IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2020i1p164-d469565.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and Investigation of a New Model Explaining Job Performance and Uncertainty among Nurses and Physicians

Author

Listed:
  • Espen Olsen

    (Department of Innovation, Leadership and Marketing, UiS Business School, University of Stavanger, 4036 Stavanger, Norway)

  • Aslaug Mikkelsen

    (Department of Innovation, Leadership and Marketing, UiS Business School, University of Stavanger, 4036 Stavanger, Norway
    Stavanger University Hospital, 4011 Stavanger, Norway)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to develop and investigate a new theoretical model explaining variance in job performance and uncertainty among nurses and physicians. The study adopted a cross-sectional survey. Data was collected from 2946 nurses and 556 physicians employed at four public hospitals in Norway. We analysed data using descriptive statistics, correlations, Cronbach’s alpha, confirmatory factor analyses and structural equation modelling. To explain job performance and uncertainty, two sets of explanatory variables were used: first, satisfactions of three psychological needs—namely autonomy, social support and competence development—and second, employee perceptions of hospital management quality (HMQ) and local leadership quality (LLQ). The results supported the theoretical model among nurses and physicians; (1) HMQ was positively associated with LLQ; (2) LLQ was positively associated with psychological needs; (3) the majority of psychological needs were positively associated with job performance and negatively associated with uncertainty, but more of these relations were significant among nurses than physicians. The results suggest that job performance and uncertainty among nurses and physicians can be improved by helping personnel meet their psychological needs. Improving job design and staff involvement will be important to strengthen need satisfaction. Results suggest enhancement of HMQ and LLQ will be positively related to need satisfaction among nurses and physicians and will strengthen job performance and reduce uncertainty.

Suggested Citation

  • Espen Olsen & Aslaug Mikkelsen, 2020. "Development and Investigation of a New Model Explaining Job Performance and Uncertainty among Nurses and Physicians," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-15, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2020:i:1:p:164-:d:469565
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/1/164/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/1/164/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Georg von Krogh & Ikujiro Nonaka & Lise Rechsteiner, 2012. "Leadership in Organizational Knowledge Creation: A Review and Framework," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1), pages 240-277, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anup Banerjee & Mattias Nordqvist & Karin Hellerstedt, 2020. "The role of the board chair—A literature review and suggestions for future research," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(6), pages 372-405, November.
    2. Lummina Horlings & Chris Collinge & John Gibney, 2017. "Relational knowledge leadership and local economic development," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 32(2), pages 95-109, March.
    3. HMJCB Heenkenda & Fengju Xu & KMMCB Kulathunga & WAR Senevirathne, 2022. "The Role of Innovation Capability in Enhancing Sustainability in SMEs: An Emerging Economy Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-22, August.
    4. Marie Le Mouel & Mariagrazia Squicciarini, 2015. "Cross-Country Estimates of Employment and Investment in Organisational Capital: A Task-Based Methodology Using Piaac Data," OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2015/8, OECD Publishing.
    5. repec:sgm:pzwzuw:v:14:i:62:y:2016:p:24-35 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Sanjeev Kumar & Rahul Raj & Irfaan Salem & Etinder Pal Singh & Kavita Goel & Rishi Bhatia, 2024. "The interplay of organisational culture, transformational leadership and organisation innovativeness: Evidence from India," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(2), pages 180-210, April.
    7. Douglas Edward Abrahamson & Jane Goodman-Delahunty, 2014. "Impediments to Information and Knowledge Sharing Within Policing," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(1), pages 21582440135, January.
    8. Erden, Zeynep & Klang, David & Sydler, Renato & von Krogh, Georg, 2014. "Knowledge-flows and firm performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 2777-2785.
    9. Mamta Tripathi & Zuby Hasan, 2023. "Can leaders power and influence strategy enhance knowledge management in research intensive organizations: a modified TISM approach," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(5), pages 4725-4758, October.
    10. Xiang Zhou & Samma Faiz Rasool & Jing Yang & Muhammad Zaheer Asghar, 2021. "Exploring the Relationship between Despotic Leadership and Job Satisfaction: The Role of Self Efficacy and Leader–Member Exchange," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-20, May.
    11. Magdalena Dobrajska & Stephan Billinger & Samina Karim, 2015. "Delegation Within Hierarchies: How Information Processing and Knowledge Characteristics Influence the Allocation of Formal and Real Decision Authority," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(3), pages 687-704, June.
    12. Klos, Christoph & Spieth, Patrick, 2021. "READY, STEADY, DIGITAL?! How foresight activities do (NOT) affect individual technological frames for managerial SENSEMAKING," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    13. Beatriz Ferreira & Carla Curado & Mírian Oliveira, 2022. "The Contribution of Knowledge Management to Human Resource Development: a Systematic and Integrative Literature Review," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(3), pages 2319-2347, September.
    14. Marisol Hurtado Illanes, 2024. "Exploring Shared Challenges of Empowered Patients and Entrepreneurs: Towards Diversity, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship in Post-Crisis Contexts," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-27, July.
    15. Blom, Martin & Alvesson, Mats, 2015. "All-inclusive and all good: The hegemonic ambiguity of leadership," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 480-492.
    16. Nguyen, Tuyet-Mai & Viet Ngo, Liem & Paramita, Widya, 2022. "Turning lurkers into innovation agents: An interactionist perspective of self-determinant theory," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 822-835.
    17. Nonaka, Ikujiro & Kodama, Mitsuru & Hirose, Ayano & Kohlbacher, Florian, 2014. "Dynamic fractal organizations for promoting knowledge-based transformation – A new paradigm for organizational theory," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 137-146.
    18. I. L. Beilin* & V. V. Khomenko & N. V. Kalenskaya & Ð . Ð . Solntseva, 2018. "Analysis of the Functioning of the Regional Oil and Gas Chemical Complex and the Formation of the Region's Resource Potential," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 245-249:5.
    19. Jennifer Robinson & Marta Sinclair & Jutta Tobias & Ellen Choi, 2017. "More Dynamic Than You Think: Hidden Aspects of Decision-Making," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-29, July.
    20. Charlotta Sirén & Vivianna Fang He & Henrik Wesemann & Zoe Jonassen & Dietmar Grichnik & Georg von Krogh, 2020. "Leader Emergence in Nascent Venture Teams: The Critical Roles of Individual Emotion Regulation and Team Emotions," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(5), pages 931-961, July.
    21. C. Lakshman & Sumita Rai, 2021. "The influence of leadership on learning and innovation: evidence from India," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(3), pages 307-338, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2020:i:1:p:164-:d:469565. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.