IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i12p6258-d572006.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of an Alternative Definition of “Percent Highly Annoyed” on the Exposure–Response Relationship: Comparison of Noise Annoyance Responses Measured by ICBEN 5-Point Verbal and 11-Point Numerical Scales

Author

Listed:
  • Makoto Morinaga

    (Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Kanagawa University, Kanagawa 221-8686, Japan)

  • Thu Lan Nguyen

    (Department of Architectural Design, Interdisciplinary Faculty of Science and Engineering, Shimane University, Shimane 690-8504, Japan)

  • Shigenori Yokoshima

    (Kanagawa Environmental Research Center, Kanagawa 254-0014, Japan)

  • Koji Shimoyama

    (Aviation Environment Research Center, Organization of Airport Facilitation, Tokyo 105-0011, Japan)

  • Takashi Morihara

    (Department of Architecture, National Institute of Technology, Ishikawa College, Ishikawa 929-0392, Japan)

  • Takashi Yano

    (Kumamoto University, Kumamoto 860-8555, Japan)

Abstract

Since the development of the 5-point verbal and 11-point numerical scales for measuring noise annoyance by the ICBEN Team 6, these scales have been widely used in socio-acoustic surveys worldwide, and annoyance responses have been easily compared internationally. However, both the top two categories of the 5-point verbal scale and the top three ones of the 11-point numerical scale are correspond to high annoyance, so it is difficult to precisely compare annoyance responses. Therefore, we calculated differences in day–evening–night-weighted sound pressure levels ( L den ) by comparing values corresponding to 10% highly annoyed (HA) on L den _%HA curves obtained from measurements in 40 datasets regarding surveys conducted in Japan and Vietnam. The results showed that the L den value corresponding to 10% HA using the 5-point verbal scale was approximately 5 dB lower than that of the 11-point numerical scale. Thus, some correction is required to compare annoyance responses measured by the 5-point verbal and the 11-point numerical scales. The results of this study were also compared with those of a survey in Switzerland.

Suggested Citation

  • Makoto Morinaga & Thu Lan Nguyen & Shigenori Yokoshima & Koji Shimoyama & Takashi Morihara & Takashi Yano, 2021. "The Effect of an Alternative Definition of “Percent Highly Annoyed” on the Exposure–Response Relationship: Comparison of Noise Annoyance Responses Measured by ICBEN 5-Point Verbal and 11-Point Numeric," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-15, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:12:p:6258-:d:572006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/12/6258/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/12/6258/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rainer Guski & Dirk Schreckenberg & Rudolf Schuemer, 2017. "WHO Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region: A Systematic Review on Environmental Noise and Annoyance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-39, December.
    2. Jördis Wothge & Christin Belke & Ulrich Möhler & Rainer Guski & Dirk Schreckenberg, 2017. "The Combined Effects of Aircraft and Road Traffic Noise and Aircraft and Railway Noise on Noise Annoyance—An Analysis in the Context of the Joint Research Initiative NORAH," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-19, August.
    3. Truls Gjestland, 2018. "A Systematic Review of the Basis for WHO’s New Recommendation for Limiting Aircraft Noise Annoyance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-9, December.
    4. Yasuhiro Murakami & Takashi Yano & Makoto Morinaga & Shigenori Yokoshima, 2018. "Effects of Railway Elevation, Operation of a New Station, and Earthquakes on Railway Noise Annoyance in Kumamoto, Japan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-16, July.
    5. Mark Brink & Dirk Schreckenberg & Danielle Vienneau & Christian Cajochen & Jean-Marc Wunderli & Nicole Probst-Hensch & Martin Röösli, 2016. "Effects of Scale, Question Location, Order of Response Alternatives, and Season on Self-Reported Noise Annoyance Using ICBEN Scales: A Field Experiment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christoph Lechner & David Schnaiter & Stephan Bose-O’Reilly, 2019. "Combined Effects of Aircraft, Rail, and Road Traffic Noise on Total Noise Annoyance—A Cross-Sectional Study in Innsbruck," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-26, September.
    2. Christoph Lechner & David Schnaiter & Uwe Siebert & Stephan Böse-O’Reilly, 2020. "Effects of Motorcycle Noise on Annoyance—A Cross-Sectional Study in the Alps," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-15, February.
    3. Truls Gjestland, 2020. "On the Temporal Stability of People’s Annoyance with Road Traffic Noise," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-14, February.
    4. Myriam Tobollik & Matthias Hintzsche & Jördis Wothge & Thomas Myck & Dietrich Plass, 2019. "Burden of Disease Due to Traffic Noise in Germany," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-19, June.
    5. Irene van Kamp & Sendrick Simon & Hilary Notley & Christos Baliatsas & Elise van Kempen, 2020. "Evidence Relating to Environmental Noise Exposure and Annoyance, Sleep Disturbance, Cardio-Vascular and Metabolic Health Outcomes in the Context of IGCB (N): A Scoping Review of New Evidence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-21, April.
    6. Mark Brink & Lise Giorgis-Allemand & Dirk Schreckenberg & Anne-Sophie Evrard, 2021. "Pooling and Comparing Noise Annoyance Scores and “High Annoyance” (HA) Responses on the 5-Point and 11-Point Scales: Principles and Practical Advice," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-13, July.
    7. Rainer Guski & Dirk Schreckenberg & Rudolf Schuemer & Mark Brink & Stephen A. Stansfeld, 2019. "Comment on Gjestland, T. A Systematic Review of the Basis for WHO’s New Recommendation for Limiting Aircraft Noise Annoyance. Int. J. Env. Res. Pub. Health 2018, 15 , 2717," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-6, March.
    8. Thu Lan Nguyen & Bach Lien Trieu & Yasuhiro Hiraguri & Makoto Morinaga & Takashi Morihara & Takashi Yano, 2020. "Effects of Changes in Acoustic and Non-Acoustic Factors on Public Health and Reactions: Follow-Up Surveys in the Vicinity of the Hanoi Noi Bai International Airport," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-18, April.
    9. Truls Gjestland, 2019. "Reply to Guski, Schreckenberg, Schuemer, Brink and Stansfeld: Comment on Gjestland, T. A Systematic Review of the Basis for WHO’s New Recommendation for Limiting Aircraft Noise Annoyance. Int. J. Env.," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-7, March.
    10. Bach Lien Trieu & Thu Lan Nguyen & Yasuhiro Hiraguri & Makoto Morinaga & Takashi Morihara, 2021. "How Does a Community Respond to Changes in Aircraft Noise? A Comparison of Two Surveys Conducted 11 Years Apart in Ho Chi Minh City," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-21, April.
    11. Dirk Schreckenberg & Christin Belke & Jan Spilski, 2018. "The Development of a Multiple-Item Annoyance Scale (MIAS) for Transportation Noise Annoyance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-23, May.
    12. Nicola Mucci & Veronica Traversini & Chiara Lorini & Simone De Sio & Raymond P. Galea & Guglielmo Bonaccorsi & Giulio Arcangeli, 2020. "Urban Noise and Psychological Distress: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-22, September.
    13. Ricardo Moreno & Francesco Bianco & Stefano Carpita & Alessandro Monticelli & Luca Fredianelli & Gaetano Licitra, 2023. "Adjusted Controlled Pass-By (CPB) Method for Urban Road Traffic Noise Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-17, March.
    14. Jingyi Wang & Chen Weng & Zhen Wang & Chunming Li & Tingting Wang, 2022. "What Constitutes the High-Quality Soundscape in Human Habitats? Utilizing a Random Forest Model to Explore Soundscape and Its Geospatial Factors Behind," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-23, October.
    15. Dominik Hauptvogel & Susanne Bartels & Dirk Schreckenberg & Tobias Rothmund, 2021. "Aircraft Noise Distribution as a Fairness Dilemma—A Review of Aircraft Noise through the Lens of Social Justice Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-18, July.
    16. Leon Müller & Jens Forssén & Wolfgang Kropp, 2023. "Traffic Noise at Moderate Levels Affects Cognitive Performance: Do Distance-Induced Temporal Changes Matter?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-15, February.
    17. Tran Thi Hong Nhung Nguyen & Bach Lien Trieu & Thu Lan Nguyen & Makoto Morinaga & Yasuhiro Hiraguri & Takashi Morihara & Yosiaki Sasazawa & Tri Quang Hung Nguyen & Takashi Yano, 2023. "Models of Aviation Noise Impact in the Context of Operation Decrease at Tan Son Nhat Airport," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(8), pages 1-28, April.
    18. Owen Douglas & Enda Murphy, 2020. "Assessing the Treatment of Potential Effect Modifiers Informing World Health Organisation Guidelines for Environmental Noise," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-17, January.
    19. Davide Petri & Gaetano Licitra & Maria Angela Vigotti & Luca Fredianelli, 2021. "Effects of Exposure to Road, Railway, Airport and Recreational Noise on Blood Pressure and Hypertension," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-15, August.
    20. Lei Yan & Zhou Chen & Yunfeng Zou & Xuhui He & Chenzhi Cai & Kehui Yu & Xiaojie Zhu, 2020. "Field Study of the Interior Noise and Vibration of a Metro Vehicle Running on a Viaduct: A Case Study in Guangzhou," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-14, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:12:p:6258-:d:572006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.