IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i16p8628-d614890.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Mediated Role of Credibility on Information Sources and Patient Awareness toward Patient Rights

Author

Listed:
  • Osnat Roth-Cohen

    (School of Communication, Ariel University, Science Park, POB 3, Ariel 40700, Israel)

  • Shalom Levy

    (Department of Economics and Business Administration, Ariel University, Science Park, POB 3, Ariel 40700, Israel)

  • Avi Zigdon

    (Department of Health Systems Management, School of Health Systems, Ariel University, Science Park, POB 3, Ariel 40700, Israel)

Abstract

Although patient rights are an important issue, this remains an understudied research area. Patients are unaware of their rights, lacking control of health care treatments they might deserve. This can contribute to sustaining inequality as well as failure in achieving welfare policy goals. Drawing on channel complementarity theory, the current study explored patients’ awareness toward their rights, and the credibility of information sources related to patient rights. In a web-based survey, 994 Israeli participants, suffering from chronic illness and using health services, were recruited. To examine the study’s theoretical framework and relationships among the constructs and test the hypotheses, a path analysis was conducted using Structural Equation Modeling. The research model depicts direct and indirect relationships between constructs, and the relevant coefficients. The results show a direct and positive interaction between information credibility and patient rights awareness (β = 0.10, p = 0.019). Information credibility partially mediates the relationship between public service information sources and patient rights awareness (bootstrap with 95% CI: 0.01–0.07; p = 0.015). The mass media information sources construct is directly and positively related to information credibility (β = 0.36, p = 0.000). Age was found as a moderator, indicating that information credibility is a factor only at lower ages. Therefore, patient rights should be systematically and reliably accessible in order to raise the awareness and trust of chronic patients regarding information about patient rights. Using planned health communication campaigns mainly via public service sources that are perceived as trustworthy can help contribute to approach patients more effectively and provide them with accessible and detailed information about their rights.

Suggested Citation

  • Osnat Roth-Cohen & Shalom Levy & Avi Zigdon, 2021. "The Mediated Role of Credibility on Information Sources and Patient Awareness toward Patient Rights," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-15, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:16:p:8628-:d:614890
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/16/8628/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/16/8628/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wonchan Choi & Besiki Stvilia, 2015. "Web credibility assessment: Conceptualization, operationalization, variability, and models," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 66(12), pages 2399-2414, December.
    2. Yan Zhang, 2014. "Beyond quality and accessibility: Source selection in consumer health information searching," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 65(5), pages 911-927, May.
    3. John Dimmick & Yan Chen & Zhan Li, 2004. "Competition Between the Internet and Traditional News Media: The Gratification-Opportunities Niche Dimension," Journal of Media Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 19-33.
    4. Julie Janssens & Natascha Van Mechelen, 2017. "Who is to Blame? An Overview of the Factors Contributing to the Non-Take-Up of Social Rights," Working Papers 1708, Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp.
    5. Wonchan Choi, 2020. "Older adultsʼ credibility assessment of online health information: An exploratory study using an extended typology of web credibility," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(11), pages 1295-1307, November.
    6. Volker Gehrau & Sam Fujarski & Hannah Lorenz & Carla Schieb & Bernd Blöbaum, 2021. "The Impact of Health Information Exposure and Source Credibility on COVID-19 Vaccination Intention in Germany," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-12, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ha Trong Nguyen & Huong Thu Le & Luke B Connelly, 2021. "Who's declining the “free lunch”? New evidence from the uptake of public child dental benefits," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(2), pages 270-288, February.
    2. Soledad García-García & Raquel Rodríguez-Díaz, 2023. "Official Information on Twitter during the Pandemic in Spain," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, April.
    3. Guangbin Wang & Yingxia Xue & Mirosław Jan Skibniewski & Jiule Song & Hao Lu, 2018. "Analysis of Private Investors Conduct Strategies by Governments Supervising Public-Private Partnership Projects in the New Media Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-26, December.
    4. Jarosław Drobnik & Robert Susło & Piotr Pobrotyn & Ewa Fabich & Violetta Magiera & Dorota Diakowska & Izabella Uchmanowicz, 2021. "COVID-19 among Healthcare Workers in the University Clinical Hospital in Wroclaw, Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-13, May.
    5. Munoz de Bustillo Llorente Rafael & FERNANDEZ MACIAS Enrique & GONZALEZ VAZQUEZ Ignacio, 2020. "Universality in Social Protection: An Inquiry about its Meaning and Measurement," JRC Research Reports JRC122953, Joint Research Centre.
    6. Catarina Sismeiro & Ammara Mahmood, 2018. "Competitive vs. Complementary Effects in Online Social Networks and News Consumption: A Natural Experiment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(11), pages 5014-5037, November.
    7. Julie Vinck & Jo Lebeer & Wim Van Lancker, 2018. "Non-take up of the supplemental child benefit for children with a disability in Belgium: a mixed-method approach," Working Papers 1806, Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp.
    8. Sung, Nakil & Kwack, Eunkyoung, 2016. "IPTV's videos on demand for television programs, their usage patterns, and inter-channel relationship in Korea," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(10), pages 1064-1076.
    9. Yu Chi & Daqing He & Wei Jeng, 2020. "Laypeople's source selection in online health information‐seeking process," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(12), pages 1484-1499, December.
    10. Daniel K. Maduku & Emad A. Abu-Shanab, 2022. "Drivers of Social Media Networking Site Continuance Intention in Jordan and South Africa: Do National Cultural Differences Matter?," International Journal of E-Services and Mobile Applications (IJESMA), IGI Global, vol. 14(1), pages 1-29, January.
    11. Kane J. Smith & Gurpreet Dhillon & Brigid A. Otoo, 2022. "iGen User (over) Attachment to Social Media: Reframing the Policy Intervention Conversation," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 1989-2006, December.
    12. Xiaodong Yang & Lai Wei & Zhiyue Liu, 2022. "Promoting COVID-19 Vaccination Using the Health Belief Model: Does Information Acquisition from Divergent Sources Make a Difference?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-15, March.
    13. Wonchan Choi, 2020. "Older adultsʼ credibility assessment of online health information: An exploratory study using an extended typology of web credibility," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(11), pages 1295-1307, November.
    14. Sung, Nakil & Kim, Jaekyeong, 2020. "Does the internet kill newspapers? The case of South Korea," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(4).
    15. Shaobo Liang & Dan Wu & Jing Dong, 2022. "Understanding the Paths and Patterns of App-Switching Experiences in Mobile Searches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-19, October.
    16. Li, Shu-Chu & Chen, Yen-Shen & Ku, Linlin, 2017. "A Niche Analysis of Three Interpersonal Communication Technologies: Examining the Competition among Facebook, Line, and Email," 14th ITS Asia-Pacific Regional Conference, Kyoto 2017: Mapping ICT into Transformation for the Next Information Society 168514, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    17. Lin, Wan-Ying & Zhang, Xinzhi & Jung, Joo-Young & Kim, Yong-Chan, 2013. "From the wired to wireless generation? Investigating teens’ Internet use through the mobile phone," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 651-661.
    18. Chen, Yi-Ning Katherine, 2017. "Competitions among OTT TV Platforms and Traditional Television in Taiwan: A Niche Analysis," 14th ITS Asia-Pacific Regional Conference, Kyoto 2017: Mapping ICT into Transformation for the Next Information Society 168477, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    19. Ruoheng Liu & Yi-Hui Christine Huang & Jie Sun & Jennifer Lau & Qinxian Cai, 2022. "A Shot in the Arm for Vaccination Intention: The Media and the Health Belief Model in Three Chinese Societies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-17, March.
    20. Vicente Javier Clemente-Suárez & Eduardo Navarro-Jiménez & Juan Antonio Simón-Sanjurjo & Ana Isabel Beltran-Velasco & Carmen Cecilia Laborde-Cárdenas & Juan Camilo Benitez-Agudelo & Álvaro Bustamante-, 2022. "Mis–Dis Information in COVID-19 Health Crisis: A Narrative Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-24, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:16:p:8628-:d:614890. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.