IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i9p4920-d549085.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Importance of Peer Mentoring, Identity Work and Holding Environments: A Study of African American Leadership Development

Author

Listed:
  • Audrey J. Murrell

    (Katz School of Business, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA)

  • Stacy Blake-Beard

    (Tuck School of Business, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA)

  • David M. Porter

    (Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94105, USA
    Opinions and conclusions herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Federal Reserve System and the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.)

Abstract

Mentoring is well-known for its positive impact on diversity and inclusion across a wide variety of organizational contexts. Despite these demonstrated advantages, efforts to develop diverse leaders either through access to informal mentoring relationships or via formal mentoring programs are often complex, expensive, and frequently produce mixed results. We examine the unique impact of peer mentoring to support and develop African American leaders using a formalized program approach. Our findings show that peer mentoring is effective in providing a safe environment for the necessary work of identity to take place among African American leaders. This identity work takes the form of holding behaviors such as enabling perspectives, empathic acknowledgement and containment that are critical for the development, support and validation of diverse leaders. Our findings clearly show the benefit of external identity peer mentors for providing support and validation for African American leaders that can be absent within traditional hierarchical mentoring. By examining the outcomes of an actual leadership development program over time, we provide recommendations on how to enhance diverse leadership development by recognizing and cultivating the positive impact of identity-based peer mentoring.

Suggested Citation

  • Audrey J. Murrell & Stacy Blake-Beard & David M. Porter, 2021. "The Importance of Peer Mentoring, Identity Work and Holding Environments: A Study of African American Leadership Development," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-19, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:9:p:4920-:d:549085
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/9/4920/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/9/4920/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erika Hayes James, 2000. "Race-Related Differences in Promotions and Support: Underlying Effects of Human and Social Capital," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(5), pages 493-508, October.
    2. Dolors Setó-Pamies & Eleni Papaoikonomou, 2016. "A Multi-level Perspective for the Integration of Ethics, Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability (ECSRS) in Management Education," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 136(3), pages 523-538, July.
    3. Margaret A. Meyer, 1994. "The Dynamics of Learning with Team Production: Implications for Task Assignment," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 109(4), pages 1157-1184.
    4. Martine R. Haas & Morten T. Hansen, 2007. "Different knowledge, different benefits: toward a productivity perspective on knowledge sharing in organizations," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(11), pages 1133-1153, November.
    5. Viator, Ralph E., 2001. "The association of formal and informal public accounting mentoring with role stress and related job outcomes," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 73-93, January.
    6. Ikujiro Nonaka, 1994. "A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(1), pages 14-37, February.
    7. Donald E. Gibson, 2003. "Developing the Professional Self-Concept: Role Model Construals in Early, Middle, and Late Career Stages," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(5), pages 591-610, October.
    8. Kilduff, Martin, 1990. "The interpersonal structure of decision making: A social comparison approach to organizational choice," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 270-288, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jeannette E. South-Paul & Kendall M. Campbell & Norma Poll-Hunter & Audrey J. Murrell, 2021. "Mentoring as a Buffer for the Syndemic Impact of Racism and COVID-19 among Diverse Faculty within Academic Medicine," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-10, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ma, Danni, 2023. "How does the negotiation between “me” and “we” in professional identity influence interpersonal horizontal knowledge sharing in multinational enterprises: A conceptual model," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(4).
    2. Muhammad Ali Butt & Faisal Nawaz & Saddam Hussain & Maria José Sousa & Minhong Wang & Muhammad Saleem Sumbal & Muhammad Shujahat, 2019. "Individual knowledge management engagement, knowledge-worker productivity, and innovation performance in knowledge-based organizations: the implications for knowledge processes and knowledge-based sys," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 336-356, September.
    3. Pattravadee Ploykitikoon & Charles M. Weber, 2019. "Knowledge Pathways and Performance: An Empirical Study of the National Laboratories in a Technology Latecomer Country," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(03), pages 1-37, May.
    4. Gülru F. Özkan-Seely & Cheryl Gaimon & Stylianos Kavadias, 2015. "Dynamic Knowledge Transfer and Knowledge Development for Product and Process Design Teams," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 17(2), pages 177-190, May.
    5. Christopher C.A. Chan & Gary S. Monroe & Juliana Ng & Rebecca Chyi Woan Tan, 2008. "Effects of Employee Support on Junior Accountants' Job Attitudes and Intention to Quit," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 18(2), pages 149-162, June.
    6. Zerbini, Fabrizio & Borghini, Stefania, 2015. "Release capacity in the vendor selection process," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 405-414.
    7. Ferguson, J.E. & Huysman, M.H., 2009. "Between ambition and approach: towards sustainable knowledge management in development organizations," Serie Research Memoranda 0003, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    8. Ferlie, Ewan & Crilly, Tessa & Jashapara, Ashok & Peckham, Anna, 2012. "Knowledge mobilisation in healthcare: A critical review of health sector and generic management literature," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(8), pages 1297-1304.
    9. Josef Windsperger & Nina Gorovaia, 2011. "Knowledge attributes and the choice of knowledge transfer mechanism in networks: the case of franchising," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 15(4), pages 617-640, November.
    10. Shujahat, Muhammad & Sousa, Maria José & Hussain, Saddam & Nawaz, Faisal & Wang, Minhong & Umer, Muhammad, 2019. "Translating the impact of knowledge management processes into knowledge-based innovation: The neglected and mediating role of knowledge-worker productivity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 442-450.
    11. Vasile MAZILESCU, 2012. "Knowledge Analysis in Terms of Representation,Processing based Mobilisation and Distribution," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 1, pages 21-36.
    12. Gabriel Szulanski & Dimo Ringov & Robert J. Jensen, 2016. "Overcoming Stickiness: How the Timing of Knowledge Transfer Methods Affects Transfer Difficulty," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 304-322, April.
    13. Fascia, Michael, 2019. "Knowledge transfer structures," OSF Preprints x394t, Center for Open Science.
    14. Yan Xin & Ville Ojanen, 2022. "Knowledge Reuse in Product-Service Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-17, November.
    15. Megan Lawrence, 2020. "Replication using templates: Does the unit learn from itself, the template, or both?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(11), pages 1955-1982, November.
    16. Rayees Farooq & Sandeep Vij, 2019. "Does Market Orientation Mediate between Knowledge Management Orientation and Business Performance?," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(04), pages 1-35, December.
    17. Fogarty, Timothy J. & Reinstein, Alan & Heath, Rebekah A. & Sinason, David H., 2017. "Why mentoring does not always reduce turnover: The intervening roles of value congruence, organizational knowledge and supervisory satisfaction," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 63-74.
    18. Stewart R. Miller & Marie Louise Mors & Michael McDonald, 2019. "Expectations for Help Within and Across the Formal Boundaries of Executives’ Professional Advice Networks," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 59(4), pages 617-642, August.
    19. Kelly A. Mollica & Barbara Gray & Linda K. Treviño, 2003. "Racial Homophily and Its Persistence in Newcomers' Social Networks," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(2), pages 123-136, April.
    20. Law, Kuok Kei, 2014. "The problem with knowledge ambiguity," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 444-450.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:9:p:4920-:d:549085. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.