IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i21p13957-d954674.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reliability and Validity of the Japanese Version of the Assessment of Readiness for Mobility Transition (ARMT-J) for Japanese Elderly

Author

Listed:
  • Satonori Nasu

    (Department of Occupational Therapy, Graduate School of Human Health Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo 116-8551, Japan
    Department of Occupational Therapy, Nakaizu Rehabilitation Center, Shizuoka 410-2507, Japan)

  • Yu Ishibashi

    (Department of Occupational Therapy, Graduate School of Human Health Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo 116-8551, Japan)

  • Junichi Ikuta

    (Department of Occupational Therapy, Nakaizu Rehabilitation Center, Shizuoka 410-2507, Japan)

  • Shingo Yamane

    (Department of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aino University, Osaka 567-0012, Japan)

  • Ryuji Kobayashi

    (Department of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Okayama Healthcare Professional University, Okayama 700-0913, Japan)

Abstract

The Assessment of Readiness for Mobility Transition (ARMT) questionnaire assesses individuals’ emotional and attitudinal readiness related to mobility as they age. This study aimed to examine the reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the ARMT (ARMT-J). The ARMT-J and related variables were administered to 173 patients and staff members undergoing rehabilitation at hospitals in Japan. Construct validity was first examined using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to confirm cross-cultural validity. For structural validity, the optimal number of factors was confirmed using a Velicer’s minimum average partial test and parallel analysis, followed by exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Finally, a CFA was performed using the most appropriate model. Internal consistency, test–retest reliability, standard error of measurement (SEM), and smallest detectable change (SDC) were assessed for reliability. The CFA fit for the factor structure of the original ARMT was low. Therefore, the EFA was conducted with two to four factors. The optimal factor structure was three factors, with a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient and Cohen’s weighted kappa coefficient of 0.85 and 0.76, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of the test–retest was 0.93, the SEM was 0.72, and the SDC was 2.00. The model fit was good for the ARMT-J, with a three-factor structure.

Suggested Citation

  • Satonori Nasu & Yu Ishibashi & Junichi Ikuta & Shingo Yamane & Ryuji Kobayashi, 2022. "Reliability and Validity of the Japanese Version of the Assessment of Readiness for Mobility Transition (ARMT-J) for Japanese Elderly," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-14, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:13957-:d:954674
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/13957/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/13957/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephanie J. Fonda & Robert B. Wallace & A. Regula Herzog, 2001. "Changes in Driving Patterns and Worsening Depressive Symptoms Among Older Adults," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 56(6), pages 343-351.
    2. Briana Mezuk & George W. Rebok, 2008. "Social Integration and Social Support Among Older Adults Following Driving Cessation," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 63(5), pages 298-303.
    3. Melissa L. O'Connor & Jerri D. Edwards & Virginia G. Wadley & Michael Crowe, 2010. "Changes in Mobility Among Older Adults with Psychometrically Defined Mild Cognitive Impairment," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 65(3), pages 306-316.
    4. SeolHwa Moon & Kyongok Park, 2020. "The Predictors of Driving Cessation among Older Drivers in Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-13, October.
    5. Hirotugu Akaike, 1987. "Factor analysis and AIC," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 52(3), pages 317-332, September.
    6. Boon Hong Ang & Jennifer Anne Oxley & Won Sun Chen & Michelle Khai Khun Yap & Keang Peng Song & Shaun Wen Huey Lee, 2020. "The influence of spouses and their driving roles in self-regulation: A qualitative exploration of driving reduction and cessation practices amongst married older adults," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-14, May.
    7. Atsushi Nakamura & Michio Maruta & Hyuma Makizako & Masaaki Miyata & Hironori Miyata & Gwanghee Han & Yuriko Ikeda & Suguru Shimokihara & Keiichiro Tokuda & Takuro Kubozono & Mitsuru Ohishi & Takayuki, 2021. "Meaningful Activities and Psychosomatic Functions in Japanese Older Adults after Driving Cessation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-13, December.
    8. Melissa L. O'Connor & Jerri D. Edwards & Brent J. Small & Ross Andel, 2012. "Patterns of Level and Change in Self-Reported Driving Behaviors Among Older Adults: Who Self-Regulates?," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 67(4), pages 437-446.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrew Schouten & Martin Wachs & Evelyn A. Blumenberg & Hannah R. King, 2022. "Cohort analysis of driving cessation and limitation among older adults," Transportation, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 841-865, June.
    2. Jiwon Lee & Midam An & Yongku Kim & Jung-In Seo, 2021. "Optimal Allocation for Electric Vehicle Charging Stations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-10, September.
    3. Benjamin G Schultz & Catherine J Stevens & Peter E Keller & Barbara Tillmann, 2013. "A Sequence Identification Measurement Model to Investigate the Implicit Learning of Metrical Temporal Patterns," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(9), pages 1-1, September.
    4. Daniela Andreini & Diego Rinallo & Giuseppe Pedeliento & Mara Bergamaschi, 2017. "Brands and Religion in the Secularized Marketplace and Workplace: Insights from the Case of an Italian Hospital Renamed After a Roman Catholic Pope," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 141(3), pages 529-550, March.
    5. Andreas Wienke & Anne M. Herskind & Kaare Christensen & Axel Skytthe & Anatoli I. Yashin, 2002. "The influence of smoking and BMI on heritability in susceptibility to coronary heart disease," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2002-003, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    6. Keisuke Itotani & Ippei Suganuma & Hiroyuki Fujita, 2022. "Are the Physical and Cognitive Functions of Older Adults Affected by Having a Driver’s License?—A Pilot Study of Suburban Dwellers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-9, April.
    7. Byrd, T. A. & Marshall, T. E., 1997. "Relating information technology investment to organizational performance: a causal model analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 43-56, February.
    8. Berry, Brian J.L. & Okulicz-Kozaryn, Adam, 2008. "Are there ENSO signals in the macroeconomy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(3), pages 625-633, January.
    9. Nicos Nicolaou & Scott Shane, 2019. "Common genetic effects on risk-taking preferences and choices," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 59(3), pages 261-279, December.
    10. Stephen Richards, 2010. "Author's response," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 173(4), pages 920-924, October.
    11. Ken B Hanscombe & Maciej Trzaskowski & Claire M A Haworth & Oliver S P Davis & Philip S Dale & Robert Plomin, 2012. "Socioeconomic Status (SES) and Children's Intelligence (IQ): In a UK-Representative Sample SES Moderates the Environmental, Not Genetic, Effect on IQ," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(2), pages 1-16, February.
    12. Zhang, Quanzhong & Wei, Haiyan & Liu, Jing & Zhao, Zefang & Ran, Qiao & Gu, Wei, 2021. "A Bayesian network with fuzzy mathematics for species habitat suitability analysis: A case with limited Angelica sinensis (Oliv.) Diels data," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 450(C).
    13. Oh, Man-Suk, 2014. "Bayesian comparison of models with inequality and equality constraints," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 176-182.
    14. Bonaiuto, M. & Mosca, O. & Milani, A. & Ariccio, S. & Dessi, F. & Fornara, F., 2024. "Beliefs about technological and contextual features drive biofuels’ social acceptance," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PA).
    15. Hamparsum Bozdogan, 1987. "Model selection and Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC): The general theory and its analytical extensions," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 52(3), pages 345-370, September.
    16. Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, A C, 2002. "Trucking Industry Preferences for Driver Traveler Information Using Wireless Internet-enabled Devices," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt40q8h6sf, University of California Transportation Center.
    17. Schreier, Alayna & Stenersen, Madeline R. & Strambler, Michael J. & Marshall, Tim & Bracey, Jeana & Kaufman, Joy S., 2023. "Needs of caregivers of youth enrolled in a statewide system of care: A latent class analysis," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    18. Daisuke Matsumoto & Fujio Inui & Chika Honda & Rie Tomizawa & Mikio Watanabe & Karri Silventoinen & Norio Sakai, 2020. "Heritability and Environmental Correlation of Phase Angle with Anthropometric Measurements: A Twin Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-10, October.
    19. Sanjay Gupta & Kushagra Sinha, 2022. "Assessing the Factors Impacting Transport Usage of Mobility App Users in the National Capital Territory of Delhi, India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-20, October.
    20. Schomaker Michael & Heumann Christian, 2011. "Model Averaging in Factor Analysis: An Analysis of Olympic Decathlon Data," Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 1-15, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:13957-:d:954674. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.