IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i20p7693-d432488.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adsorption Media for the Removal of Soluble Phosphorus from Subsurface Drainage Water

Author

Listed:
  • Jessica K. Hauda

    (Department of Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA)

  • Steven I. Safferman

    (Department of Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA)

  • Ehsan Ghane

    (Department of Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA)

Abstract

Phosphorus (P) is a valuable, nonrenewable resource in agriculture promoting crop growth. P losses through surface runoff and subsurface drainage discharge beneath the root zone is a loss of investment. P entering surface water contributes to eutrophication of freshwater environments, impacting tourism, human health, environmental safety, and property values. Soluble P (SP) from subsurface drainage is nearly all bioavailable and is a significant contributor to freshwater eutrophication. The research objective was to select phosphorus sorbing media (PSM) best suited for removing SP from subsurface drainage discharge. From the preliminary research and literature, PSM with this potential were steel furnace slag (SFS) and a nano-engineered media (NEM). The PSM were evaluated using typical subsurface drainage P concentrations in column experiments, then with an economic analysis for a study site in Michigan. Both the SFS and generalized NEM (GNEM) removed soluble reactive phosphorus from 0.50 to below 0.05 mg/L in laboratory column experiments. The most cost-effective option from the study site was the use of the SFS, then disposing it each year, costing $906/hectare/year for the case study. GNEM that was regenerated onsite had a very similar cost. The most expensive option was the use of GNEM to remove P, including regeneration at the manufacturer, costing $1641/hectare/year. This study suggests that both SFS and NEM are both suited for treating drainage discharge. The use of SFS was more economical for the study site, but each site needs to be individually considered.

Suggested Citation

  • Jessica K. Hauda & Steven I. Safferman & Ehsan Ghane, 2020. "Adsorption Media for the Removal of Soluble Phosphorus from Subsurface Drainage Water," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-18, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:20:p:7693-:d:432488
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/20/7693/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/20/7693/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Reijnders, L., 2014. "Phosphorus resources, their depletion and conservation, a review," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 32-49.
    2. Ci Fang & Tao Zhang & Ping Li & Rong-feng Jiang & Ying-cai Wang, 2014. "Application of Magnesium Modified Corn Biochar for Phosphorus Removal and Recovery from Swine Wastewater," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-21, September.
    3. Zimmer, Dana & Kahle, Petra & Baum, Christel, 2016. "Loss of soil phosphorus by tile drains during storm events," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 21-28.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jihoon Kang & Jason Parsons & Sampath Gunukula & Dat T. Tran, 2022. "Iron and Magnesium Impregnation of Avocado Seed Biochar for Aqueous Phosphate Removal," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-13, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leticia Regueiro & Richard Newton & Mohamed Soula & Diego Méndez & Björn Kok & David C. Little & Roberto Pastres & Johan Johansen & Martiña Ferreira, 2022. "Opportunities and limitations for the introduction of circular economy principles in EU aquaculture based on the regulatory framework," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(6), pages 2033-2044, December.
    2. Katarzyna Wystalska & Anna Grosser, 2024. "Sewage Sludge-Derived Biochar and Its Potential for Removal of Ammonium Nitrogen and Phosphorus from Filtrate Generated during Dewatering of Digested Sludge," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Burlakovs, Juris & Kriipsalu, Mait & Klavins, Maris & Bhatnagar, Amit & Vincevica-Gaile, Zane & Stenis, Jan & Jani, Yahya & Mykhaylenko, Valeriy & Denafas, Gintaras & Turkadze, Tsitsino & Hogland, Mar, 2017. "Paradigms on landfill mining: From dump site scavenging to ecosystem services revitalization," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 73-84.
    4. Xiaoqi Liu & Jialong Lv, 2023. "Efficient Phosphate Removal from Wastewater by Ca-Laden Biochar Composites Prepared from Eggshell and Peanut Shells: A Comparison of Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-14, January.
    5. Theobald, Tim F.H. & Schipper, Mark & Kern, Jürgen, 2016. "Phosphorus flows in Berlin-Brandenburg, a regional flow analysis," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 1-14.
    6. Nausch, Monika & Woelk, Jana & Kahle, Petra & Nausch, Günther & Leipe, Thomas & Lennartz, Bernd, 2017. "Phosphorus fractions in discharges from artificially drained lowland catchments (Warnow River, Baltic Sea)," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 77-87.
    7. Beatrice Garske & Antonia Bau & Felix Ekardt, 2021. "Digitalization and AI in European Agriculture: A Strategy for Achieving Climate and Biodiversity Targets?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-21, April.
    8. Jihoon Kang & Jason Parsons & Sampath Gunukula & Dat T. Tran, 2022. "Iron and Magnesium Impregnation of Avocado Seed Biochar for Aqueous Phosphate Removal," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-13, July.
    9. Hongyou Wan & Ruifeng Wang & Beibei Wang & Kehao Zhang & Huanhuan Shi & Hailong Wang, 2022. "A Case Study of Swine Wastewater Treatment via Electrochemical Oxidation by Ti 4 O 7 Anode," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-11, October.
    10. Mikaela Algren & Christine Costello & Amy E. Landis, 2022. "Phosphorus (P) in animal diets as a driver of embodied P in animal products and net anthropogenic P inputs," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(3), pages 1123-1135, June.
    11. Kerstens, S.M. & Priyanka, A. & van Dijk, K.C. & De Ruijter, F.J. & Leusbrock, I. & Zeeman, G., 2016. "Potential demand for recoverable resources from Indonesian wastewater and solid waste," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 16-29.
    12. Weiwei Xiong & Juan Li & Hankun Wang & Yongbo Wu & Dongchang Li & Jianhui Xue, 2023. "Biochar Addition and the Runoff Quality of Newly Constructed Green Roofs: A Field Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-13, February.
    13. Yihuan Deng & Andrew Wheatley, 2018. "Mechanisms of Phosphorus Removal by Recycled Crushed Concrete," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-16, February.
    14. Siyu Xu & De Li & Haixin Guo & Haodong Lu & Mo Qiu & Jirui Yang & Feng Shen, 2022. "Solvent-Free Synthesis of MgO-Modified Biochars for Phosphorus Removal from Wastewater," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-16, June.
    15. Dahlin, Johannes & Herbes, Carsten & Nelles, Michael, 2015. "Biogas digestate marketing: Qualitative insights into the supply side," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 104(PA), pages 152-161.
    16. Xiaokai Zhou & Cunjie Li & Chaoyang Lu & Yang Zhang & Yameng Li & Huan Zhang & Quanguo Zhang & Yanyan Jing, 2024. "Adsorption and recovery nutrient from the tail liquid of biohydrogen production by zeolite," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(11), pages 28859-28875, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:20:p:7693-:d:432488. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.