. Alan T. Murray, 2016. "Maximal Coverage Location Problem," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 39(1), pages 5-27, January.
    20. Boisjoly, Geneviève & Serra, Bernardo & Oliveira, Gabriel T. & El-Geneidy, Ahmed, 2020. "Accessibility measurements in São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Curitiba and Recife, Brazil," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2021:i:1:p:274-:d:712206. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.