IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i22p15242-d976714.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Resident Satisfaction of Urban Green Spaces through the Lens of Landsenses Ecology

Author

Listed:
  • Sinan He

    (Key Laboratory of Urban Environment and Health, Key Laboratory of Urban Metabolism of Xiamen, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361021, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Dingkai Chen

    (Key Laboratory of Urban Environment and Health, Key Laboratory of Urban Metabolism of Xiamen, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361021, China)

  • Xiaoqi Shang

    (Key Laboratory of Urban Environment and Health, Key Laboratory of Urban Metabolism of Xiamen, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361021, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Linwei Han

    (University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Longyu Shi

    (Key Laboratory of Urban Environment and Health, Key Laboratory of Urban Metabolism of Xiamen, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361021, China)

Abstract

Residents’ satisfaction of urban green space has been widely detected in living environments around the world. Most previous reports were performed with objective indicators to reflect the characteristics of vegetation and landscapes of residential green space. However, subjective senses as impact factors in the evaluation of residents’ satisfaction based on landsenses ecology are scarce. To address this, in this study, physical perception, aesthetic cognition, and psychological cognition as latent variables in a structural equation model were investigated to determine the residents’ satisfaction in Xiamen, in southeast China, a famously high green space coverage region. The results indicate that physical perception is the fundamental condition to improve residents’ satisfaction, while aesthetic cognition and psychological cognition are the direct factors that influenced residents’ satisfaction. Residents exhibit a preference for the residential green space which contains more biodiversity and landscape diversity, a higher biomass, and greater openness. In addition, the residents’ perception significantly related to greenspace characteristics. The results provide a scientific basis for urban green space planning and optimization of ecological resources’ allocation.

Suggested Citation

  • Sinan He & Dingkai Chen & Xiaoqi Shang & Linwei Han & Longyu Shi, 2022. "Resident Satisfaction of Urban Green Spaces through the Lens of Landsenses Ecology," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-15, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:22:p:15242-:d:976714
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/15242/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/15242/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jing Tian & Mohan Zhang & Haitao Zhou & Jianfen Wu, 2021. "College Satisfaction, Sense of Achievement, Student Happiness and Sense of Belonging of Freshmen in Chinese Private Colleges: Mediation Effect of Emotion Regulation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-14, November.
    2. Yang Zhang & Agnes E. Van den Berg & Terry Van Dijk & Gerd Weitkamp, 2017. "Quality over Quantity: Contribution of Urban Green Space to Neighborhood Satisfaction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-10, May.
    3. Bo-Xun Huang & Shang-Chia Chiou & Wen-Ying Li, 2021. "Landscape Pattern and Ecological Network Structure in Urban Green Space Planning: A Case Study of Fuzhou City," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-23, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tianqi Han & Lina Tang & Jiang Liu & Siyu Jiang & Jinshan Yan, 2024. "The Influence of Multi-Sensory Perception on Public Activity in Urban Street Spaces: An Empirical Study Grounded in Landsenses Ecology," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Hong Wu & Cong Gong & Rui Wang & Xiaoyue Niu & Yu Cao & Changhao Cao & Changjuan Hu, 2025. "Moderating Effects of Park Accessibility and External Environment on Park Satisfaction in a Mountainous City," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-22, January.
    3. Jui-Che Tu & Xi-Hui Jia, 2024. "A Study on Immersion and Intention to Pay in AR Broadcasting: Validating and Expanding the Hedonic Motivation System Adoption Mode," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-37, February.
    4. Filiz Çelik & Emmanuel Babatunde Jaiyeoba, 2023. "The Contributions of the Green Areas in Residence Immediate Environment on Quality of Urban Life," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Phi-Yen Nguyen & Thomas Astell-Burt & Hania Rahimi-Ardabili & Xiaoqi Feng, 2021. "Green Space Quality and Health: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-38, October.
    2. Kinga Kimic & Albert Fekete, 2022. "The Ratio of Biologically Vital Areas as a Measure of the Sustainability of Urban Parks Using the Example of Budapest, Hungary," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-16, May.
    3. Yijun Zhang & Suzanne Mavoa & Jinfeng Zhao & Deborah Raphael & Melody Smith, 2020. "The Association between Green Space and Adolescents’ Mental Well-Being: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-26, September.
    4. Jake M. Robinson & Anna Jorgensen & Ross Cameron & Paul Brindley, 2020. "Let Nature Be Thy Medicine: A Socioecological Exploration of Green Prescribing in the UK," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-24, May.
    5. Mariana Cernicova-Buca & Vasile Gherheș & Ciprian Obrad, 2023. "Residents’ Satisfaction with Green Spaces and Daily Life in Small Urban Settings: Romanian Perspectives," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, March.
    6. Jongwook Tae & Daeyoung Jeong & Jinhyung Chon, 2022. "How Can Apartment-Complex Landscaping Space Improve Residents’ Psychological Well-Being?: The Case of the Capital Region in South Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-15, August.
    7. Dagmara Stangierska & Iwona Kowalczuk & Ksenia Juszczak-Szelągowska & Katarzyna Widera & Weronika Ferenc, 2022. "Urban Environment, Green Urban Areas, and Life Quality of Citizens—The Case of Warsaw," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-15, September.
    8. Jong Cheol Shin & Mei-Po Kwan & Diana S. Grigsby-Toussaint, 2020. "Do Spatial Boundaries Matter for Exploring the Impact of Community Green Spaces on Health?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-17, October.
    9. Chensong Lin & Chenjie Jia & Baisen Wang & Shuhao Kang & Hongyu Chen & Di Li & Longfeng Wu, 2024. "Evaluating Policy Shifts on Perceived Greenspace Quality: Applying Regression Discontinuity During the COVID-19 Reopening Period," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, October.
    10. Jiale Zhou & Xiaofen Yu & Xizan Jin & Nuannuan Mao, 2021. "Government Competition, Land Supply Structure and Semi-Urbanization in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-29, December.
    11. Liqing Zhang & Yue Wu, 2022. "Negative Associations between Quality of Urban Green Spaces and Health Expenditures in Downtown Shanghai," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, August.
    12. Elaine Hoffimann & Henrique Barros & Ana Isabel Ribeiro, 2017. "Socioeconomic Inequalities in Green Space Quality and Accessibility—Evidence from a Southern European City," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-16, August.
    13. J. C. Kitch & T. T. Nguyen & Q. C. Nguyen & Y. Hswen, 2023. "Changes in the relationship between Index of Concentration at the Extremes and U.S. urban greenspace: a longitudinal analysis from 2001–2019," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    14. Shaoying Zhang & Mastura Adam & Norafida Ab Ghafar, 2024. "How Satisfaction Research Contributes to the Optimization of Urban Green Space Design—A Global Perspective Bibliometric Analysis from 2001 to 2024," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-32, November.
    15. Shuyan Han & Dexuan Song & Feng Shi & Hu Du & Yuhao Zhang & Mingjun Yang, 2024. "Assessing Neighbourhood Preference: An Evaluation of Environmental Features within Small-Scale Open Spaces," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, April.
    16. Ziyi Li & Xiaolu Wu & Jing Wu & Huihui Liu, 2025. "The Influence of Urban Landscape Ecology on Emotional Well-Being: A Case Study of Downtown Beijing," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-27, March.
    17. Filiz Çelik & Emmanuel Babatunde Jaiyeoba, 2023. "The Contributions of the Green Areas in Residence Immediate Environment on Quality of Urban Life," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    18. Lin Qiao & Jingwei Zhuang & Xuan Zhang & Yang Su & Yiping Xia, 2021. "Assessing Emotional Responses to the Spatial Quality of Urban Green Spaces through Self-Report and Face Recognition Measures," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-22, August.
    19. Shan Ke & Hui Pan & Bowen Jin, 2023. "Identification of Priority Areas for Ecological Restoration Based on Human Disturbance and Ecological Security Patterns: A Case Study of Fuzhou City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-26, February.
    20. Tianyang Ge & Wenjun Hou & Yang Xiao, 2023. "Study on the Regeneration of City Centre Spatial Structure Pedestrianisation Based on Space Syntax: Case Study on 21 City Centres in the UK," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-26, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:22:p:15242-:d:976714. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.