IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i4p1712-d497315.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychosocial Characteristics by Weight Loss and Engagement in a Digital Intervention Supporting Self-Management of Weight

Author

Listed:
  • Ellen S. Mitchell

    (Academic Research, Noom, 229 W 28th St., New York, NY 10001, USA)

  • Qiuchen Yang

    (Academic Research, Noom, 229 W 28th St., New York, NY 10001, USA)

  • Heather Behr

    (Academic Research, Noom, 229 W 28th St., New York, NY 10001, USA
    Department of Integrative Health, Saybrook University, 55 W Eureka St, Pasadena, CA 91103, USA)

  • Annabell Ho

    (Academic Research, Noom, 229 W 28th St., New York, NY 10001, USA)

  • Laura DeLuca

    (Academic Research, Noom, 229 W 28th St., New York, NY 10001, USA
    Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Yeshiva University, 1165 Morris Park Ave, Bronx, NY 10461, USA)

  • Christine N. May

    (Academic Research, Noom, 229 W 28th St., New York, NY 10001, USA)

  • Andreas Michaelides

    (Academic Research, Noom, 229 W 28th St., New York, NY 10001, USA)

Abstract

There is substantial variability in weight loss outcomes. Psychosocial characteristics underlying outcomes require better understanding, particularly on self-managed digital programs. This cross-sectional study examines differences in psychosocial characteristics by weight loss and engagement outcome, and which characteristics are most associated with weight loss, on a self-managed digital weight loss program. Some underexplored psychosocial characteristics are included, such as flourishing, or a sense of meaning and purpose in life. A questionnaire was emailed to a random sample of 10,000 current users at week 5 in the program and 10,000 current users at week 17. The questionnaire was completed by 2225 users, and their self-reported weight and recorded program engagement data were extracted from the program’s database. Multiple comparison tests indicated that mental health quality of life, depression, anxiety, work-life balance, and flourishing differed by weight loss outcome at program end (week 17; ≥5%, 2–5%, below 2%) and by engagement tertile at program beginning and end (weeks 5 and 17). Only anxiety was associated with weight loss in a backward stepwise regression controlling for engagement and sociodemographic characteristics. Flourishing did not predict weight loss overall but predicted the weight loss outcome group. Our findings have implications for creating more effective interventions for individuals based on psychosocial characteristics and highlight the potential importance of anxiety in underexplored self-managed digital programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Ellen S. Mitchell & Qiuchen Yang & Heather Behr & Annabell Ho & Laura DeLuca & Christine N. May & Andreas Michaelides, 2021. "Psychosocial Characteristics by Weight Loss and Engagement in a Digital Intervention Supporting Self-Management of Weight," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-17, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:4:p:1712-:d:497315
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/4/1712/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/4/1712/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Regina L.T. Lee & Wai Tong Chien & Jason Ligot & Jennifer M. Nailes & Keiko Tanida & Sachi Takeuchi & Masanori Ikeda & Sachiyo Miyagawa & Toshisaburo Nagai & Rutja Phuphaibul & Chatsiri Mekviwattanawo, 2020. "Associations Between Quality of Life, Psychosocial Well-being and Health-Related Behaviors Among Adolescents in Chinese, Japanese, Taiwanese, Thai and the Filipino Populations: A Cross-Sectional Surve," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-20, April.
    2. José Ignacio Baile & Raquel María Guevara & María José González-Calderón & José David Urchaga, 2020. "The Relationship between Weight Status, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Life Satisfaction in a Sample of Spanish Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-9, April.
    3. Aickin, M. & Gensler, H., 1996. "Adjusting for multiple testing when reporting research results: The Bonferroni vs Holm methods," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 86(5), pages 726-728.
    4. Yvonne N. Flores & Zuelma A. Contreras & Paula Ramírez-Palacios & Leo S. Morales & Todd C. Edwards & Katia Gallegos-Carrillo & Jorge Salmerón & Cathy M. Lang & Noémie Sportiche & Donald L. Patrick, 2019. "Increased Prevalence of Psychosocial, Behavioral, and Socio-Environmental Risk Factors among Overweight and Obese Youths in Mexico and the United States," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-15, April.
    5. Cara D. Dolin & Rachel S. Gross & Andrea L. Deierlein & Lauren T. Berube & Michelle Katzow & Yasaman Yaghoubian & Sara G. Brubaker & Mary Jo Messito, 2020. "Predictors of Gestational Weight Gain in a Low-Income Hispanic Population: Sociodemographic Characteristics, Health Behaviors, and Psychosocial Stressors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-11, January.
    6. Keyes, C.L.M. & Simoes, E.J., 2012. "To flourish or not: Positive mental health and all-cause mortality," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 102(11), pages 2164-2172.
    7. Ed Diener & Derrick Wirtz & William Tov & Chu Kim-Prieto & Dong-won Choi & Shigehiro Oishi & Robert Biswas-Diener, 2010. "New Well-being Measures: Short Scales to Assess Flourishing and Positive and Negative Feelings," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 97(2), pages 143-156, June.
    8. Felicia Huppert & Timothy So, 2013. "Flourishing Across Europe: Application of a New Conceptual Framework for Defining Well-Being," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 110(3), pages 837-861, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Ying & Kubzansky, Laura D. & VanderWeele, Tyler J., 2019. "Parental warmth and flourishing in mid-life," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 65-72.
    2. Anna Parola & Jenny Marcionetti, 2022. "Positive Resources for Flourishing: The Effect of Courage, Self-Esteem, and Career Adaptability in Adolescence," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    3. Benjamin Heslop & Antony Drew & Elizabeth Stojanovski & Kylie Bailey & Jonathan Paul, 2018. "Collaboration Vouchers: A Policy to Increase Population Wellbeing," Societies, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-19, June.
    4. Rocío de la Fuente & Águeda Parra & Inmaculada Sánchez-Queija & Izarne Lizaso, 2020. "Flourishing During Emerging Adulthood from a Gender Perspective," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 21(8), pages 2889-2908, December.
    5. Sakari Kainulainen, 2020. "Flourishing within the Working-Aged Finnish Population," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 15(1), pages 187-205, March.
    6. Nona C. Kiknadze & Blaine J. Fowers, 2023. "Cultural Variation in Flourishing," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 24(7), pages 2223-2244, October.
    7. Liu, Yinbo & Ni, Xiaoli & Niu, Gengfeng, 2020. "The influence of active social networking services use and social capital on flourishing in Chinese adolescents," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    8. Reuben D. Rusk, 2022. "An Adaptive Motivation Approach to Understanding the ‘How’ and ‘Why’ of Wellbeing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-24, October.
    9. Richard Andrew Burns & Dimity Ann Crisp & Jiayun Chng & Kristen Murray, 2022. "Community Members Prioritise Indicators of Both Mental Health and Wellbeing to Define Flourishing and Quality of Life: Towards The Total Psychological Health Framework," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 17(6), pages 3475-3502, December.
    10. Wenceslao Unanue & Eduardo Barros & Marcos Gómez, 2021. "The Longitudinal Link between Organizational Citizenship Behaviors and Three Different Models of Happiness," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-20, June.
    11. Thomas Hansen & Morten Blekesaune, 2022. "The age and well-being “paradox”: a longitudinal and multidimensional reconsideration," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 1277-1286, December.
    12. Alexandra Ganglmair-Wooliscroft & Ben Wooliscroft, 2019. "Well-Being and Everyday Ethical Consumption," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 141-163, January.
    13. Corey L. M. Keyes & Malik Muhammad Sohail & Nneka Jebose Molokwu & Heather Parnell & Cyrilla Amanya & Venkata Gopala Krishna Kaza & Yohannes Benyam Saddo & Vanroth Vann & Senti Tzudier & Rae Jean Proe, 2021. "How Would You Describe a Mentally Healthy Person? A Cross-Cultural Qualitative Study of Caregivers of Orphans and Separated Children," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 1719-1743, April.
    14. Andrzej K. Koźmiński & Adam Noga & Katarzyna Piotrowska & Krzysztof Zagórski, 2015. "Operationalization And Estimation Of Balanced Development Index For Poland 1999-2016," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 16(3), pages 461-487, September.
    15. Cho, Esther Yin-Nei & Yu, Fuk-Yuen, 2020. "A review of measurement tools for child wellbeing," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    16. Paola Conigliaro, 2022. "Subjective Well-Being in Italian Regions," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 161(2), pages 751-781, June.
    17. Allison Ross & Craig A. Talmage & Mark Searle, 2019. "Toward a Flourishing Neighborhood: the Association of Happiness and Sense of Community," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 14(5), pages 1333-1352, November.
    18. William E. Donald & Denise Jackson, 2022. "Subjective Wellbeing among University Students and Recent Graduates: Evidence from the United Kingdom," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-17, June.
    19. Ernesta Sofija & Neil Harris & Bernadette Sebar & Dung Phung, 2021. "Who Are the Flourishing Emerging Adults on the Urban East Coast of Australia?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-16, January.
    20. Manuel Cebral-Loureda & Enrique Tamés-Muñoz & Alberto Hernández-Baqueiro, 2022. "The Fertility of a Concept: A Bibliometric Review of Human Flourishing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-15, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:4:p:1712-:d:497315. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.