IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i23p12657-d692522.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Stigma Surrounding Type 2 Diabetes in Colombia

Author

Listed:
  • Victor Pedrero

    (Nursing Faculty, Universidad Andrés Bello, Santiago 8370146, Chile
    School of Psychology, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 7820436, Chile)

  • Jorge Manzi

    (School of Psychology, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 7820436, Chile)

  • Luz Marina Alonso

    (Department of Public Health, Universidad del Norte, Barranquilla 081007, Colombia)

Abstract

Type 2 diabetes is a global epidemic, and many people feel stigmatized for having this disease. The stigma is a relevant barrier to diabetes management. However, evidence in this regard is scarce in Latin America. This study aimed to analyze the level of stigma surrounding type 2 diabetes in the Colombian population and its relationships with sociodemographic, clinical, psychosocial variables and behaviors related to management of the disease (self-management behaviors). This cross-sectional study included 501 Colombian adults with type 2 diabetes. We estimated the relation between stigma and selected variables through linear regression models. Additionally, we analyzed the mediator role of psychosocial variables in the relationship between stigma and self-management behaviors through structural equation models. A total of 16.4% of patients showed concerning levels of stigma. The time elapsed since diagnosis (β = −0.23) and socioeconomic status (β = −0.13) were significant predictors of the level of stigma. Stigma was negatively correlated with self-efficacy (β = −0.36), self-esteem (β = −0.37), and relationship with health care provider (β = −0.46), and positively correlated with stress (β = 0.23). Self-efficacy, self-esteem, and the relationships with health care providers had a mediation role in the relationship between stigma and self-management behaviors. These variables would be part of the mechanisms through which the perception of stigma harms self-management behaviors. The stigma of type 2 diabetes is frequent in the Colombian population and negatively associated with important aspects of disease management.

Suggested Citation

  • Victor Pedrero & Jorge Manzi & Luz Marina Alonso, 2021. "A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Stigma Surrounding Type 2 Diabetes in Colombia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-16, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:23:p:12657-:d:692522
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/23/12657/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/23/12657/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Demakakos, Panayotes & Nazroo, James & Breeze, Elizabeth & Marmot, Michael, 2008. "Socioeconomic status and health: The role of subjective social status," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 330-340, July.
    2. Jasmin Schabert & Jessica Browne & Kylie Mosely & Jane Speight, 2013. "Social Stigma in Diabetes," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 6(1), pages 1-10, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaobao Li & Houchao Lyu, 2022. "Social Status and Subjective Well-Being in Chinese Adults: Mediating Effect of Future Time Perspective," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 17(4), pages 2101-2116, August.
    2. Nobles, Jenna & Weintraub, Miranda Ritterman & Adler, Nancy E., 2013. "Subjective socioeconomic status and health: Relationships reconsidered," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 58-66.
    3. Coustaury, Camille & Jeannot, Elias & Moreau, Adele & Nietge, Clotilde & Maharani, Asri & Richards, Lindsay & Präg, Patrick, 2023. "Subjective socioeconomic status and self-rated health in the English Longitudinal Study of Aging: A fixed-effects analysis☆☆We thank the anonymous reviewers of Social Science & Medicine for their help," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    4. Bradshaw, Matt & Ellison, Christopher G., 2010. "Financial hardship and psychological distress: Exploring the buffering effects of religion," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(1), pages 196-204, July.
    5. Jerneja Farkas & Majda Pahor & Lijana Zaletel-Kragelj, 2011. "Self-rated health in different social classes of Slovenian adult population: nationwide cross-sectional study," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 56(1), pages 45-54, February.
    6. Adena, Maja & Myck, Michal, 2013. "Poverty and Transitions in Health," IZA Discussion Papers 7532, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    7. Alaina N. English & Jennifer A. Bellingtier & Shevaun D. Neupert, 2019. "It’s “the Joneses”: the influence of objective and subjective socioeconomic status on subjective perceptions of aging," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 121-128, March.
    8. Garbarski, Dana, 2010. "Perceived social position and health: Is there a reciprocal relationship?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(5), pages 692-699, March.
    9. Fleuriet, K. Jill & Sunil, T.S., 2015. "Reproductive habitus, psychosocial health, and birth weight variation in Mexican immigrant and Mexican American women in south Texas," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 102-109.
    10. Danzer, Alexander M. & Dietz, Barbara & Gatskova, Ksenia & Schmillen, Achim, 2014. "Showing off to the new neighbors? Income, socioeconomic status and consumption patterns of internal migrants," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 230-245.
    11. Kiyotaka Nemoto & Hiroki Oka & Hiroki Fukuda & Yoshinori Yamakawa, 2017. "MRI-based Brain Healthcare Quotients: A bridge between neural and behavioral analyses for keeping the brain healthy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-13, October.
    12. Rosenfield, Sarah, 2012. "Triple jeopardy? Mental health at the intersection of gender, race, and class," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(11), pages 1791-1801.
    13. Ruby Yu & Cecilia Tong & Jason Leung & Jean Woo, 2020. "Socioeconomic Inequalities in Frailty in Hong Kong, China: A 14-Year Longitudinal Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-16, February.
    14. Michela Luciani & Lorenzo Montali & Gabriella Nicolò & Diletta Fabrizi & Stefania Di Mauro & Davide Ausili, 2021. "Self-care is Renouncement, Routine, and Control: The Experience of Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 30(6), pages 892-900, July.
    15. Johanna Cresswell-Smith & Kristian Wahlbeck & Jorid Kalseth, 2022. "Life Conditions as Mediators of Welfare State Effect on Mental Wellbeing among Oldest Old in Europe," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-19, April.
    16. Jennifer Whillans & James Nazroo & Katey Matthews, 2016. "Trajectories of vision in older people: the role of age and social position," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 171-184, June.
    17. Jens Hoebel & Ulrike E Maske & Hajo Zeeb & Thomas Lampert, 2017. "Social Inequalities and Depressive Symptoms in Adults: The Role of Objective and Subjective Socioeconomic Status," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, January.
    18. Justin A. Haegele & Steven K. Holland & Eddie Hill, 2022. "Understanding Parents’ Experiences with Children with Type 1 Diabetes: A Qualitative Inquiry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-10, January.
    19. West, Patrick & Sweeting, Helen & Young, Robert & Kelly, Shona, 2010. "The relative importance of family socioeconomic status and school-based peer hierarchies for morning cortisol in youth: An exporatory study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(8), pages 1246-1253, April.
    20. Emma Zang & Anthony R. Bardo, 2019. "Objective and Subjective Socioeconomic Status, Their Discrepancy, and Health: Evidence from East Asia," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 143(2), pages 765-794, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:23:p:12657-:d:692522. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.