IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i17p8908-d620944.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implementation of the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Smoke-Free Rule: A Socio-Ecological Qualitative Assessment of Administrator and Resident Perceptions

Author

Listed:
  • Kimberly Horn

    (Department of Population Health Sciences, Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, Riverside Circle, Roanoke, VA 24016, USA)

  • Sallie Beth Johnson

    (Department of Public Health and Healthcare Leadership, Radford University Carilion, 101 Elm Avenue, SE, Roanoke, VA 24013, USA)

  • Sofía Rincón-Gallardo Patiño

    (Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24060, USA)

  • Kevin Krost

    (Department of Leadership, Counseling, and Research, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24060, USA)

  • Tiffany Gray

    (Department of Epidemiology, The Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, 905 New Hampshire Avenue, Northwest, Washington, DC 20052, USA)

  • Craig Dearfield

    (Department of Epidemiology, The Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, 905 New Hampshire Avenue, Northwest, Washington, DC 20052, USA)

  • Chenguang Du

    (Department of Leadership, Counseling, and Research, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24060, USA)

  • Debra Bernat

    (Department of Epidemiology, The Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, 905 New Hampshire Avenue, Northwest, Washington, DC 20052, USA)

Abstract

In July 2018, the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) implemented a mandatory smoke-free rule in public housing. This study assessed administrator and resident perceptions of rule implementation during its initial year in the District of Columbia Housing Authority (DCHA). Assessment included nine focus groups ( n = 69) with residents and in-depth interviews with administrators ( n = 7) and residents ( n = 26) from 14 DCHA communities (family = 7 and senior/disabled = 7). Semi-structured discussion guides based on the multi-level socio-ecological framework captured dialogue that was recorded, transcribed verbatim, and coded inductively. Emerging major themes for each socio-ecological framework level included: (1) Individual: the rule was supported due to perceived health benefits, with stronger support among non-smokers; (2) Interpersonal: limiting secondhand smoke exposure was perceived as a positive for vulnerable residents; (3) Organizational: communication, signage, and cessation support was perceived as a need; (4) Community: residents perceived mobility, disability, weather, and safety-related issues as barriers; and (5) Public Policy: lease amendments were perceived as enablers of rule implementation but expressed confusion about violations and enforcement. A majority of administrators and residents reported favorable implications of the mandated HUD rule. The novel application of a socio-ecological framework, however, detected implementation nuances that required improvements on multiple levels, including more signage, cessation support, clarification of enforcement roles, and addressing safety concerns.

Suggested Citation

  • Kimberly Horn & Sallie Beth Johnson & Sofía Rincón-Gallardo Patiño & Kevin Krost & Tiffany Gray & Craig Dearfield & Chenguang Du & Debra Bernat, 2021. "Implementation of the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Smoke-Free Rule: A Socio-Ecological Qualitative Assessment of Administrator and Resident Perceptions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-16, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:17:p:8908-:d:620944
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/17/8908/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/17/8908/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Licht, A.S. & King, B.A. & Travers, M.J. & Rivard, C. & Hyland, A.J., 2012. "Attitudes, experiences, and acceptance of smoke-free policies among US multiunit housing residents," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 102(10), pages 1868-1871.
    2. Nan Jiang & Lorna Thorpe & Sue Kaplan & Donna Shelley, 2018. "Perceptions about the Federally Mandated Smoke-Free Housing Policy among Residents Living in Public Housing in New York City," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-8, September.
    3. Bauer, J.E. & Hyland, A. & Li, Q. & Steger, C. & Cummings, K.M., 2005. "A longitudinal assessment of the impact of smoke-free worksite policies on tobacco use," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 95(6), pages 1024-1029.
    4. Anne Lindsay & Anita Hubley, 2006. "Conceptual Reconstruction through a Modified Focus Group Methodology," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 79(3), pages 437-454, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Craig T. Dearfield & Margaret Ulfers & Kimberly Horn & Debra H. Bernat, 2024. "Resident Support for the Federally Mandated Smoke-Free Rule in Public Housing: 2018–2022," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(1), pages 1-8, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chau Quy Ngo & Phuong Thu Phan & Giap Van Vu & Hanh Thi Chu & Toan Thi Nguyen & Mai Hong Nguyen & Hai Thanh Phan & Benjamin M. Y. Ong & Giang Thu Vu & Kiet Tuan Huy Pham & Bach Xuan Tran & Carl A. Lat, 2019. "Prevalence and Sources of Second-Hand Smoking Exposure among Non-Smoking Pregnant Women in an Urban Setting of Vietnam," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Havelka, Douglas & Merhout, Jeffrey W., 2013. "Internal information technology audit process quality: Theory development using structured group processes," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 165-192.
    3. Joshua Miller & Maya Vijayaraghavan, 2022. "Tobacco Industry Efforts to Respond to Smoke-Free Policies in Multi-Unit Housing: An Evaluation of Tobacco Industry Documents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-10, March.
    4. Matthew Taing & Bryce Kyburz & Isabel Martinez Leal & Kathy Le & Tzu-An Chen & Virmarie Correa-Fernandez & Teresa Williams & Daniel P. O’Connor & Ezemenari M. Obasi & Kathleen Casey & Litty Koshy & Lo, 2020. "Clinician Training in the Adaptation of a Comprehensive Tobacco-Free Workplace Program in Agencies Serving the Homeless and Vulnerably Housed," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-15, August.
    5. Nan Jiang & Mariaelena Gonzalez & Pamela M. Ling & Kelly C. Young-Wolff & Stanton A. Glantz, 2017. "Smoke-Free Laws and Hazardous Drinking: A Cross-Sectional Study among U.S. Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-11, April.
    6. Boram Lee & Vicki Fung & David Cheng & Jonathan P. Winickoff & Nancy A. Rigotti & Radhika Shah & Claire McGlave & Sydney Goldberg & Glory Song & Jacqueline Doane & Melody Kingsley & Patricia Henley & , 2022. "Implementation Activities in Smoke-Free Public Housing: The Massachusetts Experience," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-12, December.
    7. Elena VACULOVSCHI, 2023. "Methodological Aspects And Results Of Conducting Focus Group Interviews In The Study Of The Opinion Of Children Left Behind By Labor Migration," Eastern European Journal for Regional Studies (EEJRS), Center for Studies in European Integration (CSEI), Academy of Economic Studies of Moldova (ASEM), vol. 9(1), pages 60-69, June.
    8. Kerry Anne McGeary & Dhaval Dave & Brandy Lipton & Timothy Roeper, 2020. "Impact of Comprehensive Smoking Bans on the Health of Infants and Children," American Journal of Health Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 6(1), pages 1-38.
    9. Silvia Tiezzi, 2009. "The Economic Impact of Clean Indoor Air Laws: A Review of Alternative Approaches and of Empirical findings," Department of Economics University of Siena 570, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    10. Jeannette Rüge & Anja Broda & Sabina Ulbricht & Gudrun Klein & Hans-Jürgen Rumpf & Ulrich John & Christian Meyer, 2010. "Workplace smoking restrictions: smoking behavior and the intention to change among continuing smokers," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 55(6), pages 599-608, December.
    11. Pieroni, Luca & Chiavarini, Manuela & Minelli, Liliana & Salmasi, Luca, 2013. "The role of anti-smoking legislation on cigarette and alcohol consumption habits in Italy," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 116-126.
    12. Edward Sutanto & Danielle M. Smith & Connor Miller & Richard J. O’Connor & Andrew Hyland & Takahiro Tabuchi & Anne C. K. Quah & K. Michael Cummings & Steve Xu & Geoffrey T. Fong & Janine Ouimet & Itsu, 2019. "Use of Heated Tobacco Products within Indoor Spaces: Findings from the 2018 ITC Japan Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-8, December.
    13. Ann Marie Dale & Diane S. Rohlman & Lisa Hayibor & Bradley A. Evanoff, 2021. "Work Organization Factors Associated with Health and Work Outcomes among Apprentice Construction Workers: Comparison between the Residential and Commercial Sectors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-13, August.
    14. Darden, Michael E. & Hotchkiss, Julie L. & Melinda Pitts, M., 2021. "The dynamics of the smoking wage penalty," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    15. Nan Jiang & Emily Gill & Lorna E. Thorpe & Erin S. Rogers & Cora de Leon & Elle Anastasiou & Sue A. Kaplan & Donna Shelley, 2021. "Implementing the Federal Smoke-Free Public Housing Policy in New York City: Understanding Challenges and Opportunities for Improving Policy Impact," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-13, November.
    16. Corinne Reczek & Hui Liu & Dustin Brown, 2014. "Cigarette Smoking in Same-Sex and Different-Sex Unions: The Role of Socioeconomic and Psychological Factors," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 33(4), pages 527-551, August.
    17. Luca Pieroni & Giacomo Muzi & Augusto Quercia & Donatella Lanari & Carmen Rundo & Liliana Minelli & Luca Salmasi & Marco Dell'Omo, 2015. "Estimating the Smoking Ban Effects on Smoking Prevalence, Quitting and Cigarette Consumption in a Population Study of Apprentices in Italy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-13, August.
    18. Cassidy R. LoParco & Tzuan A. Chen & Isabel Martinez Leal & Maggie Britton & Brian J. Carter & Virmarie Correa-Fernández & Bryce Kyburz & Teresa Williams & Kathleen Casey & Anastasia Rogova & Hsien-Ch, 2022. "Organization-Level Factors Associated with Changes in the Delivery of the Five A’s for Smoking Cessation following the Implementation of a Comprehensive Tobacco-Free Workplace Program within Substance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-13, September.
    19. Achim Goerres & Katrin Prinzen, 2012. "Can We Improve the Measurement of Attitudes Towards the Welfare State? A Constructive Critique of Survey Instruments with Evidence from Focus Groups," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 109(3), pages 515-534, December.
    20. Ellen Childs & Alan C. Geller & Daniel R. Brooks & Jessica Davine & John Kane & Robyn Keske & Jodi Anthony & Vaughan W. Rees, 2022. "Assessing Smoke-Free Housing Implementation Approaches to Inform Best Practices: A National Survey of Early-Adopting Public Housing Authorities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-15, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:17:p:8908-:d:620944. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.