IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jcltec/v4y2022i3p42-702d869650.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Iron and Magnesium Impregnation of Avocado Seed Biochar for Aqueous Phosphate Removal

Author

Listed:
  • Jihoon Kang

    (School of Earth, Environmental and Marine Sciences, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg, TX 78539, USA)

  • Jason Parsons

    (Department of Chemistry, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Brownsville, TX 78500, USA)

  • Sampath Gunukula

    (Forest Bioproducts Research Institute, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469, USA)

  • Dat T. Tran

    (DEVCOM Army Research Laboratory, Sensors and Electron Devices Directorate, Adelphi, MD 20783, USA)

Abstract

There has been increasing interest in using biochar for nutrient removal from water, and its application for anionic nutrient removal such as in phosphate (PO 4 3− ) necessitates surface modifications of raw biochar. This study produced avocado seed biochar (AB), impregnated Fe- or Mg-(hydr)oxide onto biochar (post-pyrolysis), and tested their performance for aqueous phosphate removal. The Fe- or Mg-loaded biochar was prepared in either high (1:8 of biochar to metal salt in terms of mass ratio) or low (1:2) loading rates via the co-precipitation method. A total of 5 biochar materials (unmodified AB, AB + High Fe, AB + Low Fe, AB + High Mg, and AB + Low Mg) were characterized according to their selected physicochemical properties, and their phosphate adsorption performance was tested through pH effect and adsorption isotherm experiments. Fe-loaded AB contained Fe 3 O 4 , while Mg-loaded AB contained Mg(OH) 2 . The metal (hydr)oxide inclusion was higher in Fe-loaded AB. Mg-loaded AB showed a unique free O–H functional group, while Fe-loaded AB showed an increase in its specific surface area more than 10-times compared to unmodified AB (1.8 m 2 g −1 ). The effect of the initial pH on phosphate adsorption was not consistent between Fe-(anion adsorption envelope) vs. Mg-loaded AB. The phosphate adsorption capacity was higher with Fe-loaded AB in low concentration ranges (≤50 mg L −1 ), while Mg-loaded AB outperformed Fe-loaded AB in high concentration ranges (75–500 mg L −1 ). The phosphate adsorption isotherm by Fe-loaded AB fit well with the Langmuir model (R 2 = 0.91–0.96), indicating the adsorptive surfaces were relatively homogeneous. Mg-loaded biochar, however, fit much better with Freundlich model (R 2 = 0.94–0.96), indicating the presence of heterogenous adsorptive surfaces. No substantial benefit of high loading rates in metal impregnation was found for phosphate adsorption. The enhanced phosphate removal by Mg-loaded biochar in high concentration ranges highlights the important role of the chemical precipitation of phosphate associated with dissolved Mg 2+ .

Suggested Citation

  • Jihoon Kang & Jason Parsons & Sampath Gunukula & Dat T. Tran, 2022. "Iron and Magnesium Impregnation of Avocado Seed Biochar for Aqueous Phosphate Removal," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-13, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jcltec:v:4:y:2022:i:3:p:42-702:d:869650
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-8797/4/3/42/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-8797/4/3/42/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ci Fang & Tao Zhang & Ping Li & Rong-feng Jiang & Ying-cai Wang, 2014. "Application of Magnesium Modified Corn Biochar for Phosphorus Removal and Recovery from Swine Wastewater," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-21, September.
    2. Thines, K.R. & Abdullah, E.C. & Mubarak, N.M. & Ruthiraan, M., 2017. "Synthesis of magnetic biochar from agricultural waste biomass to enhancing route for waste water and polymer application: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 257-276.
    3. Jessica K. Hauda & Steven I. Safferman & Ehsan Ghane, 2020. "Adsorption Media for the Removal of Soluble Phosphorus from Subsurface Drainage Water," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-18, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Katarzyna Wystalska & Anna Grosser, 2024. "Sewage Sludge-Derived Biochar and Its Potential for Removal of Ammonium Nitrogen and Phosphorus from Filtrate Generated during Dewatering of Digested Sludge," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-19, March.
    2. A. Sinan Akturk & Goksel N. Demirer, 2020. "Improved Food Waste Stabilization and Valorization by Anaerobic Digestion Through Supplementation of Conductive Materials and Trace Elements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-11, June.
    3. Jha, Gaurav & Soren, S., 2017. "Study on applicability of biomass in iron ore sintering process," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 399-407.
    4. Ngoc-Dan Cao, Thanh & Mukhtar, Hussnain & Yu, Chang-Ping & Bui, Xuan-Thanh & Pan, Shu-Yuan, 2022. "Agricultural waste-derived biochar in microbial fuel cells towards a carbon-negative circular economy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    5. Jessica K. Hauda & Steven I. Safferman & Ehsan Ghane, 2020. "Adsorption Media for the Removal of Soluble Phosphorus from Subsurface Drainage Water," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-18, October.
    6. Xiaoqi Liu & Jialong Lv, 2023. "Efficient Phosphate Removal from Wastewater by Ca-Laden Biochar Composites Prepared from Eggshell and Peanut Shells: A Comparison of Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-14, January.
    7. Siddiqui, M.T.H. & Baloch, Humair Ahmed & Nizamuddin, Sabzoi & Mubarak, N.M. & Hossain, Nazia & Zavabeti, Ali & Mazari, Shaukat Ali & Griffin, G.J. & Srinivasan, Madapusi, 2021. "Synthesis and optimization of chitosan supported magnetic carbon bio-nanocomposites and bio-oil production by solvothermal carbonization co-precipitation for advanced energy applications," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 587-599.
    8. Hongyou Wan & Ruifeng Wang & Beibei Wang & Kehao Zhang & Huanhuan Shi & Hailong Wang, 2022. "A Case Study of Swine Wastewater Treatment via Electrochemical Oxidation by Ti 4 O 7 Anode," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-11, October.
    9. Li, Shuangjun & Yuan, Xiangzhou & Deng, Shuai & Zhao, Li & Lee, Ki Bong, 2021. "A review on biomass-derived CO2 adsorption capture: Adsorbent, adsorber, adsorption, and advice," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    10. Chang, Boon Peng & Rodriguez-Uribe, Arturo & Mohanty, Amar K. & Misra, Manjusri, 2021. "A comprehensive review of renewable and sustainable biosourced carbon through pyrolysis in biocomposites uses: Current development and future opportunity," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    11. Salimi, Pejman & Norouzi, Omid & Pourhoseini, S.E.M. & Bartocci, Pietro & Tavasoli, Ahmad & Di Maria, Francesco & Pirbazari, S.M. & Bidini, Gianni & Fantozzi, Francesco, 2019. "Magnetic biochar obtained through catalytic pyrolysis of macroalgae: A promising anode material for Li-ion batteries," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 704-714.
    12. Weiwei Xiong & Juan Li & Hankun Wang & Yongbo Wu & Dongchang Li & Jianhui Xue, 2023. "Biochar Addition and the Runoff Quality of Newly Constructed Green Roofs: A Field Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-13, February.
    13. Siyu Xu & De Li & Haixin Guo & Haodong Lu & Mo Qiu & Jirui Yang & Feng Shen, 2022. "Solvent-Free Synthesis of MgO-Modified Biochars for Phosphorus Removal from Wastewater," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-16, June.
    14. Yuan, Xiangzhou & Wang, Junyao & Deng, Shuai & Suvarna, Manu & Wang, Xiaonan & Zhang, Wei & Hamilton, Sara Triana & Alahmed, Ammar & Jamal, Aqil & Park, Ah-Hyung Alissa & Bi, Xiaotao & Ok, Yong Sik, 2022. "Recent advancements in sustainable upcycling of solid waste into porous carbons for carbon dioxide capture," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    15. Shukla, Parul & Giri, Balendu Shekhar & Mishra, Rakesh K. & Pandey, Ashok & Chaturvedi, Preeti, 2021. "Lignocellulosic biomass-based engineered biochar composites: A facile strategy for abatement of emerging pollutants and utilization in industrial applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jcltec:v:4:y:2022:i:3:p:42-702:d:869650. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.