IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i3p1347-d491916.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Work Disability Contribute to Trajectories of Work Participation before and after Vocational Labour Market Training for Job Seekers?

Author

Listed:
  • Taina Leinonen

    (Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, 00032 Helsinki, Finland)

  • Eira Viikari-Juntura

    (Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, 00032 Helsinki, Finland)

  • Heikki Räisänen

    (Ministry of Economic Affairs and Employment, 00023 Helsinki, Finland)

  • Santtu Sundvall

    (Ministry of Economic Affairs and Employment, 00023 Helsinki, Finland)

  • Antti Kauhanen

    (Etla Economic Research, 00100 Helsinki, Finland)

  • Svetlana Solovieva

    (Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, 00032 Helsinki, Finland)

Abstract

The contribution of ill-health to labour market participation in relation to vocational training is unclear. Using nationally representative Finnish register data on 42,691 vocational labour market trainees in 2008–2010, we constructed latent trajectory groups of work participation in the open labour market three years before and after training, identifying groups called “High–High”, “High–Low”, “Low–High”, and “Low–Low”. We plotted further patterns of labour market participation within these trajectory groups and, using multinomial logistic regression, examined assignment to these groups focusing on previous work disability status. Those with compared to those without previous work disability had previous employment more often and spent less time in economic inactivity within the two trajectory groups with low pre-training levels of work participation. Having a previous work disability was associated with assignment to the “High–Low” trajectory group of work participation instead of the “High–High” comparison group. The associations of other background factors with the assignment to the different trajectory groups were relatively similar amongst those with and without previous work disability. However, some of these associations were weaker amongst the former. Along with other key background factors, previous work disability should be accounted for when assessing the effects of vocational training.

Suggested Citation

  • Taina Leinonen & Eira Viikari-Juntura & Heikki Räisänen & Santtu Sundvall & Antti Kauhanen & Svetlana Solovieva, 2021. "Does Work Disability Contribute to Trajectories of Work Participation before and after Vocational Labour Market Training for Job Seekers?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-17, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:3:p:1347-:d:491916
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/3/1347/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/3/1347/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rueda, S. & Chambers, L. & Wilson, M. & Mustard, C. & Rourke, S.B. & Bayoumi, A. & Raboud, J. & Lavis, J., 2012. "Association of returning to work with better health in working-aged adults: A systematic review," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 102(3), pages 541-556.
    2. David Card & Jochen Kluve & Andrea Weber, 2018. "What Works? A Meta Analysis of Recent Active Labor Market Program Evaluations," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 16(3), pages 894-931.
    3. Bruno Crépon & Gerard J. van den Berg, 2016. "Active Labor Market Policies," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 8(1), pages 521-546, October.
    4. Myung Ki & Yvonne Kelly & Amanda Sacker & James Nazroo, 2013. "Poor health, employment transitions and gender: evidence from the British Household Panel Survey," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 58(4), pages 537-546, August.
    5. Alessio Brown & Johannes Koettl, 2015. "Active labor market programs - employment gain or fiscal drain?," IZA Journal of Labor Economics, Springer;Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 4(1), pages 1-36, December.
    6. Anastasia Vlachou & Panayiota Stavroussi & Olga Roka & Evdokia Vasilou & Dimitra Papadimitriou & Chiara Scaratti & Asel Kadyrbaeva & Klemens Fheodoroff & Valentina Brecelj & Olga Svestkova & Beata Tob, 2018. "Policy Guidelines for Effective Inclusion and Reintegration of People with Chronic Diseases in the Workplace: National and European Perspectives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, March.
    7. Holm, Anders & Høgelund, Jan & Gørtz, Mette & Rasmussen, Kristin Storck & Houlberg, Helle Sofie Bøje, 2017. "Employment effects of active labor market programs for sick-listed workers," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 33-44.
    8. Melvin Vooren & Carla Haelermans & Wim Groot & Henriëtte Maassen van den Brink, 2019. "The Effectiveness Of Active Labor Market Policies: A Meta‐Analysis," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(1), pages 125-149, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Theodoropoulos, Nikolaos & Voucharas, Georgios, 2023. "Firm Closures and Labor Market Policies in Europe: Evidence from Retrospective Longitudinal Data," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1288, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    2. Sam Desiere & Bart Cockx, 2021. "How Effective Are Hiring Subsidies to Reduce Long-Term Unemployment among Prime-Aged Jobseekers? Evidence from Belgium," CESifo Working Paper Series 9325, CESifo.
    3. Goulas, Eleftherios & Zervoyianni, Athina, 2018. "Active labour-market policies and output growth: Is there a causal relationship?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 1-14.
    4. Balavac-Orlic, Merima & Posadas, Josefina, 2023. "One (program) for all or all (programs) for one: Evaluation of the employment program opportunity for all of the federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 47(1).
    5. Acevedo, Paloma & Cruces, Guillermo & Gertler, Paul & Martinez, Sebastian, 2020. "How vocational education made women better off but left men behind," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    6. Eleftherios Goulas & Athina Zervoyianni, 2017. "Government-sponsored labour-market training and output growth - cyclical, structural and globalization influences," Working Paper series 17-19, Rimini Centre for Economic Analysis.
    7. Anna Aizer & Shari Eli & Adriana Lleras-Muney & Keyoung Lee, 2020. "Do Youth Employment Programs Work? Evidence from the New Deal," NBER Working Papers 27103, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Michael C Knaus, 2022. "Double machine learning-based programme evaluation under unconfoundedness [Econometric methods for program evaluation]," The Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 25(3), pages 602-627.
    9. Avram, Silvia & Brewer, Mike & Salvatori, Andrea, 2018. "Can't work or won't work: Quasi-experimental evidence on work search requirements for single parents," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 63-85.
    10. Juan F. Jimeno, 2017. "Unemployment and the role of supranational policies," IZA World of Labor, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), pages 390-390, October.
    11. Povilas Lastauskas & Julius Stak.enas, 2024. "Labor Market Policies in High- and Low-Interest Rate Environments: Evidence from the Euro Area," Papers 2410.12024, arXiv.org.
    12. Francesco Pastore & Marco Pompili, 2020. "Assessing the Impact of Off-the-Job and On-the-Job Training on Employment Outcomes: A Counterfactual Evaluation of the PIPOL Program," Evaluation Review, , vol. 44(2-3), pages 145-184, April.
    13. Pastore, Francesco & Pompili, Marco, 2019. "Assessing the Impact of Off- and On-The-Job Training on Employment Outcomes: A Counterfactual Evaluation of the PIPOL Program," IZA Discussion Papers 12074, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    14. Lehner, Lukas & Kasy, Maximilian, 2022. "Employing the unemployed of Marienthal: Evaluation of a guaranteed job program," INET Oxford Working Papers 2022-29, Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford.
    15. Schlosser, Analia & Shanan, Yannay, 2022. "Fostering Soft Skills in Active Labor Market Programs: Evidence from a Large-Scale RCT," IZA Discussion Papers 15104, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    16. Karol Madoń & Iga Magda & Marta Palczyńska & Mateusz Smoter, 2024. "What Works for Whom? Youth Labour Market Policy in Poland," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 2, pages 1-34.
    17. Matsumoto, Kodai, 2022. "The effects of employment support programs on public assistance recipients: The case of a Japanese municipality program," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    18. David McKenzie, 2017. "How Effective Are Active Labor Market Policies in Developing Countries? A Critical Review of Recent Evidence," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 32(2), pages 127-154.
    19. Peter Mayerhofer & Julia Bachtrögler-Unger & Matthias Firgo & Oliver Fritz & Michael Klien & Philipp Piribauer & Gerhard Streicher, 2020. "Kurzanalyse ausgewählter Fördermaßnahmen Wiens in der COVID-19-Krise. Eine erste qualitative Einschätzung," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 66811, April.
    20. Caroline Hall & Inés Hardoy & Kristine Simson, 2024. "Policies for young adults with reduced work capacity. Labour market impact in Sweden and Norway," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 37(1), pages 1-33, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:3:p:1347-:d:491916. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.