IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i21p8283-d442245.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“There Is No Link Between Resource Allocation and Use of Local Data”: A Qualitative Study of District-Based Health Decision-Making in West Bengal, India

Author

Listed:
  • Sanghita Bhattacharyya

    (Public Health Foundation of India, Gurgaon, Haryana 122002, India)

  • Anns Issac

    (Public Health Foundation of India, Gurgaon, Haryana 122002, India)

  • Bhushan Girase

    (Public Health Foundation of India, Gurgaon, Haryana 122002, India)

  • Mayukhmala Guha

    (Public Health Foundation of India, Gurgaon, Haryana 122002, India)

  • Joanna Schellenberg

    (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK)

  • Bilal Iqbal Avan

    (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK)

Abstract

Background: Effective coordination among multiple departments, including data-sharing, is needed for sound decision-making for health services. India has a district planning process involving departments for local resource-allocation based on shared data. This study assesses the decision-making process at the district level, with a focus on the extent of local data-use for resource allocation for maternal and child health. Methods: Direct observations of key decision-making meetings and qualitative interviews with key informants were conducted in two districts in the State of West Bengal, India. Content analysis of the data maintained within the district health system was done to understand the types of data available and sharing mechanisms. This information was triangulated thematically based on WHO health system blocks. Results: There was no structured decision-making process and only limited inter-departmental data-sharing. Data on all 21 issues discussed in the district decision-making meetings observed were available within the information systems. Yet indicators for only nine issues—such as institutional delivery and immunisation services were discussed. Discussions about infrastructure and supplies were not supported by data, and planning targets were not linked to health outcomes. Conclusion: Existing local data is highly under-used for decision-making at the district level. There is strong potential for better interaction between departments and better use of data for priority-setting, planning and follow-up.

Suggested Citation

  • Sanghita Bhattacharyya & Anns Issac & Bhushan Girase & Mayukhmala Guha & Joanna Schellenberg & Bilal Iqbal Avan, 2020. "“There Is No Link Between Resource Allocation and Use of Local Data”: A Qualitative Study of District-Based Health Decision-Making in West Bengal, India," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-14, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:21:p:8283-:d:442245
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/21/8283/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/21/8283/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aluísio J D Barros & Cesar G Victora, 2013. "Measuring Coverage in MNCH: Determining and Interpreting Inequalities in Coverage of Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health Interventions," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-9, May.
    2. Khaleghian, Peyvand, 2004. "Decentralization and public services: the case of immunization," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 59(1), pages 163-183, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. World Bank, 2008. "Serbia : Decentralization and Local Service Delivery," World Bank Publications - Reports 8099, The World Bank Group.
    2. Lenka Benova & Oona M R Campbell & George B Ploubidis, 2014. "Socio-Economic Gradients in Maternal and Child Health-Seeking Behaviours in Egypt: Systematic Literature Review and Evidence Synthesis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-12, March.
    3. Kis-Katos, Krisztina & Sjahrir, Bambang Suharnoko, 2017. "The impact of fiscal and political decentralization on local public investment in Indonesia," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 344-365.
    4. Anila Channa & Jean-Paul Faguet, 2016. "Decentralization of Health and Education in Developing Countries: A Quality-Adjusted Review of the Empirical Literature," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 31(2), pages 199-241.
    5. Kim, Rockli & Rajpal, Sunil & Joe, William & Corsi, Daniel J. & Sankar, Rajan & Kumar, Alok & Subramanian, S.V., 2019. "Assessing associational strength of 23 correlates of child anthropometric failure: An econometric analysis of the 2015-2016 National Family Health Survey, India," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 1-1.
    6. Daniel Cobos Muñoz & Paloma Merino Amador & Laura Monzon Llamas & David Martinez Hernandez & Juana Maria Santos Sancho, 2017. "Decentralization of health systems in low and middle income countries: a systematic review," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 62(2), pages 219-229, March.
    7. Khaleghian, Peyvand & Gupta, Monica Das, 2005. "Public management and the essential public health functions," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 33(7), pages 1083-1099, July.
    8. Youngju Kang & Wonhyuk Cho & Kwangho Jung, 2012. "Does Decentralization Matter in Health Outcomes? Evidence from 22 OECD Unbalanced Panel Data for 1995–2005," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 1-32, April.
    9. Danielle Resnick, 2018. "The Devolution Revolution: Implications for Agricultural Service Delivery in Ghana," Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Food Security Policy Research Papers 270644, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics, Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Food Security (FSP).
    10. Sander K R van Zon & Ute Bültmann & Carlos F Mendes de Leon & Sijmen A Reijneveld, 2015. "Absolute and Relative Socioeconomic Health Inequalities across Age Groups," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-14, December.
    11. Cherri Zhang & Md Shafiur Rahman & Md Mizanur Rahman & Alfred E Yawson & Kenji Shibuya, 2019. "Trends and projections of universal health coverage indicators in Ghana, 1995-2030: A national and subnational study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-19, May.
    12. Britteon, Philip & Fatimah, Alfariany & Gillibrand, Stephanie & Lau, Yiu-Shing & Anselmi, Laura & Wilson, Paul & Sutton, Matt & Turner, Alex J., 2024. "The impact of devolution on local health systems: Evidence from Greater Manchester, England," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
    13. Parmar, Divya & Banerjee, Aneesh, 2019. "How do supply- and demand-side interventions influence equity in healthcare utilisation? Evidence from maternal healthcare in Senegal," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    14. Kerry L M Wong & María Clara Restrepo-Méndez & Aluísio J D Barros & Cesar G Victora, 2017. "Socioeconomic inequalities in skilled birth attendance and child stunting in selected low and middle income countries: Wealth quintiles or deciles?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-17, May.
    15. Arabinda Ghosh & Daniel J. Corsi & S. V. Subramanian, 2016. "A Tale of Two Bengals: A Comparative Analysis of 23 Indicators of Maternal, Newborn and Child Health," Journal of Development Policy and Practice, , vol. 1(1), pages 1-17, January.
    16. Denis Drechsler & Johannes Jütting, 2005. "Is There a Role for Private Health Insurance in Developing Countries?," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 517, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    17. Jiménez-Rubio, Dolores & García-Gómez, Pilar, 2017. "Decentralization of health care systems and health outcomes: Evidence from a natural experiment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 69-81.
    18. Liangliang Liu & Donghong Ding & Jun He, 2019. "The welfare effects of fiscal decentralization: a simple model and evidence from China," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(1), pages 417-434, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:21:p:8283-:d:442245. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.