IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i5p2251-d505309.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Associations Between Older Driver Licensure Laws with Travel and Passenger Behaviors Among Adults Aged 65 Years or Older (United States, 2003–2017)

Author

Listed:
  • Sijun Shen

    (The Center for Injury Research and Policy, Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH 43205, USA
    Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43205, USA)

  • Marizen Ramirez

    (Division of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA)

  • Cara J. Hamann

    (Department of Epidemiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
    Injury Prevention Research Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA)

  • Nichole Morris

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, HumanFIRST Laboratory, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA)

  • Corinne Peek-Asa

    (Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52246, USA)

  • Motao Zhu

    (The Center for Injury Research and Policy, Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH 43205, USA
    Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43205, USA
    Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA)

Abstract

Introduction: The aging population has been rapidly growing in the United States (U.S.). In line with this trend, older adults’ mobility and transportation safety are an increasing priority. Many states have implemented driver licensure laws specific to older adults to limit driving among the elderly with driving skill decline. Evaluations of these laws have primarily focused on their safety benefits related to older drivers’ fatal crash rate or injury rate. However, very few studies investigated licensure law effects on older adults’ mobility. Objective: The objective of our study is to evaluate the association between older driver licensure laws and older adult daily traveling and passenger exposure. Methods: The 2003–2017 American Time Use Survey (ATUS) data were linked with statewide driver licensure law provisions. Adults aged 55–64 years were used as the reference group to control for the effects of non-licensure-law factors (e.g., economic trend). We used modified Poisson regressions with robust variance to estimate the relationships between licensure law provisions and the likelihoods of older men and women’s daily traveling and passenger behaviors. Results: Laws requiring a vision test at in-person renewal were associated with increased daily traveling likelihood for women aged 75 years or older, primarily as a passenger. Laws requiring a knowledge test were related to a reduced daily overall traveling likelihood for women aged 75 years or older. Conclusions: In general, licensure law provisions are not strongly related to older adults’ mobility, in particular for older male adults. Older female adults’ daily mobility may be more likely to be influenced by the change of licensure laws than older male adults. The existence of gender-based disparities in responding to licensure laws requires future studies to account for the gender difference in estimating the effects of those traffic policies on older adults’ mobility and traffic safety.

Suggested Citation

  • Sijun Shen & Marizen Ramirez & Cara J. Hamann & Nichole Morris & Corinne Peek-Asa & Motao Zhu, 2021. "The Associations Between Older Driver Licensure Laws with Travel and Passenger Behaviors Among Adults Aged 65 Years or Older (United States, 2003–2017)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-10, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:5:p:2251-:d:505309
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/5/2251/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/5/2251/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Satariano, W.A. & Guralnik, J.M. & Jackson, R.J. & Marottoli, R.A. & Phelan, E.A. & Prohaska, T.R., 2012. "Mobility and aging: New directions for public health action," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 102(8), pages 1508-1515.
    2. Stephanie J. Fonda & Robert B. Wallace & A. Regula Herzog, 2001. "Changes in Driving Patterns and Worsening Depressive Symptoms Among Older Adults," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 56(6), pages 343-351.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Keisuke Itotani & Ippei Suganuma & Hiroyuki Fujita, 2022. "Are the Physical and Cognitive Functions of Older Adults Affected by Having a Driver’s License?—A Pilot Study of Suburban Dwellers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-9, April.
    2. Satonori Nasu & Yu Ishibashi & Junichi Ikuta & Shingo Yamane & Ryuji Kobayashi, 2022. "Reliability and Validity of the Japanese Version of the Assessment of Readiness for Mobility Transition (ARMT-J) for Japanese Elderly," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-14, October.
    3. Spinney, Jamie E.L. & Newbold, K. Bruce & Scott, Darren M. & Vrkljan, Brenda & Grenier, Amanda, 2020. "The impact of driving status on out-of-home and social activity engagement among older Canadians," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    4. Klaus Hauer & Phoebe Ullrich & Patrick Heldmann & Laura Bauknecht & Saskia Hummel & Bastian Abel & Juergen M. Bauer & Sarah E. Lamb & Christian Werner, 2021. "Psychometric Properties of the Proxy-Reported Life-Space Assessment in Institutionalized Settings (LSA-IS-Proxy) for Older Persons with and without Cognitive Impairment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-17, April.
    5. Stephen Layfield & Wesley Burge & William Mitchell & Lesley Ross & Christine Denning & Frank Amthor & Kristina Visscher, 2014. "The Effect of Speed of Processing Training on Microsaccade Amplitude," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(9), pages 1-6, September.
    6. Ziqi Zhang & Zhi Qiu, 2020. "Exploring Daily Activity Patterns on the Typical Day of Older Adults for Supporting Aging-in-Place in China’s Rural Environment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-20, November.
    7. Saliu Adejumobi Balogun & Aravinda Meera Guntupalli, 2016. "Gender difference in the prevalence and socio-demographic correlates of mobility disability among older adults in Nigeria," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 231-239, September.
    8. Daniel Palac & Tiffany Bullard & Jason D. Cohen & Lydia T. Nguyen & Raksha A. Mudar & Sean P. Mullen, 2019. "Effects of Traditional vs. iPad-Enhanced Aerobic Exercise on Wayfinding Efficacy and Cognition: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-16, September.
    9. Piotr Skórka & Beata Grzywacz & Dawid Moroń & Magdalena Lenda, 2020. "The macroecology of the COVID-19 pandemic in the Anthropocene," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, July.
    10. Fatima Ghani & Jerome N Rachele & Venurs HY Loh & Simon Washington & Gavin Turrell, 2019. "Do Differences in Social Environments Explain Gender Differences in Recreational Walking across Neighbourhoods?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-18, June.
    11. Shulin Lai & Yuquan Zhou & Yuan Yuan, 2021. "Associations between Community Cohesion and Subjective Wellbeing of the Elderly in Guangzhou, China—A Cross-Sectional Study Based on the Structural Equation Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-23, January.
    12. Shiho Amagasa & Noritoshi Fukushima & Hiroyuki Kikuchi & Tomoko Takamiya & Yuko Odagiri & Koichiro Oka & Shigeru Inoue, 2018. "Drivers Are More Physically Active Than Non-Drivers in Older Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-12, May.
    13. María-Eugenia Prieto-Flores & Mark W. Rosenberg, 2021. "Moving around a Large City in Latin America: The Mobility Challenges Faced by Older Adults with Disabilities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-11, December.
    14. Haustein, Sonja & Siren, Anu, 2014. "Seniors’ unmet mobility needs – how important is a driving licence?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 45-52.
    15. Israel Schwarzlose, Alicia A. & Mjelde, James W. & Dudensing, Rebekka M. & Jin, Yanhong & Cherrington, Linda K. & Chen, Junyi, 2014. "Willingness to pay for public transportation options for improving the quality of life of the rural elderly," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 1-14.
    16. Antoine Langeard & Kathia Saillant & Elisabeth Charlebois Cloutier & Mathieu Gayda & Frédéric Lesage & Anil Nigam & Louis Bherer & Sarah A. Fraser, 2020. "Association between Statin Use and Balance in Older Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-9, June.
    17. Matthew Hodges & Dawn Butler & Ariel Spaulding & Debra K. Litzelman, 2023. "The Role of Community Health Workers in the Health and Well-Being of Vulnerable Older Adults during the COVID Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-12, February.
    18. Buehler, Ralph & Pucher, John & Wittwer, Rico & Gerike, Regine, 2024. "Trends and determinants of the mobility of older adults in the USA and Germany, 2001–2017," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    19. Xue Zhang & Mildred E. Warner & Elaine Wethington, 2020. "Can Age-Friendly Planning Promote Equity in Community Health Across the Rural-Urban Divide in the US?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-16, February.
    20. Susanne Nordbakke & Tim Schwanen, 2015. "Transport, unmet activity needs and wellbeing in later life: exploring the links," Transportation, Springer, vol. 42(6), pages 1129-1151, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:5:p:2251-:d:505309. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.