IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i8p4048-d534523.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Home Mechanical Ventilation: A Patient’s Perspective Survey Study

Author

Listed:
  • Magdalena Kwiatosz-Muc

    (Department of Aneasthesiological and Intensive Care Nursing, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland)

  • Bożena Kopacz

    (Department of Aneasthesiological and Intensive Care Nursing, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland)

Abstract

Background: An increasing number of patients included in home mechanical ventilation (HMV) care has been under observation for many years. The study aimed to assess the patients opinion concerning the expected and perceived quality of care in an HMV system and a patient’s satisfaction with care. Methods: In 2017, patients treated with HMV were surveyed in Poland with the modified SERVQUAL questionnaire. Results: One hundred correctly completed surveys were analyzed. Patient Satisfaction Index was high. In every examined area, the expectations were statistically significant larger than the perception of the services. The biggest gap was in the tangibility dimension and the smallest gap was in the empathy dimension. Perceived respect and understanding for a patient’s needs are close to the expectations. Conclusions: The level of satisfaction with health care among patients treated with HMV in majority of investigated components is high. Moreover, the difference between perceived and expected quality of health care in the HMV system was relatively small in the opinion of the patients themselves. Further investigations with alternative methods are needed.

Suggested Citation

  • Magdalena Kwiatosz-Muc & Bożena Kopacz, 2021. "Home Mechanical Ventilation: A Patient’s Perspective Survey Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-8, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:8:p:4048-:d:534523
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/8/4048/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/8/4048/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sever, Ivan, 2015. "Importance-performance analysis: A valid management tool?," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 43-53.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. NaHyun Lee & Bong-Seok Kim, 2023. "Differences of Host Country-Destination Image Assessment for International Students According to Risk Perception in COVID-19 Tourism," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, July.
    2. Lin, Zhibin & Vlachos, Ilias, 2018. "An advanced analytical framework for improving customer satisfaction: A case of air passengers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 185-195.
    3. Sung-Shun Weng & Yang Liu & Yen-Ching Chuang, 2019. "Reform of Chinese Universities in the Context of Sustainable Development: Teacher Evaluation and Improvement Based on Hybrid Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-23, October.
    4. Pumpe, Andreas & Vallée, Franz, 2015. "The Total Landed Cost Concept. Begging for Answers," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Blecker, Thorsten & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Operational Excellence in Logistics and Supply Chains: Optimization Methods, Data-driven Approaches and Security Insights. Proceedings of the Hamburg , volume 22, pages 31-54, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    5. Kong, Minjin & Lee, Minhyun & Kang, Hyuna & Hong, Taehoon, 2021. "Development of a framework for evaluating the contents and usability of the building life cycle assessment tool," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    6. Torres Matovelle, Pablo & Molina Molina, Gina, 2019. "Evaluation of crowding and tourist satisfaction in the practice of humpback whale - watching, the case of Puerto López - Ecuador," Cuadernos de Gestión, Universidad del País Vasco - Instituto de Economía Aplicada a la Empresa (IEAE).
    7. Yu-Hung Chien & Fang-Yu Chang, 2023. "An importance-performance analysis of teachers’ perception of STEM engineering design education," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
    8. Esmailpour, Javad & Aghabayk, Kayvan & Abrari Vajari, Mohammad & De Gruyter, Chris, 2020. "Importance – Performance Analysis (IPA) of bus service attributes: A case study in a developing country," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 129-150.
    9. Jeong-Sil Choi & Se-Young Ju, 2022. "A Study of Food Safety Knowledge for Sustainable Foodservice Management of Childcare Centers in South Korea Using Importance–Performance Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-14, August.
    10. Chi-Cheng Chen & Jia Wei Chook & Linh Bao Nguyen & Chun-Hung Lee, 2024. "Integrating Locals’ Importance–Performance Perception of Community Resilience into Sustainable Indigenous Tourism Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-19, June.
    11. Olimpia Iuliana Ban & Roxana Hatos & Nicoleta-Georgeta Bugnar & Dinu Sasu & Adela Laura Popa & Andreea-Florina Fora, 2024. "Evaluation of the Quality of Higher Education Services by Revised IPA in the Perspective of Digitization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-22, April.
    12. Gianluca Goffi & Magdalena Cladera & Linda Osti, 2020. "Sun, Sand, and… Sustainability in Developing Countries from a Tourists’ Perspective. The Case of Punta Cana," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-14, June.
    13. Echaniz, Eneko & Ho, Chinh Q. & Rodriguez, Andres & dell'Olio, Luigi, 2019. "Comparing best-worst and ordered logit approaches for user satisfaction in transit services," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 752-769.
    14. Bentz, Julia & Lopes, Fernando & Calado, Helena & Dearden, Philip, 2016. "Enhancing satisfaction and sustainable management: Whale watching in the Azores," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 465-476.
    15. Yanchun Jin & Yoonseo Park, 2019. "An Integrated Approach to Determining Rural Tourist Satisfaction Factors Using the IPA and Conjoint Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-16, October.
    16. Cai, Gangwei & Xu, Binyan & Lu, Feidong & Lu, Ye, 2023. "The promotion strategies and dynamic evaluation model of exhibition-driven sustainable tourism based on previous/prospective tourist satisfaction after COVID-19," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    17. Šťastná Milada & Vaishar Antonín & Ryglová Kateřina & Rašovská Ida & Zámečník Silvie, 2020. "Cultural Tourism as a Possible Driver of Rural Development in Czechia. Wine Tourism in Moravia as a Case Study," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 12(3), pages 292-311, September.
    18. Danilo Gambelli & Francesco Solfanelli & Stefano Orsini & Raffaele Zanoli, 2021. "Measuring the Economic Performance of Small Ruminant Farms Using Balanced Scorecard and Importance-Performance Analysis: A European Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-13, March.
    19. Babalola, Taiwo Oladapo, 2023. "Adopting Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) model to assess land governance in the peri-urban areas of Ibadan, Nigeria," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    20. Boley, B. Bynum & McGehee, Nancy Gard & Tom Hammett, A.L., 2017. "Importance-performance analysis (IPA) of sustainable tourism initiatives: The resident perspective," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 66-77.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:8:p:4048-:d:534523. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.