IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i24p13244-d703388.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

COVID-19 Vaccine Early Skepticism, Misinformation and Informational Needs among Essential Workers in the USA

Author

Listed:
  • Elena Savoia

    (Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA
    Emergency Preparedness Research, Evaluation & Practice (EPREP) Program, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA)

  • Maxwell Su

    (Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA
    Emergency Preparedness Research, Evaluation & Practice (EPREP) Program, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA)

  • Rachael Piltch-Loeb

    (Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA
    Emergency Preparedness Research, Evaluation & Practice (EPREP) Program, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA)

  • Evelyn Masterson

    (Emergency Preparedness Research, Evaluation & Practice (EPREP) Program, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA)

  • Marcia A. Testa

    (Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA
    Emergency Preparedness Research, Evaluation & Practice (EPREP) Program, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA)

Abstract

This study presents the results of a survey of 1591 hesitant U.S. essential workers, conducted over Pollfish in December 2020 when they were the only group eligible for the vaccine, aiming to describe their concerns regarding COVID-19 vaccine safety, effectiveness and distribution policies. We computed frequencies using the SAS software for each answer, using chi-squared statistics and Cochran–Armitage trend tests to determine how informational needs differ by age, gender, level of education, race, source of COVID-19 information and levels of vaccine acceptance. The results of this study show that freedom of choice, equal access to the vaccine and being able to live a life with no restrictions once vaccinated were important concerns since the early days of the distribution campaign, with 53% (836/1591), 42% (669/1591) and 35% (559/1591) of hesitant respondents, respectively, indicating they would be more likely to receive the COVID-19 vaccine if they felt these issues were satisfactorily addressed. Early risk communication and immunization campaign strategies should address not only the reported efficacy and safety of new vaccines, but, as equally important, the population’s perceptions and beliefs regarding personal choice, effectiveness and adverse consequences.

Suggested Citation

  • Elena Savoia & Maxwell Su & Rachael Piltch-Loeb & Evelyn Masterson & Marcia A. Testa, 2021. "COVID-19 Vaccine Early Skepticism, Misinformation and Informational Needs among Essential Workers in the USA," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-16, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:24:p:13244-:d:703388
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/24/13244/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/24/13244/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brian Hughes & Cynthia Miller-Idriss & Rachael Piltch-Loeb & Beth Goldberg & Kesa White & Meili Criezis & Elena Savoia, 2021. "Development of a Codebook of Online Anti-Vaccination Rhetoric to Manage COVID-19 Vaccine Misinformation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Jamison, Amelia M. & Quinn, Sandra Crouse & Freimuth, Vicki S., 2019. "“You don't trust a government vaccine”: Narratives of institutional trust and influenza vaccination among African American and white adults," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 87-94.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sylwia Kałucka & Ewa Kusideł & Izabela Grzegorczyk-Karolak, 2022. "A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study on the Risk of Getting Sick with COVID-19, the Course of the Disease, and the Impact of the National Vaccination Program against SARS-CoV-2 on Vaccination among H," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-17, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sweet, Rachel & Kasali, Noé, 2024. "Public health intervention amidst conflict: Violence, politics, and knowledge frames in the 2018-20 Ebola epidemic in Democratic Republic of the Congo," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 350(C).
    2. Principe, Francesco & Weber, Guglielmo, 2023. "Online health information seeking and Covid-19 vaccine hesitancy: Evidence from 50+ Europeans," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    3. Ricardi S. Adnan & Sonny Harry B. Harmadi & Sudarsono Hardjosoekarto & Nur Muhammaditya, 2023. "Institutional Reconstruction of Promoting and Maintaining the Level of Compliance with Health Protocols in Indonesia during the Pandemic," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 377-406, June.
    4. Marilena Paraskeva, 2022. "The Covid-19 Anti-vaccination Movement in Cyprus: an investigation of its discourses (AMID)," GreeSE – Hellenic Observatory Papers on Greece and Southeast Europe 179, Hellenic Observatory, LSE.
    5. Jian Cao & Christina M. Ramirez & R. Michael Alvarez, 2022. "The politics of vaccine hesitancy in the United States," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 103(1), pages 42-54, January.
    6. Choi, Yongjin & Fox, Ashley M., 2022. "Mistrust in public health institutions is a stronger predictor of vaccine hesitancy and uptake than Trust in Trump," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    7. Samuel Stroope & Rhiannon A. Kroeger & Courtney E. Williams & Joseph O. Baker, 2021. "Sociodemographic correlates of vaccine hesitancy in the United States and the mediating role of beliefs about governmental conspiracies," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(6), pages 2472-2481, November.
    8. Hornsey, Matthew J. & Lobera, Josep & Díaz-Catalán, Celia, 2020. "Vaccine hesitancy is strongly associated with distrust of conventional medicine, and only weakly associated with trust in alternative medicine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    9. Ramey Moore & Don E. Willis & Sumit K. Shah & Rachel S. Purvis & Xochitl Shields & Pearl A. McElfish, 2021. "“The Risk Seems Too High”: Thoughts and Feelings about COVID-19 Vaccination," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-9, August.
    10. Brian Hughes & Kesa White & Jennifer West & Meili Criezis & Cindy Zhou & Sarah Bartholomew, 2021. "Cultural Variance in Reception and Interpretation of Social Media COVID-19 Disinformation in French-Speaking Regions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-28, November.
    11. Athias, Laure & Macina, Moudo, 2022. "Demand for vaccination in Sub-Saharan Africa: The vertical legacy of the slave trade," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    12. Lahijani, Ariana Y. & King, Adrian R. & Gullatte, Mary M. & Hennink, Monique & Bednarczyk, Robert A., 2021. "HPV Vaccine Promotion: The church as an agent of change," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    13. Attwell, Katie & Turvey, Jake & Wood, Lisa, 2024. "COVID-19 vaccination of at-risk and marginalised groups: recentering the state in vaccine uptake," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
    14. Van Oost, Pascaline & Yzerbyt, Vincent & Schmitz, Mathias & Vansteenkiste, Maarten & Luminet, Olivier & Morbée, Sofie & Van den Bergh, Omer & Waterschoot, Joachim & Klein, Olivier, 2022. "The relation between conspiracism, government trust, and COVID-19 vaccination intentions: The key role of motivation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:24:p:13244-:d:703388. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.