IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i20p10918-d658405.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender Self-Perception and Psychological Distress in Healthcare Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Beatriz Rodríguez-Roca

    (Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain)

  • Ana Belén Subirón-Valera

    (Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain)

  • Ángel Gasch-Gallén

    (Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain)

  • Estela Calatayud

    (Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain)

  • Isabel Gómez-Soria

    (Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain)

  • Yolanda Marcén-Román

    (Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
    Institute for Health Research Aragón, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyze university Health Sciences students’ self-perception regarding gender stereotypes, and to explore whether there was any association between gender stereotypes and clinical/socio-demographic variables. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted with a sample of 252 university students who completed a self-administrated online questionnaire (18.3% males, 81.7% females). We evaluated the self-perception of gender stereotypes as determined using the BSRI-12 questionnaire and explored the association of this measure with the impact of perceived stress measured using a modified scale (PSS-10-C) as well as anxiety and depression according to scores on the Goldberg scale (GADS). Results: According to the students’ self-perception of gender stereotypes, 24.9% self-perceived themselves as feminine, 20.1% as masculine, 24.9% as androgynous, and 30% as undifferentiated. The degree determines self-identification with gender stereotypes. Nursing and Occupational Therapy are studied mostly by women, 28.4% and 45%, respectively, while Physiotherapy is studied mainly by men (71.2%). Females indicated more anxiety (75.7%) and depression (81.7%) than males (52.9% and 67.3%, respectively). In contrast, males developed more stress (88.5%) than females (74.1%). Conclusions: University degree, anxiety, depression, and stress determined self-identification with gender stereotypes. The results of this study indicate that gender roles influence the possibility of developing mental disorders and should be taken into account in future studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Beatriz Rodríguez-Roca & Ana Belén Subirón-Valera & Ángel Gasch-Gallén & Estela Calatayud & Isabel Gómez-Soria & Yolanda Marcén-Román, 2021. "Gender Self-Perception and Psychological Distress in Healthcare Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-11, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:20:p:10918-:d:658405
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/20/10918/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/20/10918/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Pilar Matud & Marisela López-Curbelo & Demelza Fortes, 2019. "Gender and Psychological Well-Being," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-11, September.
    2. Badr K. Aldhmadi & Rakesh Kumar & Ramaiah Itumalla & Bilesha Perera, 2021. "Depressive Symptomatology and Practice of Safety Measures among Undergraduate Students during COVID-19: Impact of Gender," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-9, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Julio Torales & Iván Barrios & Osvaldo Melgarejo & Noelia Ruiz Díaz & Marcelo O’Higgins & Rodrigo Navarro & Diego Amarilla & José Almirón-Santacruz & Israel González-Urbieta & Tomás Caycho-Rod, 2024. "Hope, resilience and subjective happiness among general population of Paraguay in the post COVID-19 pandemic," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 70(3), pages 489-497, May.
    2. M. Pilar Matud & Juan Manuel Bethencourt & Ignacio Ibáñez & Demelza Fortes & Amelia Díaz, 2022. "Gender Differences in Psychological Well-Being in Emerging Adulthood," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 17(2), pages 1001-1017, April.
    3. Jian Li & Eryong Xue & Biyun Liu & Qing Han, 2024. "Impact of COVID-19 on the psychological and behavioral health of college students worldwide: a knowledge mapping approach," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Leanna M. Closson & Alicia M. McVarnock & Laura E. Cook, 2022. "Is there an Upside to Social Withdrawal? Considering Well-Being among Socially Withdrawn Emerging Adults," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 17(5), pages 3131-3149, October.
    5. Junko Okuyama & Shin-Ichi Izumi & Shunichi Funakoshi & Shuji Seto & Hiroyuki Sasaki & Kiyoshi Ito & Fumihiko Imamura & Mayumi Willgerodt & Yu Fukuda, 2022. "Supporting adolescents’ mental health during COVID-19 by utilising lessons from the aftermath of the Great East Japan Earthquake," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-13, December.
    6. Sunhee Kim & Seoyong Kim, 2021. "Who Is Suffering from the “Corona Blues”? An Analysis of the Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Depression and Its Implications for Health Policy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-21, November.
    7. Jinjing Ma & Min Lei & Huan Yu & Rui Li, 2023. "A Study on Temporal and Spatial Differences in Women’s Well-Being in an Ecologically Vulnerable Area in Northwest China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-24, January.
    8. Theodoros Kyriazos & Mary Poga, 2024. "Planfulness in Psychological Well-being: Mediating Roles of Self-Efficacy and Presence of Meaning in Life," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 19(4), pages 1927-1950, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:20:p:10918-:d:658405. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.