IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i20p10650-d653825.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Obstetricians’ Attitude towards Childbirth

Author

Listed:
  • Ernesto González-Mesa

    (Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, School of Medicine, University of Malaga, 29071 Malaga, Spain
    Grupo IBIMA de Investigación en Medicina Maternofetal, Epigenética, Enfermedades de la Mujer y Salud Reproductiva, IBIMA, 29071 Malaga, Spain
    Hospital Regional Universitario SSPA de Malaga, 29010 Malaga, Spain)

  • Jesús Jiménez-López

    (Grupo IBIMA de Investigación en Medicina Maternofetal, Epigenética, Enfermedades de la Mujer y Salud Reproductiva, IBIMA, 29071 Malaga, Spain
    Hospital Regional Universitario SSPA de Malaga, 29010 Malaga, Spain)

  • Marta Blasco-Alonso

    (Grupo IBIMA de Investigación en Medicina Maternofetal, Epigenética, Enfermedades de la Mujer y Salud Reproductiva, IBIMA, 29071 Malaga, Spain
    Hospital Regional Universitario SSPA de Malaga, 29010 Malaga, Spain)

  • Daniel Lubián-López

    (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Jerez de La Frontera, 11007 Cadiz, Spain
    Obstetric and Gynecology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Quirónsalud Campo de Gibraltar, University of Cadiz, 11007 Cadiz, Spain)

Abstract

(1) Background: In Spain, as in other countries, there is an increase in policies and practices focused on the humanization of perinatal care. In this regard, the quality of interpersonal interactions between women and health professionals is one of the main factors, and, apart from other factors, it is influenced by health professionals´ attitudes towards childbirth. The main objective of this study was to determine the attitudes of obstetricians towards the humanization of childbirth and the promotion of a positive childbirth experience. (2) Methods: The psychosocial task force of the Spanish Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology designed a nationwide online survey. The questionnaire on attitudes towards childbirth (CAVE, acronym for “cuestionario de actitudes sobre vivencias y experiencias en el parto”) was used for the assessment. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of the scale were also performed. (3) Results: A total of 384 participants completed the survey. Obstetricians showed a high-quality clinical obstetric performance, but some difficulties in identifying birth-related psychological-trauma risk factors. Some differences according to practice and gender were found in the final score and in areas regarding psychosocial risk, pain, accompaniment, and women´s expectations. (4) Conclusions: In light of the results, it is advisable to launch education initiatives aimed to improve interaction with pregnant women.

Suggested Citation

  • Ernesto González-Mesa & Jesús Jiménez-López & Marta Blasco-Alonso & Daniel Lubián-López, 2021. "Obstetricians’ Attitude towards Childbirth," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-11, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:20:p:10650-:d:653825
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/20/10650/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/20/10650/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Werner, Anne & Malterud, Kirsti, 2003. "It is hard work behaving as a credible patient: encounters between women with chronic pain and their doctors," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 57(8), pages 1409-1419, October.
    2. Anna Martín-Arribas & Rafael Vila-Candel & Rhona O’Connell & Martina Dillon & Inmaculada Vila-Bellido & M. Ángeles Beneyto & Inmaculada De Molina-Fernández & Nerea Rodríguez-Conesa & Cristina González, 2020. "Transfers of Care between Healthcare Professionals in Obstetric Units of Different Sizes across Spain and in a Hospital in Ireland: The MidconBirth Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-15, November.
    3. Marianna Mazza & Emanuele Caroppo & Giuseppe Marano & Daniela Chieffo & Lorenzo Moccia & Delfina Janiri & Lucio Rinaldi & Luigi Janiri & Gabriele Sani, 2021. "Caring for Mothers: A Narrative Review on Interpersonal Violence and Peripartum Mental Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-13, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hua Li, 2022. "Affective Instability, Depression, and Anxiety Symptoms in a Community Sample of Pregnant and Postpartum Women: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-13, March.
    2. Melander, Stina, 2023. "Different logics of pain: the gendered dimension of chronic pain in a relational setting," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 335(C).
    3. Emily D. Heaphy, 2013. "Repairing Breaches with Rules: Maintaining Institutions in the Face of Everyday Disruptions," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(5), pages 1291-1315, October.
    4. Wamsiedel, Marius, 2020. "Credibility work and moral evaluation at the ED," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    5. Santer, Miriam & Wyke, Sally & Warner, Pam, 2008. "Women's management of menstrual symptoms: Findings from a postal survey and qualitative interviews," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(2), pages 276-288, January.
    6. Hicks, Alison, 2022. "The missing link: Towards an integrated health and information literacy research agenda," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    7. Malat, Jennifer R. & van Ryn, Michelle & Purcell, David, 2006. "Race, socioeconomic status, and the perceived importance of positive self-presentation in health care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(10), pages 2479-2488, May.
    8. Dumit, Joseph, 2006. "Illnesses you have to fight to get: Facts as forces in uncertain, emergent illnesses," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 577-590, February.
    9. Maria Wiklund & Ann Öhman & Carita Bengs & Eva-Britt Malmgren-Olsson, 2014. "Living Close to the Edge," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(2), pages 21582440145, May.
    10. Ida Björkman & Magnus Simrén & Gisela Ringström & Eva Jakobsson Ung, 2016. "Patients’ experiences of healthcare encounters in severe irritable bowel syndrome: an analysis based on narrative and feminist theory," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(19-20), pages 2967-2978, October.
    11. Koekkoek, B. & Hutschemaekers, G. & van Meijel, B. & Schene, A., 2011. "How do patients come to be seen as 'difficult'?: A mixed-methods study in community mental health care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(4), pages 504-512, February.
    12. Jaworska, Sylvia & Ryan, Kath, 2018. "Gender and the language of pain in chronic and terminal illness: A corpus-based discourse analysis of patients' narratives," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 107-114.
    13. Parizot, Isabelle & Chauvin, Pierre & Paugam, Serge, 2005. "The moral career of poor patients in free clinics," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(6), pages 1369-1380, September.
    14. Pryma, Jane, 2017. "“Even my sister says I'm acting like a crazy to get a check”: Race, gender, and moral boundary-work in women's claims of disabling chronic pain," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 66-73.
    15. Kristin Margrethe Heggen & Henrik Berg, 2021. "Epistemic injustice in the age of evidence-based practice: The case of fibromyalgia," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-6, December.
    16. Rasmussen, Erik Børve, 2020. "Rhetorical work and medical authority: Constructing convincing cases in insurance medicine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    17. Alexandra Fernandes & Lotte-Lise Skotnes & Maria Major & Pedro Fontes Falcão, 2020. "Clinicians’ Perceptions of Norwegian Women’s Experiences of Infertility Diseases," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-12, February.
    18. Sim, Julius & Madden, Sue, 2008. "Illness experience in fibromyalgia syndrome: A metasynthesis of qualitative studies," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 57-67, July.
    19. Magaly Nóblega & Olenka Retiz & Juan Nuñez del Prado & Ramón Bartra, 2024. "Maternal Stress Mediates Association of Infant Socioemotional Development with Perinatal Mental Health in Socioeconomically Vulnerable Peruvian Settings," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(7), pages 1-13, June.
    20. Marilène Vuille & Maryline Foerster & Eliane Foucault & Olivier Hugli, 2018. "Pain assessment by emergency nurses at triage in the emergency department: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3-4), pages 669-676, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:20:p:10650-:d:653825. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.